Homelessness occurs for a variety of different reasons. Economic pressure, loss of jobs as well as the inability to find more work, drug and alcohol mistreatment, mental health problems, and gross financial management just to name a few. It is imperative that primary protection strategies such as information, education, and interventions get to those people at risk of becoming homeless. The ultimate goal is to avoid homelessness before it happens lessening the strain on the person in danger, and the limited resources available after homelessness has been obtained.
Strategies for homelessness prevention have to be productive as well as passive. Virginia has executed the Virginia Coalition to End Homelessness also called VCEH. This coalition responds to the growing dependence on homelessness intervention and avoidance with needs evaluation and implementation. "VCEH Advocacy and educational work have led to the creation of almost all point out funded programs for homeless reduction and assistance" (VCEH, 2009). The VCEH initiatives provide re-housing for many who end up homeless as well as strategies to prevent homelessness. The data accumulated by the VCEH can be an opportunity to illustrate the program's success, and also support arguments to sustain this program with additional money provided by the federal government to cover the needs of people who lose their homes.
The targeting of programs such as these are more inadequate when they take on a broader range. The study expresses that people obtaining the assistance aren't at any reduced threat of becoming homeless, or any increased risk at becoming homeless if the intervention services weren't present. "Briefly explained, poor targeting causes an inefficient strategy and inefficient strategies are hardly ever effective" (VCEH, 2009). The main element elements to the VCEH are the following:
Various obstructions to the execution of any program is funding as well as the fact that principal intervention is not targeted upon up to the situation after the person becomes homeless because need is more dire at that time. A good reduction strategy is to figure out the cause of something, preventing it from happening (Burt, Pearson, & Montgomery, 2007). Financing is bound to these programs because concentrate is put on treatments, and rehabilitation, somewhat than intervention because need is more imminent (Burger, & Youkeles, 2004). It only makes more sense to handle a predicament before it becomes a complete blown problem. Is it not said that an ounce of protection, is worth a pound of treat?
Homelessness is preventable in some cases, in others it isn't. With the current economic climate at currently at a standstill, people shedding their careers, and being unable to find work the problem only stands to worsen. Unless something can be done about the decrease in jobs, the increase in homelessness could surge beyond anything this country has ever seen. Stress will be positioned on the federal government, the taxpayers, and real human services workers to do something positive about the growing epidemic of homelessness in this country. Other factors that have an effect on homelessness are substance abuse, mental health issues, and chronic health problems (Burt, Pearson, & Montgomery, 2007). Individuals who are unable to look after themselves are in higher risk.
Implementing agencies to ascertain need, and then handling those needs would be beneficial. Currently there are not enough programs or funding to deal with the homeless problem as shelters are loaded to capacity and folks still find themselves on the roadways, or in tents across the rivers and creeks. Most of these people are the mentally unwell, alcoholics, drug abusers, runaway teens, and the like, however; increasingly more families are signing up for the homeless as they find themselves being evicted from homes because they can not pay their lease or their expenses scheduled to job loss in a poor market (Mary, John, Gabby, & Salvidor, 2009).
The goal would be to obtain substantial financing to put into practice programs and resources that would help people stick to their feet, somewhat than offer with a crisis situation once a person, or family confirms themselves homeless. The trouble is far less to help a person stay static in a home, and obtain any help they could need, than it might be to help them start over.
Prevention is the main element to lowering the homeless epidemic. Homeless shelters by itself will not prevent it from occurring, nor care for the situation once it occurs. Shelters at this point are packed to capacity, and overwhelmed with people requiring shelter because they may have found themselves from the avenues. Where there isn't much to be done about the current economic climate, and the increased loss of careers across America, other issues can be resolved to avoid a person from finding themselves homeless.
When discussing protection programs it is important to look at broad spectral range of the issue at hand. Many organizations have programs which offer with issues like homelessness, abuse, violence, and chronic diseases. However, when dealing with these kind of issues, amongst others, and also working with people who do not speak the same terms, it becomes twice collapse of any problem. Although there is not a prevention technique for language barriers, due to nature of the problem, dealing with that situation are a good idea when interacting with other issues.
Lets take a look at diabetes for example. Diabetes affects many people and is a growing epidemic; there are about 23 " million people who have diabetes in the United States (http://www. diabetes. org/diabetes-basics/diabetes-statistics/). With the 23million people who have diabetes roughly 10% are of Hispanic descent. This is actually the second highest group with diabetes in the United States. Based on the US Census Bureau around 23% of U. S. residents speak very little to no English, of these 28% speak Spanish.
One of the elimination strategies for people with diabetes who speak a terminology other than English is to give a service in their native language. Lets check out primary prevention for individuals with diabetes in their principal terminology. The service I would choose would be to provide healthy workshops at community occasions, church teams and elementary colleges. Based on the Data City, 21% of Kane Region residents speak Spanish at home, of these 14% do not speak any British at all, therefore i t is important to provide this elimination service in their indigenous words, especially since this is actually the an organization that is greatly being influenced by this disease.
The workshops would provide information on what forms of choices can be made to replace the materials used to make the food they are really use to making but in a wholesome way. This will help in preventing diabetes, particularly if it runs in the family or if someone has been identified as having pre-diabetes.
Diabetes has been extensively research so that an evergrowing epidemic it is a problem for public service companies as well as federal government. The American Journal of People Health states in the article The Answer to Diabetes Protection: Technology, Surgery, Service Delivery, or Social Policy?, in order for this epidemic to be handled whether it is through a administration or non-government firm social insurance policy would be key.
Some of the hurdles that might be confronted with the implementation of this program can be money, interest, and enough bilingual educators to provide the workshops. Most cultural service agencies offering these types of programs are non-for- revenue and would desire a financing source to provide this service. A remedy to that is always to look for numerous kinds of grants, with a huge focus on health there are many grants available through different entities. In case there is too little interest, it would be very important to advertise this program, provide figures and promote the key of hoe small changes can make such a large difference. And lastly providing the service in Spanish can be challenging if there aren't enough bilingual teachers. Obviously the first choice is always to have bilingual educators, but utilizing a program that provides simultaneous interpretation will be a choice if there is not really a bilingual educator.
The workshop would add a group of areas. First there would be glucose tests to clarify the healthy ranges of glucose also to refer anyone who might have a high result to a specialized centre. Which means this would also imply that we would have to work in collaboration with centers that provide these services in Spanish. One particular center is The Centre for Diabetic Health and fitness located at Provena Mecry INFIRMARY, http://www. provena. org/mercy. There may also be nutritional cooking workshops. Teaching simple things such as preparing with canola petrol verses corn essential oil or using wheat flour tortillas versus white flour tortillas, and finally a set of resources available in their area.
In conclusion, although there isn't a prevention way for those who do not speak the English language there are many programs that definitely need the problem addressed. For all those programs to be successful in providing preventative care and attention or follow-up health care it's important to have businesses offering interpretation services. Also having programs in the local terms like diabetes reduction can be quite helpful in having those individuals understand the severity or prevention of health problems.