We accept

United Nations in the Israel-Palestine Conflict

What was the role that the United Nations (UN) played in the discord between Palestine and Israel because the 1940s, up until the start of the 21st century? That is a subject that particularly likes and dislikes me as an IB student because of its origins and its current development. On a personal level, I am interested in this issue because of my youth and adolescence in the United Arab Emirates, where I came across a number of interpretations about the subject. I feel that it is an important subject as, growing up, I made unconscious links between world issues which symbolic issue. These links are strengthened by world politics today.

I will use a number of most important and secondary options to analyze the question, including a variety of internet sources and literature to lower back support my boasts. One particular reserve found my attention during my studies of the topic. It is Noam Chomsky's "EVERYTHING WE Say Goes". It is a assortment of interviews with different journalists at differing times, in which they ask him about his applying for grants the current political and military services situation in the USA and other countries about the world. He offers educated perception on dilemmas that the entire world encounters today, with particular reference to the Palestine-Israel discord.

The final result I reached when writing this article is that conflict cannot possibly be resolved by simple observers of the problem. Personally i think that quick UN treatment could have been helpful to the people but due to outdoor factors, this was extremely hard. The wounds endured by both Palestine and Israel would take years to heal if, hypothetically speaking, the issue were to be solved now. Alas, these wounds are constantly reopened and lead to more pain.


This topic is particularly important in modern day society, as Personally i think that it is a potential disaster zone. The history behind the Israel-Palestinian conflict is truly attractive as it relates a note of passion and honor to people's faiths and values. The fact that conflict has changed Jerusalem, the area that historically has the most religious significance, into one of the very most dangerous cities on the planet is one that I deplore. How can something so precious in humanity's whole heritage be utilized as a message of assault and seemingly irresolvable conflict? I have decided to study the UN's take on the situation and how the organization has attemptedto deal with the problems at hand. I realize that the decisions made by the UN are usually feasible alternatives to the issues that lead it to intervene in various countries. My question; 'What was the role that the US played out in the conflict between Palestine and Israel since the 1940s, until the beginning of the 21st century?" is targeted at learning why, with all the current UN's decision making, a serenity contract between Israel and Palestine has not yet been reached. Having grown up in a Arab express, the United Arab Emirates, Personally i think I can start to see the perspective of the Israelis, while on the other palm, having paid attention to the Arab point cause, I understand the anger that the Palestinians and other Arab state governments must feel to the Jewish status. The conflict isn't only over land, but over trust as well, which is incredibly dangerous, for there is certainly nothing worse than a holy war in my opinion.

Origin of UN Intervention

After the next World War, the creation of the point out of Israel was implemented my numerous circumstances of hostility towards this talk about as a protest against its living in the region. Palestinian refugees wanted to return to their homeland after the 1947-48 conflict between Arab and Jewish communities in the region, six months prior to the separation of the British mandate of Palestine. The UN passed Resolution 194, which gave Palestinian refugees the right to returning, in addition to them obtaining compensations for their loss. The UN Partition Plan was used under Image resolution 181 in November 1947, offering recommending the parting of the spot into an Arab express of Palestine, a Jewish state of Israel and metropolis of Jerusalem. The establishment of the condition of Israel was declared on the 14th of May 1948, that was accompanied by an all out invasion by bordering Arab countries in support of their Palestinian counterparts. This was the start of a long and painful struggle for both Israel and Palestine, a discord which has yet to be settled, with its violence and extremism only increasing in old age.

UN engagement Pre-Six Day War

It seems that, after the partition plan and the creation of Israel, the UN had not been heavily mixed up in conflict, nor was it specifically worried about it in conditions of political and humanitarian aid to the spot. The concern was that warfare would take place between Egypt and Israel, as Egypt compared Israel's foreign plans. The UN placed peacekeepers on the border between both countries and the UN Refugee Works Firm (UNRWA) took attention of refugees until they could returning home. These were the same refugees that were mentioned in Image resolution 194. This can be discussed by the prominent Western european and American powers' interests in your community following the Second World Warfare. These power were leading the Security Council and had the power to prevent extra UN involvement in fixing the issue. These powers backed the Israeli state and wouldn't normally openly say that to assisting their cause due to huge number of refugees fleeing Palestine. Noam Chomsky says in his book "THAT WHICH WE Say Goes" that the USA saw, but still perceives, a potential US powerbase in Israel. From here, we can dispute that the Security Council's leading forces did not allow for the UN to take a more significant action.

