Posted at 10.03.2018
Divorce is considered a major communal problem in the United States of America (USA). Divorce impacts the lives of many people outside of the divorcing family including many aspects of modern culture. Divorce is participating in an active role in reshaping the culture of the united states by changing this is of the family (Schaefer, 2008). Because divorce is a challenge in the eye of Americans it merits sociological research using the Sociological Creativeness and the three sociological perspectives: Functionalism, Discord Theory and Interactionism. The definition and concepts of Sociological Imagination will be defined first. The communal problem of divorce will be viewed from this set of concepts to observe how divorce affects individuals and society as a group. A explanation of the major ideas and concepts in each of the three major sociological perspectives will be followed by an analysis of divorce by each point of view. Using each of the perspectives will uncover useful insights and information concerning this matter. Finally, concluding ideas will be offered and supported.
To be able to see the relationship between the person and their community, for example, is crucial to developing a Sociological Imagination. However, Sociological Imagination is much more technical than Mills' explanation. When a sociologist uses his / her "Sociological Creativeness" it's the "imagination" part that is most interesting and enlightening. For example, you walk into a room filled with people chatting and engaging in normal social patterns. Without intending to you begin to see those individuals and their activities in an exceedingly biased way. You bring cultural, gender and economical biases together with you as a normal part of your consciousness. Observing objectively, thus medically, would be out of the question in this example. Now, envision you are an alien observing the same group of individuals interacting in the area. Because you are not a human you do not have individuals biases such as browsing a male doing the laundry with disdain. It is not hard for the alien observer to seriously see relationships in a medical manner. The alien observer would not feel that any action or behavior is unusual or wrong, the action or patterns simply is. Sociological Thoughts can be an amazing way of observing human social action and human groupings because it promotes the observer to see objectively and then ask the main question in sociology: why?
Divorce must be considered using microsociology and macrosociology when using the Sociological Imagination. Divorce affects the family, a microsociological group, immediately and sometimes substantially. Divorce affects the whole country, a macrosociological group, sometimes long after the divorce and in many small techniques add up to bigger problems. It can be argued that divorce is merely an individual problem. Take, for example, a young married girl without children. Divorce would impact her monetary status and financial future. For a young woman going right through a divorce adversely affects her potential to provide basic property and nourishment would have to be a productive citizen.
She may need to document bankruptcy to have the ability to proceed with her life in a meaningful way. This can be seen as only her problem. She will suffer from bad fico scores for years to come and could have to take lower paying jobs or stay in undesirable apartments as a result. She may become depressed and perform inadequately at her job as well. These personal hardships carry over into her family and work environment teams quickly and with damaging effects. However, using the Sociological Creativeness provides information into how divorce affects a lot more than her and her family. Divorce impacts the culture she lives in a number of ways. The bankruptcy she submitted would negatively influence the already unhealthy economy. Because of her low fico scores she might not be in a position to earn as much as she actually is actually capable of thus, she'll spend less on necessities than she might usually. As she is pushed further into a lesser socioeconomic position her spending will also show up which slows financial growth. Because she has become poor she probably cannot find the money for private medical, so she depends on public healthcare to provide her with medication to overcome her despair. Her divorce got become a public problem. The Sociological Imagination encourages observations like this to raised understand the implications of personal issues on the societal range.
There is another way to look at the young divorcee's personal problem with all the Sociological Imagination from a macrosociological view point. It could be argued that her divorce is rooted in a deeper cultural concern within the culture that she lives. For instance, the social problem of poverty might well have induced her divorce. Many marriages end because of financial hardships. When the divorcee and her then spouse were living on wages that positioned them under the poverty level the tensions of providing enough enclosure and nourishment would have been great. There are many other social issues that could contribute adversely to a relationship such as home violence leading to divorce that occurs.
The Functionalism point of view in sociology expresses that culture is structured just how it is in order to keep its stability thus, its success (Schaefer, 2008). The main element principles are balance, tranquility and evolutionary, not cutting edge, change within the current scheme. The way the society functions now could be the way it ought to be because everything will serve a purpose. This perspective perceives modern culture as a complex system that promotes steadiness by guiding people with a social framework that provides certain public functions. Anything that disrupts the current social structure or functions is seen as dysfunction. If some part of the society will not contribute to the current architecture of balance it will not remain. Manifest and latent functions of corporations are of particular interest to the point of view because they light up areas of society's composition. The Functionalism perspective overlaps with traditional politics views and deals with macrosociological categories such as a whole country.
