Get help with any kind of assignment - from a high school essay to a PhD dissertation
An Evaluation of Brooks' First Battle.After that Fiddle Gwendolyn Brooks' "First fight. Fiddle then." at first appears to argue for the need of brutal war to be able to create an area for the quest for beautiful art. The poem is normally more complex, however, since it also implies both that battle cannot protect artwork and that artwork ought never to justify war. Yet if Brooks seems, paradoxically, to argue against art within a ongoing masterpiece of design, she does so to be able create an artwork that by its very recognition of art's costs would justify itself. Brooks at first appears to argue for the need of war to be able to create a secure space for creative creation. She suggests this notion quite forcefully in the paired brief sentences that open up the poem: "First fight. Fiddle then." One must fight before fiddling for just two reasons. First, playing the violin will be a foolish distraction if an enemy had been threatening one's safety; it might be, as the phrase will go, "fiddling while Rome burns." Second, fighting the war first would make a secure and prosperous place where you can reasonably go after the pleasures of music. You have to "civilize an area / Wherein to enjoy your violin with grace." It must be observed further that while Brooks writes about securing a "civilized" spot to perform the violin, she appears obviously to end up being using this performing as a graphic for art generally, as her even more expansive references to "beauty" or "harmony" suggest. However, very much that Brooks writes about the need to battle before fiddling signifies the she will not support this notion, at least not completely. For instance, Brooks describes making gorgeous music to be "remote / Some time" from "malice and murdering." As well as the negative method Brooks describes battle in this relative series,.