As tensions increased between Israel and the encompassing Arab countries, the US provided the Jewish express with advanced military equipment in 1966, for this felt that to keep its ally in the Middle East, it will at least be able to defend itself against possible and likely invasion from neighboring countries. Adam Feron described Israel as "a first line to push away America's direct engagement". He implied that the united states realized that the problem would be hard to take care of and that the neighborhood Midsection Eastern countries wouldn't normally take kindly to some other foreign vitality intervening in their affairs following the mandates had been given self-determination. The tensions between Israel and its Arab neighbours culminated to the main point where Nasser demanded the removal of UN troops from Egypt and shut down the Straits of Tiran to Israel, resulting in the second option bombing the Egyptian air power in Cairo, sparking the Six Day Battle in 1967. By the end of this battle, Israel had taken over the rest of the Palestinian land, like the West Bank or investment company, Gaza and East Jerusalem, including the Golan Levels in Syria and Sinai in Egypt. On the million more Palestinians found themselves under Israeli power while US-Israeli relations eased greatly.

UN Engagement Post-Six Day War

The UN reacted to the by passing Resolution 242 which condemned the actions considered by Israel. It called for the drawback of Israeli pushes in the occupied territories, yet made little mention of the Palestinian refugees. Years later, this would cause more tensions between the two state governments, as allowing that Palestinian refugees back to their past lands would mean relocating thousands of Israelis who experienced made their homes there. Regarding Egyptian Sinai, eleven years after the invasion, it was given back again to Egypt and a large number of Israelis had to go to make method for the Egyptians to come back with their lands. The emergence of the Palestinian Liberation Corporation (PLO) urged the UN to consistently vote for a serenity conference between the conflicting countries under its guidance. The PLO was included for this was a feasible organization and got some potential in assisting the image resolution of the Israel-Palestine turmoil. The frequent US VETO recommended that this convention did not come about. Amid the Cold War, the UN was, officially speaking, controlled by the united states and USSR, always at chances as to what to do next.

In 1970, Nasser's successor, al-Sadat, began reconciliation with the USA, for he firmly believed that it was the only real power which was able to persuade Israel to return Sinai to Egypt. As an indicator of good beliefs to the American electricity, he demanded the drawback of most Soviet soldiers from Egypt. This was not enough to find the USA's support however, as American diplomats didn't take kindly to the Egyptians, who began to think that war was the only solution. THE UNITED STATES was starting to feel that it could lose its Arab followers in your community, that was troubling as it possessed a steady relationship with OPEC. Saudi Arabia in May 1973 signaled that this cannot continue as long as USA so naturally backed Israel as local Arab forces wouldn't normally be willing to support their enemy's friend. This was arranged with American engine oil companies, who recognized the huge financial great things about getting a good relationship with a country rich in oil. The economical superiority that the united states would gain over European countries would be huge and allows for substantial American passions development in Arab countries. All of a sudden, Israel found itself being pressured by its very long time ally to leave the occupied territories. Soon after that, on 6th October 1973, Egypt and Syria proved helpful in a coalition against Israel to take back their lost territories. OPEC soon made a decision to cut oil creation by 25% and put a prohibition on All of us engine oil shipments.

UN activities after 1973

The UN Security Council called for peace discussions between USA and the USSR as tensions were growing over USSR's determination of safeguarding Egypt against Israeli aggression. The olive oil embargo establish on the USA by OPEC was a big stressor for the US, so it worked with the USSR to call for a ceasefire between Israel and the other warring countries. All were invited to the meetings. The USSR had not ended its communication with Egypt, even following the expulsion of its soldiers, for it thought that it was a country that can counter the US's improvements in your community through Israel. Naturally, the peace talks achieved little credited to differed hobbies between each country and the united states sponsored peace agreements between Israel and the Arab nations without the aid of the UN.

