This method focuses on the development and elaboration of sharp fast-thinking techniques, connected with your ability to solve problems that are based on previous experience. According to the modern sociological doctrines, a capability of deep and clear analysis is the main characteristic of a successful person. This method equips you with the right templates of thinking and flexible manners of their modification. It also comes in handy when you need to defend your work or demonstrate the originality of your research, which is probably the primary aim of an author. These are the main rules of composing your work according to a study case:
- address it strictly to your audience. All examples and illustrations must be oriented towards a specific group of readers. The audience that is unfamiliar with your patterns and models will give you no reply at all. You can easily evade this problem by composing a clear and intelligible introduction, designed to prepare your readers for the main part of the research.
- structure your research according to a well-known generic style like APA. It is easier to build your argumentation using a correct template. You will be able to compose an apa sample paper without any trouble and without any other help with this format. Only a correct style of composition will give you profit.
- concentrate your attention on principal parts of your paper. Even an excellent introduction is useless without well-organized argumentation system. Introduction is just like an invitation, so you can start your conversation without it, but your aim is to reach the key-point.
- always prove your thoughts with well-marked examples. Provide schemes and graphs for every important statement. Your readers must be able to recreate your speculation step by step, so the demonstrative specimens may be useful. Do not overshoot the mark! Try to keep the proportion: one statement - one proof.
- carefully separate important information from irrelevant details. The superfluity of facts and notes usually distracts the attention of readers. Being familiar with the case study method, you will learn to concentrate on key-points, avoiding unnecessary confusing facts.
- do not dread defending your thoughts. In terms of case study, there are pluralities of situations that imply more than one right answer. If you structured your paper according to the previous tips, you would be capable of convincing the readers of your conclusions. Examples and samples would come in handy in the disputation and you would be able to find a debatable point in your argumentation without any time wastage.
- always establish some controversial points in your sample. Leave a place for a free discussion, right in the place where you need it. That will help you to compare your speculations with initial statements.
- the final conclusion must contain all important information about the conducted research. Readers may prefer to read only the main deductions, avoiding your argumentation. Some part of the audience may not be interested in arguments and schemes, only in the primary points. That will not be a problem at all, if you make your conclusion clear enough even for amateurs. Put your results in the right sequence, from least important to the most significant ones and your readers will be pleased with them.