Posted at 12.12.2018
In the beginning of the movie there's a changing of the formal specialist in Great britain. Tony Blair has been decided on as the new Perfect Minister of Great britain by the voting general public but the position is not actually standard before Queen of England allows him as the first choice of her new federal. "Rank turns up in many ways" (Mindell, 1995). The rank of the individuals in power in England runs from the royal family, then to the Leading Minister who is the top of the federal government. There's a correlation to the United States in that both of us have minds of the country but unlike the United States, England has a royal family that is looking over and monitoring the activities of the federal government. Blair wants to enforce a new radical shake-up of the Constitution and become a more society while the Queen still is convinced in the traditions and customs which may have been in place for centuries. This example creates a possible split in the government because they are unsure which course is best suited for England. Similarly, they have been doing things the same way for years and years and remain intact therefore the "why fix what isn't broke" motto can be used to justify being the same, but on the other palm, the planet is innovating and changing swiftly and it could be time for the government to modify as the world changes and this might maintain a different way than what the elderly powers are being used to which makes them hesitant and uneasy about allowing such major change so quickly. The part in the movie where Tony Blair goes to the Queen to simply accept his position of Leading Minister is sharing with of exactly who has the electricity. "Rank-conscious people know that a lot of their electric power was inherited which is not shared" (Mindell, 1995). The Queen symbolizes the real formal authority in that though Tony Blair is definitely the leader of the united states, he still has somebody who he answers to. "Authority is electricity granted or conferred in the expectation that the officeholder provides the services given in his or her mandate or job description" (Monroe, 2004). In a way, Blair in the top picture is the casual authority that only is the middle man between your people and the Queen but also for appearances sake he is the formal authority in the eyes of the public.
The next part in the movie that demonstrates where command is exuberated is following the unexpected and tragic fatality of Princess Diana. It had been in the Queen's thoughts and opinions that the problem should stay private so there have been no actions considered by the royal family to address the situation, but Blair, who grasped the public recognition and what Diana symbolized, arrived with a declaration to the general public and was well received for it. He increases the informal expert from the general public and becomes the person that presents compassion and understanding for what the public is going through in those days. The Queen loses some informal authority here because she declines to speak publicly about the fatality and even might lose some formal authority because individuals value Blair more to make a statement about how precisely the loss of life was tragic and a reduction for everyone. There's a link with this area of the movie and the article, "Leadership in Tough Times". In the article it talks about how in times of crises people often look for the incorrect type of authority. They need someone that can make the difficult problems simple and easy to fix, however in most conditions that solution is extremely hard and therefore people are worried and worried about the future. In the movie, the challenge, the death of Princess Diana, cannot be fixed nor remedied so the people appeared for a innovator which could guide them through this hard time. The initial inclination was to look at the Queen and the royal family for your leadership, but since no answers or actions came from them the next person was Tony Blair. This circumstance is comparable to how Rudy Giuliani was looked at as the hero following the attacks on September 11th. The people of New York needed a amount to stand up and be the speech of the town and turned to Giuliani for the leadership. He could rally the individuals together to beat the hurdles that faced the people. As for the movie, the various actions from both main authority information can get back to the variations in decades because the Queen is not used to the mass media and attention directed at certain customers of the royal family while Blair understands that the public enjoyed and adored Princess Diana and for that reason should be eligible for know what is certainly going on behind the scenes.
There were numerous perspectives for the challenges that arose following fatality of Diana. First, there was the Queen's view that since Diana was no longing a part of the royal family, it was less of a concern for her and more a family matter for Diana's parents and immediate family. In the perspective of the Leading Minister, he's the man in the centre between the people and the royal family. Blair does not realize why the Queen declines to state or do anything publicly about Diana and feels it would be in the best interest if indeed they would understand the public's emotions and what Diana designed to them. Another point of view is the public itself. They feel as though they have just lost one of their own because of what Diana displayed, she was the "People's Princess". They can be angry and frustrated that the Queen and all of those other royal family do not acknowledge the situation, and betrayed that their own administration has basically exiled her because she was no more part of the royal family during her death.
The arena where people are discussing there being no flag at half mast at the top of Buckingham Palace is truly telling of what the general public was feeling at that time. It is custom that the flag only seem when a person in the royal family is present and has been that way for years. The Queen does not see this as a problem because she is employed to traditions and traditions where as the public seems the family has disowned her proven by the actual fact that they do not even put a flag at half mast to signify the fatality of an associate. "Technical obstacle is when the necessary knowledge about them was already digested and devote the form of any legitimized set of known organizational procedures guiding what to do and role authorizations guiding who should do it" (Monroe, 2004). The technical obstacle to why the flag was not brought up was that the traditions of the flag was that it only came out when the royal family was present and given that they were not there, then no flag was raised to denote a member of the family had passed away because Diana was no more an integral part of the royal family. The easy solution would be to raise the flag at half mast because it would please the general public. This might be the politically savvy move that could gain support from the individuals, but since the royal family does not have to stress about re-election, they do not feel that way. "An adaptive concern is problems that does not subside even though management applies the best-known methods and strategies to solve the condition" (Williams, Real Leadership). One of the adaptive challenges was should there be an exemption made for the extenuating circumstances and recognize that the public just wanted to know that the family mourned the loss of life of the princess around they do. Another challenge confronted was the fact that the Queen hated Diana and found her actions brought about bad promotion to the family. So how could Charles, her ex-husband, and Diana's children mourn her fatality properly if the rest of the royal family does not wish to recognize it?