Once again, these talks did not include Palestine, which resulted in huge international support for the PLO, led by Yasser Arafat. He appealed to the UN Standard Assembly and called for a recognition of the right of Palestinian right to self-determination. This, in addition to providing the PLO an observer's position within the UN, was granted in a vote with an overpowering for the Palestinian cause. Only USA and Israel, as well as two other countries voted against the recognition. It had been a good go forward Arafat's part to visit the General Assemblage, as, acquired he attended the Security Council, the united states could have surely vetoed his initiative.

The peace discussions sponsored by the united states between Israel and Egypt concluded very well, with Sinai being came back to Egypt and the later signing a non-aggression pact in 1975. The installments, however, were slowed until 1977, when al-Sadat travelled to Jerusalem to finalize the evacuation of Israeli residents from Sinai. The UN had not been needed in the contracts, which the US took good thing about by moving quickly to take control of the diplomatic situation. It hoped that other countries would follow suit and thing to do peace negotiations with Israel after Egypt and Israel acquired agreed upon the Camp David Accords, but this didn't happen, for the Arab countries would only make a deal peace terms under UN auspices.

In June 1980, the European common market reinforced Israeli security but this time included the Palestinian cause in their discussions. They pressured that Palestine acquired the to self-determination and needed the PLO's engagement in a calmness talk. This was released in the Venice Declaration, to that your USA retaliated by stressing on its opposition of the PLO, causing Europe to grab of Middle Eastern diplomatic maneuvers. The UN reacted quickly to Israel's invasion of Lebanon in 1978, moving Resolution 425 which needed an immediate drawback of Israeli causes from the united states. This is done, however Israel overlooked that Image resolution in 1982, when it invaded again, under anti-PLO pretences. It withdrew eighteen years later.

UN and the Oslo Process

UN exclusion persisted throughout the 80s and 90s in Israel-Palestine calmness discussions. In participated in a few modest international issues but could do nothing at all contrary to the Israeli job of the Gaza remove and West Bank or investment company. The Oslo Declaration of Concepts was signed in 1994, after which the General Assembly uncovered that the Resolutions created by the UN about the Israel-Palestine issue were to be produced obsolete by the US as negotiations were taking place. Israel bombed a UN refugee camp in Lebanon, wounding and killing many. The report issued to the General Assembly triggered a lot of anger towards Israel from other countries, as it demonstrated Israel's non-commitment to the United Nations. Western European power were invited to invest billions on its infrastucture. These were still maintained out of any political or military services decisions regarding the opposed individuals.

UN and Camp David Summit

By 2000, no progress have been made regarding the most important problems facing Israel and Palestine through the Oslo interim period. Problems including the Palestinian boundary and state, how to proceed about Jerusalem, Israeli settlers and Palestinian refugees experienced yet to be fixed and smaller issues acquired yet to be settled, despite the assurance of a quick solution. Gaza still experienced problems with its air and seaports as well as security plans. American president Clinton, taking the effort for an answer to the condition, invited both gatherings once more to Camp David to go over the issues accessible and possible answers to the existing problems. Talk failed and the situation worsened when Ariel Sharon announced Temple Mount to be under complete Israeli control. Temple Support is the third holiest site for Muslims and first holiest for the Jews. This infuriated Palestinians, who protested and were shot down by Israeli pushes during a march the following day.

This was a signal to the UN and other countries in the region that the USA's control of Israel got grown weaker within the last years. If Israel dared to take down protesters, it was an indicator that it was positive enough minus the USA's backing, despite having their disapproval, to select its own activities without first talking to its closest ally. Outdoor powers suddenly came into play, once more opening diplomatic relationships with Israel.

