Posted at 12.30.2018
Romeo pronounces these words immediately after having mortally wounded Tybalt, guilty of experiencing just wiped out Romeo's good friend Mercutio. Within a fit of trend, Romeo calls for his sword and attacks Tybalt ferociously, eliminating him. This is the climax of the play, that changes inevitably the future of both 'star-crossed fans'. Romeo realizes what he did, now he recognizes he has to pay the consequences of his deed, his already dangerous love for Juliet will result in a compulsive chain of tragic situations, bringing the two lovers to certain loss of life. He identifies himself as a puppet of the unstable destiny.
Even from the opening lines, the audience is up to date about the tragedy that will affect both protagonists, establishing destiny as a style at the foreground of the play. The theory that tragic circumstances were chosen from delivery for these two lovers is suggested: 'from forth the fatal loins' (I. i. 5). This brand as well as, 'a pair of star-crossed buffs take their life' (I. i. 6) points out to the audience that destiny was what first brought them together and is also exactly what will eventually divide them. The Chorus's starting speech is constantly echoed throughout the rest of the play by other character types making direct sources to destiny. As Susan Snyder expresses: tragedy is seen as a 'ritual sacrifice', where the protagonist is 'both hero and sufferer, [. . . ], separated from the normal, but destined for devastation. '
Even though Romeo defines himself as helpless sufferer of his "fortune", there is a lot evidence of the top assignments that Romeo and Juliet have in shaping and, in many cases, worsening, their destiny. Following a careful reading of the play we can declare that it isn't just a question of destiny. Romeo and Juliet would have been able to save their relationship simply by using more acuteness, composure and resolution. 'The choice of means confronting Romeo and Juliet is not restricted to an individual occasion, they receive a series opportunity of choice', but unluckily they always seem to be to choose the wrong way in which to direct their history.
Here I wish to examine how tragic inevitability, coincidence and personal responsibility interact with each other to create the renowned tragedy of Romeo and Juliet, to prove that both Italian lovers were 'not only subjects, but also realtors of their own fate'.
Before heading to the Capulet feast Romeo displays his weakness saying that:
'Some outcome yet dangling in the superstars,
shall bitterly start this fearful time 
by some vile forfeit of untimely fatality' (I. iv. 105-108).
Again we find a metaphor associated with the stars, as if Shakespeare has chosen these celestial systems as symbols for the fatality that is situated over the whole play. But here we find the to begin Romeo's blunders, he requires a decision without thinking of the consequences: he has browse the list of guests that are going to be at the feast and although he is enlightened about the occurrence of Capulets, Montague's arch-enemies, he chooses to attend regardless. As already mentioned, Romeo kills Tybalt out of trend, even though he recognizes it creates things all the worse for his current situation with Tybalt's cousin, Juliet; but an even more basic instinct, the desire of a man to don't be thought a coward prevails and Romeo is motivated to battle Tybalt.
Lastly, if Romeo acquired just taken a while to take into account what he was doing before he resorted to suicide, he might have been in the tomb in time for the Friar to arrive and describe everything.
While Romeo lacks composure, Juliet's flaw is impetuosity. Through the balcony picture, Juliet hurries Romeo into marriage by constantly questioning his love on her behalf and saying things like, 'If thy goal matrimony, send me word tomorrow' (II. i. 143-4). The Friar's flaw, which in the end had a major effect on this tragedy, is to be too impulsive. He offers to marry Romeo and Juliet, even though he has learned there's a huge conflict between your families, probably wishing that the matrimony would have fixed all the rivalries. Additionally, we must remember that it's the Friar who provides Juliet the potion for suspended computer animation, which aggravates things even more.
Even although protagonists reveal many 'fatal defects', a lot of things eventually their misfortune that's not their fault. To begin with, Romeo and Juliet shared the unfortunate destiny that they were from feuding people, putting their romance in jeopardy right from the start. Juliet expresses well this idea in her soliloquy on the balcony: 'What's in a name? Whatever we call a rose, by any other word would smell as special [. . . ]" (II. i. 86-87). A second strike of misfortune is the fact that the Capulets, being truly a typical upper-class traditionalist family, possessed arranged a relationship between Juliet and Paris, up against the will with their daughter.
The scene in which Romeo realizes about the feast is another twist of fate. The illiterate servant of Capulet's was given the job of showing people about the party. Since he cannot read, he was required to ask two strangers to make clear it to him. Those two different people might have been anyone, nonetheless they just happened to be Romeo and Benvolio. Another ironic fact is that Romeo went to the party because he was madly deeply in love with Rosaline. If Rosaline have been there, and she returned Romeo's love, then all the following suffering could not have took place. Romeo was completely in love with another woman going to the party, which he only heard bout in the first place through an negative stroke of chance. Another exemplory case of bad luck is the fact Romeo never received the notice of Friar Laurence informing him about his and Juliet's program due to plague in Mantua, the city where Romeo went to stay after his banishment from Verona. The notice must reach Romeo in time so that he is aware of of the layout between Juliet and the Friar, but metropolis has been put under quarantine due to a plague. So Romeo never obtains the notice and he's left unaware of the plan between your Friar and Juliet:
"Who bare my letter then to Romeo?"
"I could not send it-here it is again-
Nor get a messenger to take it thee,
So fearful were they of disease. "
"Unhappy lot of money!" (V. ii. 13-17)
Again we find the idea of lot of money. The Friar curses this fate, the 'miserable lot of money', aware that the storyplot of both fans has probably came to an end. Romeo is told by Balthasar that Juliet has passed on: 'Her body sleeps in Capels' monument, and her immortal spend the angels lives' (V. i. 18-19). These occurrences are the last straw and they'll lead to the demise of both character types.
Obviously the fate is closely related to the concept of time. Timing, in fact, played the major role in deciding if indeed they would live or perish. Many scholars have described it as the 'lover's foe', which retards 'his speed when the lovers are segregated and accelerates it when they are along':
'O lamentable day! O woeful time!' (IV. iv. 57)
In the balcony picture Juliet hurries because the Nurse is dialling her; if Romeo experienced arrived a few minutes later at the tomb, the tragedy wouldn't normally have happened; moreover, if the wedding of Juliet and Paris was not brought forward from Thursday night to Wednesday the letter would have had additional time to attain Romeo in Mantua; if the Friar got came into the tomb earlier he might well have explained the problem to Romeo no harm would have took place to anyone. These are just a few examples of the negative and incomprehensible force that seems to control the happenings.
We can definitely say that Romeo and Juliet is a crossing of fortuitous happenings, coincidences and personal duties, all masterfully monitored by fate and time. The love storyline did not have to begin, the two fans were not meant to meet one another, son and little princess of rival people. They both realized this, nevertheless they could not agree to it, their love was bigger than other things. Imagine if it was the enticement of the forbidden which increased their love? Two teens, two rebels moving into a sexist culture manufactured from wedding vows and past rivalry. They preferred to associated risk, but risking is a subject of destiny, a cruel destiny which brought them to a certain fatality. As said by Cassius in Shakespeare's Julius Caesar, 'The mistake, , is not inside our stars but in ourselves' (I. ii-139-40).
Word count up: 1546