Get help with any kind of project - from a high school essay to a PhD dissertation
|Subject area||Arts Entertainment|
Introduction Only ten years ago america publically condemned Israel's use of targeted killings against Palestinian terrorists. Martin S. Indyk, the former American ambassador to Israel, said in a statement on 5 July 2001, "'The United States government is quite definitely on the record as against concentrated assassinationsthey are extrajudicial killings, and we don't support that.'" But following September 11th, the US makes frequent use of this contentious tactic in the global war on terrorism. In addition to the numerous moral and legal ambiguities, there are significant doubts that targeted killings are effective at deterring and defeating terrorism. In Israel, targeted killings have frequently resulted in increased animosity, loopholes in violence, and provided a recruiting tool for terrorist organizations. Unfortunately, these effects are consequences of overusing the strategy. The United States should learn from Israel's mistakes and utilize targeted killings as a last resort, after each chance to catch a terrorist leader is used up. The United States policy of targeted killings drew significant public scrutiny following American born cleric Anwar Al-Aulaqi was murdered by a drone strike in late 2011. During several months of argument, many scholars, attorneys and journalists accused the U.S. of executing one of their very own citizens without the benefit of due process afforded by the Fifth Amendment of the Constitution. Ultimately, last week on 5 March 2012, '' Attorney General Eric Holder publicized the Obama Administration's position in a speech in the Northwestern University School of Law. Holder said, "The Constitution guarantees due process, not judicial process," inferring that because process happens during the Executive Branc...