Posted at 10.06.2018
When we talk about great love works, we usually talk about Romeo and Juliet. A play written by Shakespeare in 1595, which is jumping over the time and cultures and is applicable for just about any historical time and any kind of situation. The story is simple -boy meets lady, girl meets guy, they dropped in love from first view and than they realize that their love is prohibited and doomed. Thus they opt to fight against the obstacles, try to save their love and experience their like to the fullest extent. This story is well-known and seductive to every individual. Shakespearean play could be easily staged in infinite ways and so it is what makes it common and understandable to the mass of folks. The story of the two lovers could be seen as the love between a black man and a white woman, rich female and poor guy, Muslim girl and catholic man, communist and capitalist, model and a geek. Everyone needs to believe in the presence of impossible love and frequently it happens and ends with "and they lived happily ever after". That sentimental understanding of "Romeo and Juliet" managed to get so popular and even hard a whole lot of other great testimonies have included the theme of the forbidden love, this play is the structure which all the further are build. Even though the love is one of the primary ingredients of the play, Shakespeare put a lot more flavor into it, than just going out of the straight type of the love account. As opposed to the Hollywood movies, which often end with a happy end for the battling couple, Shakespeare remaining a pile of dead bodies, in the long run of this comedy/tragedy. Somehow here it is where this report leaves its sweets lovely lines and goes in deeper meaning. In the long run there may be that sour sense that great love kept dead and sorrow afterwards, merely to give a lesson to two rivalry young families. It really is perplexing because the theory that their great love overcomes everything is lost somewhere between the dead bodies of Romeo and Juliet. There is something else there, because if that was what Shakespeare wished to notify to its readers, he would have left Romeo and Juliet live and love each other. Thus "Romeo and Juliet" is a lot more complicated as a meaning that its initial glucose feeling. It really is a play that discussions for the unknown patters of fate up to it points out the human mistakes, that have been equally defective for the tragic end of the couple. Because fate can be an abstract term, every person builds its own fate with different choices she or he makes. Although the most common strategy towards "Romeo and Juliet" is sympathetic and blames the events that led to the tragic end only on the fate and the "bad" heroes of the play, this procedure is too extreme. "Romeo and Juliet" is not a field of the extremes, there are no saints or devils, no good or evil, just versions of alikeness of the human beings. Therefore the common view of Romeo and Juliet, being the innocent "star-crossed" fans, who hadn't an option against their predetermined destiny is too shallow. In that epic story of love, the tragic end was end result of different decisions which were reinforced at some occasions by the fate.
The play begins with reason of the situation between the two families of Romeo and Juliet, without discuss their titles, but here on the first lines we can have the fate is going out of the two fans without choice. The prologue says that the two buffs are "star-crossed" and at exactly the same time "mark'd" by "death. " Essentially Shakespeare could have left the whole play as prologue, if he designed to only show us how their love is going to own an tragic end. The prologue here serves more as a informational piece, which will try to lead the mind of the reader in to the direction with their doomed love. Together with the prologue Shakespeare performs with the mind and the emotions of the reader in a way to challenge them on further thinking of the reason why that resulted in the tragic end of the storyplot.
The first-time that a fate could experienced crossed the paths of Romeo and Juliet is when the illiterate servant asks Romeo to read the subject matter that his Expert Capulleti has given him linked to the ball in the night. My grasp is the great rich Capulet, and, if you be not / of the house of Montagues, I pray come and crush a / glass of wine beverage" (I ii, 86-88) Here the fate is on the side of Romeo, he could see his favorite Rosalina, but still this is the first-time that he must choose his actions. Here the young nature of Romeo could be sensed, he is not scared to move the a celebration inside your home of the Capulet, although this could create some difficulties and unwanted situations. The type of the young son is even fired up by the idea of the night time to come and it blames it all to the begins, thus to the fate for the occurrences that will follow. Some result yet hanging in the celebrities / shall bitterly commence this fearful date".
Another interesting series mentioning the fate is Juliet's range linked with the her question if Romeo is wedded or not she says that if Romeo is to "Go ask his name: if hebe wedded.
My grave is like to be my wedding foundation. " Therefore she actually is using strong words to compare her wedding as a fatality, which happens later in the play. However in this early stage of the works, her words tend to be words of any young teenage gal, who is overreacting and using too strong words to make clear how much she desires the mysterious stranger at the get together.
Than in the balcony field they already are aware that their love is impossible which, even makes their love more robust, but in truth their decision for matrimony is too childish and fast, of course, if not may have resolved the tragic end of the play.
The cross-moment of fate versus choice in Romeo and Juliet is when Romeo kills Tybalt in a duel on the street. "O, I am fortune's fool!(3. 1. 11)". In this line a huge controversial question could be found, was the fate the one guilty for the loss of life of Tybalt or it was Romeo who killed him? Fate has only satisfied them, the decision is at the hands of Romeo, and thus he made a blunder, because if he hadn't killed Tybalt, the Prince wouldn't have exiled him and the tragic end of the storyplot still might have been fixed. The role of the fate is only a percent in the whole play, as logical decisions of the personas could have improved with their actions the results of the play.
Maybe one of the strongest sentences in the tragedy is when Romeo learns about the "death" of Juliet. "Is it even so? i quickly defy you, actors!(5. 1. 2)" Here he means that probably Juliet's loss of life was predetermined to happen, but still he wants to defy the stars. His word putted from the context might have sounded as an declaration of the mad person, because no-one could defy the celebrities (their fate). But although at this moment Romeo didn't understood he still had the chance to "defy the personalities", to travel and try to understand what occurred with Juliet and preferably to comprehend about her plan. Thus finally Romeo is talking about choice, which even the fate, which in Elizabethan time was important factor of the century, could be defied.
The selections that the key and the second individuals in Romeo and Juliet, were the the one which mainly described the tragic final result of the play. From Romeo and Juliet were two kids, who made a lot of wrong alternatives in the name of their great love, that was immature, and kept people dead and in the end helped bring them the same to the Friar or the Nurse, who never acted maturely enough and reinforced strangely their decisions. Fate is important factor in "Romeo and Juliet", however in many converts of the storyline Romeo and Juliet might well have switched their tragic result in a different direction.