Conflict Theory is a perspective that views culture as organizations that are attempting over electricity or resources (Schaefer, 2008). The main element concepts are anxiety, inequality and groundbreaking change. Modern culture is just how for the reason that of inequality, which inequality should be actively compared. This perspective views contemporary society as an industry of disparity that creates issue and change. Change is seen as an optimistic power for a population. Issue theorists are thinking about why some individuals have so many resources while some have so few and exactly how this is either being retained or changed. The Feminist view is strongly related to the Turmoil point of view because both package with inequality (Schaefer, 2008). Feminist view looks at disparity between the genders in terms of women's lower statuses in most societies. It asserts that gender inequity is the force that is at the guts of habit and the status quo. Both Feminist view and the Turmoil point of view overlap with liberal politics views and give attention to macrosociological organizations such as American women.
The Interactionist point of view, also called symbolic Interactionism, generalizes about individual social interactions as a way to see society all together (Schaefer, 2008). The key concepts are relationships, relations and symbolic meanings. This perspective views contemporary society as a product of everyday interactions. Humans are viewed as living in an environment of meaningful objects with an emphasis on the importance of icons. This perspective is meticulously related to interpersonal mindset. The dramaturgical way and nonverbal communication are of particular interest to this perspective because they help to clarify how personal relationships are completed. The Interactionist point of view overlaps with libertarian politics views and handles microsociology such as a symbolic exchange between coworkers.
Divorce when looked at from the Functionalism point of view contributes to the stability of the population as a whole. Fewer divorces would actually be dysfunctional because divorce provides a purpose. By way of example, because of this of divorce many law firms, judges and courtroom officials are used. The public system of professional medical employs doctors, nurses and public employees that treat and look after the poorer people in modern culture including those that have lost a whole lot because of divorce. Without the current rates of divorce many people would be unemployed. Unemployment would destabilize societal structure therefore divorce rates must stay where they are really to ensure success of the sociable scheme. The status quo must stay in place.
Divorce when looked at from the Discord point of view must be examined as a microcosm of culture. Discord theorists would describe the divorce as the competition for resources and ability within the marriage where both functions cannot come to an agreement.
The struggle over resources creates tension that results in a big change in the marital position. Looking at divorce from the Feminist view can be seen as issue between a woman that is addressing the inequality stemming from her gender role and a man that does not want to relinquish ability or resources to her. For example, she may have wished her own checking account with private usage of funds while her partner noticed this as an unacceptable amount of electricity for her to possess. The resulting anxiety caused a revolutionary change in their communal structure. Divorce is seen in this light as a confident force since it is changing an inequality.
Divorce when looked at from the Interactionist point of view examines the options that each specific has made, the interactions between husband and wife, and the symbolic so this means of relationship and divorce. There is nothing right or wrong is it simply a way of considering society from a very small scale while deciding how these interactions shape the bigger group. A symbolic Interactionist would ask the divorcee what she considered the meaning of matrimony and divorce. Her information taken with thousands of other interviews would form an image of the existing so this means of divorce. For instance, the institution of matrimony as a symbolic deal between some of folks and the city has changed. Marriage was simultaneously a status sign and rite of passage. It used to mean you were on the right course in life and providing stableness to your community. Conversely, divorce was seen as a great shame then one to be covered if possible. Today multiple divorces aren't unusual. The stigma fastened with divorce has dropped as the "necessity" of relationship has declined. Utilizing the Interactionist perspective uncovers the changing so this means of divorce as symbolic in modern culture.
Of the three sociological perspectives the Conflict perspective and Feminist view offers a more convincing and suitable view of divorce. It answers "why" divorce happens in the most logical way. Americans will be the most self-centered and arrogant people on the planet. American culture upholds money, beauty and ability as the main goals one should work at attaining in life. These ideals do not promote long-term relationships. They enhance conflict. For example, tensions arise in a married relationship due to struggle over money, property and electric power in a marriage. When one individual in the marriage becomes unable to handle the disproportion of resources a disagreement occurs. Women's historical gender roles are still in place. Because women are still expected to control children while working a full time job frustrations arise. These issues as well as many others donate to the current divorce rates. The Feminist view facilitates this notion by stating that the center of the problem is gender inequality while analyzing the ways in which it is still occurring. Conflict point of view points out how these problems happen and how they cause divorce by uncovering the perceptions, attitudes and ideals within the culture that give go up to the conflict.