The second Intifada escalated and the Arab League converged in Cairo in Oct 2000. This is an enormous change, as the Category wanted to demonstrate that the Palestinian cause was more important than the Gulf Battle. This was a cry against US dominance in the region, as Saddam Hussein, Iraqi president at that time, was invited to the summit. Anti-USA/Israel protests broke out in Middle Eastern capitals, although their governments still relied on American aid for financial or military reasons. Egypt and Jordan, being the sole two Arab countries bound to Israel by non-aggression or peace treaties, were the only real stable countries in the region. Jordan signed a new trade contract with the united states in mid-crisis.

The summit's declaration was not groundbreaking as it did not bring any specifically new solutions to the crisis, albeit the language used. It announced full support for the Palestinians and wanted to ask the UN Security Council to put Israel before a war offences tribunal for the killings it possessed initiated. Attempts of peace-making with Israel were ceased by Arab nations, although departing Egypt and Jordan out of the call, as these were the countries with the most ties to Israel. The most impressive success of the summit was the accumulation of $2 billion to contribute to the Palestinians to support families of Intifada casualties also to protect the Arab and Muslim quarters of Jerusalem.

Outside Intervention

Outside protests in favor of a change in the Israeli-Palestinian situation commenced to appear. Where in fact the USA had recently dominated diplomatic maneuvers in the region, the globe was seeing a sudden influx of recently unseen treatment, such as a sizable number of foreign power leaders in the region; the most apparent of these being the restored foreign interests in the region. Jacques Chirac (French leader and chief of the European Union), Russian international minister Igor Ivanov, Janvier Solena (EU envoy) were all hurrying to get to the scene as fast as possible. Even the UN Secretary Standard himself, Kofi Annan, was involved with negotiations leading to the Sharm al-Sheikh summit. The USA was still the primary ability in the discussions, with Chief executive Clinton often looking at up on the situation as regularly as possible. Kofi Annan, and also other outside people were appeared down after by the united states as these were seen as nuisances in the American attempt to restore control over Israel as it once got. That's not to state that the control was total, however it does assure many US hobbies in the centre East, with Palestine being the least of their concerns. The newcomers possessed to get Israel's acceptance to become considered for tranquility talks or other conferences about the problem in Palestine and with other countries in your community.

Annan certainly was partly accountable for the withdrawal of Israeli soldiers from Lebanon, which supposed that this new openness towards other countries was genuine on Israel's part. He also convinced UN members to simply accept Israel as an associate of the EUROPEAN yet others Group (WEOG) in the overall Assembly. Membership of the group, or one similar, must gain account from the Security Council as well as in the obtaining of other UN incentives. Israel loved Annan's work in his help of offering it such help as a mediator.

Growing UN Participation within the Conflict

USA's reduced control over Israel's activities and over the center East is an essential factor for the growing intervention of outside powers, because of this of a lessening amount of options in regards to what to do about the problems. Protests in Arab countries led to worsening relationships with the united states as they exhibited clear symptoms of defiance; the most obvious of these being the landing of planes in and out of Baghdad, regardless of the sanctions imposed on Iraq by the united states. Palestine refused to stop the second Intifada and the propagation of pro-Palestinian marketing, namely Al-Jazeera, provided people another perception on the energy have difficulty between Arabs and Jews in the centre East. This limited the potential of the USA to intervene as effectively as it had in the past. Kofi Annan appeared with a solution after three Israeli military were kidnapped on the Lebanese border.

Annan led UN work to achieve peacefulness in your community for the Arab countries, urging all government authorities to check out the plans drawn up by the UN. He hoped for lasting peacefulness and understanding, urging the Palestinians to accept the Israeli ceasefire conditions, such as the demand for a global payment of inquiry, allowing for the UN to assemble information on the general affairs of Palestine. The UN just lately regarded Palestine as the official state, which makes it easier for Palestinian economy to build up.

Diminutive UN Participation in the Conflict

In order to maintain control over the diplomatic situation in Israel, it was needed for the US to disregard founded international understandings. The UN attemptedto solve the turmoil numerous times by phoning for international calmness conferences, based on existing UN Resolutions dealing with Israel and Palestine, such as Resolutions 194 and 242 amidst others. Israel refused to take part and the united states guaranteed its decision.