When the time came to finances for it for the funeral, the Queen relinquished any responsibility and cites that since Diana was not technically an integral part of the royal family any more the duty did not fall after her but rather Diana's parents. There is leadership considered by several individuals to make certain that the public could have the opportunity to attend the services because she was a powerful figure to the whole world. First, the Chancellor proved leadership for the reason that he arranged a committee to help make the programs for the funeral. Subsequently, Blair who directed people to the meeting to be sure that the plan could be carried out according to what was agreed upon. Finally, Prince Charles who, like Blair realized the attractiveness and stature of Princess Diana in the sight of the public and wanted her funeral to be more when compared to a private matter. People involved were aware that reform and change were necessary in the years ahead and that the federal government had to be flexible and inclined to improve as the market changed. The present day way of thinking was to be aware of not only how the associates of Diana's family would respond to the problem, but also the press and the public that adored her. Within the "Is Real Change Possible" article, the four quadrants were attended to. The first quadrant would concentrate on how a person themselves is sense and the growing. The Queen didn't feel the need to improve and develop because she has been in the position of power without the possibility of losing it barring an accident or death. Without feeling the necessity for personal development and learning, real change cannot happen. The Queen is not as concerned with the way the details of how the government is run, only that it is a well-oiled machine that takes care of the problems and issues that arise. It is the job of the Prime Minister to deal with the government and everything that it includes. This can also be grounds why Blair has to be more in tune using what the mindset and frame of mind of the public is. If he was struggling to conform and change to the population, then his authority would maintain question and he would be produced the scapegoat for the country's problems.
Another landscape in the movie that shows the actual fact that the Queen is unwilling to change and grow privately is when she speaks to the Best Minister on the telephone and talks about how exactly the "mood" of the public, which is of grieve and mourning, will be rejected in favor of "restrained grieve and sober private mourning" (The Queen, 2006). She has the fact that she knows the people of England better than they know themselves and for that reason acts according to what she seems would be appropriate. This again introduces the difference in years and the instilled traditions and traditions that the Queen has been used to on her behalf life time. Blair is trying to be the voice of reason and needing the Queen to comprehend that the individuals are not as she believes and they are losing faith in their royal family. Even the people in the Queen's circle know about how her actions, or the lack there of are influencing the people of Britain. Her unwillingness to acknowledge this results in her shedding that informal specialist individuals give and though her formal power may never be studied from her, the value and admiration will be lost. The field when the Queen's car reduces and she rests alone can be an interesting part because this is actually the first time where she shows any feelings over the problem and of course it is done when no-one is around. She has to keep up her appearances and no let people note that she is prone. This makes a link with the "Within Ourselves" article in that folks are looking for your authority figure to keep them safe and shielded. They feel that their head is superhuman and nothing can break them down. The Queen is representing this role for the reason that she has to keep up appearances and not let people see her damaged or susceptible to being overtaken by feelings. She is stuck in her ways that this is the only position she can have, where it could actually be good for the general public to see their Queen as damage and wounded as they are.
When the Best Minister contacts the Queen and informs her of the actual marketing will be reporting in the next day's news he is demonstrating leadership because he does not to see his Queen beheaded, figuratively, by the practices that have experienced place for years and years instead of listening to the advice of Blair and possibly conserving her reputation. She actually is finally able to start to see the other part of the debate and recognize that her actions may not be the right ones. She opens herself up to the opportunity that appealing to what the public would like is the right action and then have users of the royal family instructs her that she has not done anything incorrect. She then makes a decision to have the advice of the Primary Minister and break away from royal custom. She, along with the whole royal family, go to London and visit Buckingham Palace to show to the public that they are in mourning as well. Though she does not individually feel this way, she will it really for the fact that it was the particular people want and she could gain back a few of the informal specialist that was taken when she does nothing at all in response to the situation. "Real leadership requirements that folks make alterations in their principles, considering, and priorities to deal with threats, provide new realities, and take good thing about appearing opportunities" (Williams, Real Authority). The Queen proved that she had real leadership because she was able to change to the practices and values that had been in place for years and years. She also had taken advantage of the chance, although a little late, to gain sympathy from the public for the increased loss of Diana. This is not the same Britain that been around when she first came up to electric power and she must recognize this fact and adjust to what the united states has become. Following the matter has already established some time to blow over and business became business once again, the Queen thought as those the whole situation was an shame to her. In the scene Blair spoken about how precisely the amazing circumstances humanized her and somewhat made the people feel nearer to her, that your Queen acquired no intention to do and therefore experienced it as an indicator of weakness. She continued to state that she did not understand the customers and how she was brought up to believe that duty arrived first and self second.
The last scenes of the movie confirmed that the Queen regarded she'd need to improve if she wished to stay in tune using what the people of England thought and wanted. That is a good example of authority because she admits her shortcomings which is willing to grow and learn. This can be the beginning of real change for Great britain. Blair in addition has gained that informal authority by people through his actions during "that week". This only increases his formal specialist and allows the public to rely on him as their head.
The movie has many instances in which different kinds of control are exhibited. There are also many people in whom leadership originates from, both officially and informally. With much of the attention on the Queen and the Perfect Minister, it might be easy to miss examples of control by the Chancellor, Prince Charles, and other associates of the royal family staff that resulted in the decisions made by the Queen. There have been also many cable connections made from the readings that were done in class and having the ability to see those connections in the movie provided an improved understanding from what exactly some themes or templates were truly about. The movie also does indeed a good job portraying the differences in types of leadership and styles. There is the old-fashioned way of thinking by the Queen and the royal family as well as the new modernized version of leadership from the Primary Minister. These contrasting styles are a good example of what can be true within an organization. There are many different leaders in organizations and that will often lead to distress by the people that they try to lead.