Get help with any kind of assignment - from a high school essay to a PhD dissertation
North Korea may have nuclear weapons but the U.S. can't simply go in and take them out. We're in a really different time today. A little nation can be defiant into a super energy. Alternatives of military strategies are extremely limited because nuclear weapon makes any possible war with North Korea that an annihilation game. Beyond wars in history frequently drop us clues of what might be coming later on. There's worth in re-studying among two big world wars from the last 100 decades. We are able to gain new insights by looking at it from another standpoint. The discoveries can prepare for what might be coming next. Military plans are the focal point when warfare history is studied. Technology factors have been largely ignored although they have significantly altered the way we live. It is logical to ask whether these technologies have shifted the way a war has been fought. In ancient times, generals and soldiers fought with swords and spears. In possible future wars, computers, missiles, and biological/chemical representatives will be used. In these sorts of wars, the dominant players are engineers and scientists. The result would be determined by superior intellectual quality and morale one side owns. My argument is that traditional warfare approaches have contributed to modern technology and scientists and now engineers have become more significant than soldiers. World War II is the intersection point of their future and past. To see how the technology played a increasingly important part in World War II, four critical battles are chosen from other phases of the war to be examined. They represent the early stage, middle stage, and final phase. This chronological approach allows us to find the slow but rising influences technology h.. .