The US described Resolution 242 when talking about a calmness process and a practical option to a unanimous contract in your community, all the while keeping Israel-Palestine connections and diplomacy under its control. It assured that it was a medium for communication between your two peoples, while at the same time support Israel's major progresses Arab countries. Requirements in international legislations including the contracts made at the Geneva Conventions, which required Israel to protect civilians of the occupied place and illegalize the settling of Israeli nationals into occupied land, as well as pre-existing UN Resolutions were mainly ignored to support for the North american sponsored equal opportunity peace discussions between Israelis and Palestinians to come to an agreement as to how to resolve the conflict. Obviously, neither electric power would come to a agreement by themselves, even with the USA as a mediator in the discussions, for their aims were too different. The primary disagreements were over what do with about the refugees and how to deal with Jerusalem, both ethnicities regarding the city as a location of piousness and sanctity. Neither aspect would consent to stop the bombings so long as an agreement in favor of themselves was not reached.

The US-Israeli coalition mentioned in 1991 at the Madrid talks that it could not permit the UN to take part in the turmoil. The UN was overlooked again at the Oslo Process. The USA also informed the overall Assemblage that Madeleine Albright, who got warned the UN that the united states planned on disregarding the Resolutions handed involving Israel-Palestine, that the dismantlement of an consensus regarding Palestine was her major objective. At exactly the same time, final status issues were simply disregarded for at least seven years. Signatories of the Geneva Conventions came up mutually in 1999 to examine Israel's dedication and pursuing of the Conventions. It had been an inconclusive getting together with, for it lasted 10 minutes to avoid angering the new Israeli administration at that time. The list continues on.

The necessity of coming back the problems to UN guidance was growing essential, as there have been rising amounts of casualties induced by the issue, a strict ongoing siege and serious military services occupation of Palestine. The UN Resolutions remained largely ignored and folks called for a fresh, UN-led serenity process. The US interests in your community, by this point were mainly centered on oil and arriving to conditions with governments in the Arabian Gulf, turning its attention from the Israel-Palestine turmoil for a time.


UN involvement has not been consistent since the intensification of the crisis in 1948. It has been confronted with numerous difficult situations, to which it could do little or nothing. The reason for this might be the already heavy engagement of the United States, due to its passions in Israel and acquiring a powerful ally in an area rich in essential oil and other resources. However limited the United Countries' physical intervention was, the resolutions handed regarding the problems seemed affordable and would certainly have helped to cope with the situation, had they been adhered to by the countries concerned. The recent acceptance of the Talk about of Palestine by the UN is a huge step forward in the have difficulty for peace in your community. It offers the Palestinian cause more excess weight when appealing to the US and will surely give it more international support. The condition for the UN when getting involved in this discord is that it's such an extended lasting struggle, with horrors induced by one aspect into the other still fresh in people's minds, as is the truth for many long standing issues. The UN has made several accusations regarding Israel, saying a "grave and large violations of human being privileges of the Palestinian people by Israel".

Victimizing the Palestinians will not help them in their fight against occupation. "Hamas, which has long been dialling for a two-state pay out in accord with the international consensus" yet it has never been understood, it seems, by Israel or the united states. If I had a say in the problem, I would draw up a fresh partition plan presenting Israel access to the northern area of the region, directed at Palestine in the original partition plan, offering it usage of the ocean. The countries should then be split more or less diagonally while still giving a corridor for the Palestinians to gain access to Jerusalem. Unlike the initial plan, I assume that a country is stronger if it is not put into different parts as presented by the UN. Jerusalem should have been made a dual-state capital, forcing Muslims and Jews to work together for the advantage of the city, while keeping its religious importance intact. Had the program been attracted better, I think that the conflict might have been easily fixed. Persuading other Arab expresses to recognize Israel could have only been a matter of the time, for they would have followed the Palestinian example and accepted its right to exist.

More than 7 000 students trust us to do their work
90% of customers place more than 5 orders with us
Special price $5 /page
Check the price
for your assignment