PLAGIARISM FREE WRITING SERVICE
We accept
MONEY BACK GUARANTEE
100%
QUALITY

The nuclear power

Introduction

I am writing this essay to debate the thought of having nuclear vitality developed for future use by us. This assumes a major issue and protects many areas of my countries energy use both in present and for future years.

When we think about nuclear electric power we do not automatically think of it as a non renewable energy source. This is because it is not area of the fossils fuels; coal, coal and oil, which everybody knows will not last us as reliable energy resources for a lot longer. However, nuclear electricity is a non renewable energy source and Nuclear energy is known as an important gas to produce energy

How is nuclear energy made?

Nuclear energy is obtained by techniques of nuclear fission and fusion. In nuclear fission the vitality is released by splitting the atom mailing a neutron blasting through the nucleus, this makes other neutrons journey off at high speeds setting up a chain response. Nuclear fusion is the opposite where the nuclei of two or more atoms fuse alongside one another, in the process mass is lost which is then converted into energy.

Production of energy occurs in the nuclear reactor which consists of a core bounded by a solid concrete shield, steam pipes, turbines and a final (electricity) generator. After the mining of the ore (this is mainly uranium or plutonium ore) has been done the genuine uranium is converted into uranium dioxide which is manufactured into pellets. A number of these pellets are located inside energy rods. Usually there are about 90, 000 fuel rods placed in the key of an reactor. Nuclear fission takes place inside the center where the isotope splits using the atoms in the uranium dioxide from the pellets. The tremendous heat made by this is carried away by fluid circulating through the reactor central. Once the substance becomes warmed it can be used to produce vapor, this heavy steam drives the turbines which rotate the primary electricity generators to create clean, reliable electricity.

During this process there's a lots of of radiation therefore this is the reason why the center is surrounded by a thick concrete shield to soak up this radiation.

Arguments FOR using and growing nuclear power

To fulfill our general needs of warming our water, heating our homes, cooking our food, powering our appliances and light our rooms, we need to get energy from the many many methods open to us. One of these selections is nuclear energy. There are very reasons why it should be considered and developed further, to be utilized in the future. Firstly, by contrasting it to the other non alternative energy resources (coal, oil and natural gas), nuclear ability is a very clean energy as it generally does not produce any of the greenhouse gases such as carbon dioxide, which lead to the greenhouse impact or global warming. This issue is significant for the disintegration of the ozone coating when fossil fuels are burnt to release energy. Plus using this form of energy can save the reserves we have left of a few of the important fossils fuels like petrol, which is said to run out within the next 50 years.

Because nuclear electricity already supplies a lot of energy, it is also a lot more reliable at the moment than lots of the renewable options we have available such as wind, solar and influx. An essential point and something that must definitely be considered is the fact that there can be huge amount of energy produced from just a small amount of nuclear element. Just one single kilogram of uranium can produce just as much energy as 3, 000, 000 kilograms of coal.

Finally, with the nuclear energy economy being one of the safest on the globe, producing the cheapest energy, development in the future can provide thousands of careers and other opportunities of steady employment for many individuals.

Arguments AGAINST using and growing nuclear power

As well as the very well argued factors agreeing with the future use of nuclear energy, there is opposition to the expansion. There are several people and often groups that raise concerns about the safeness of nuclear vitality. Nuclear waste products that is produced from the nuclear electric power stations emits an extremely high amount of dangerous radiation that can stay radioactive for up to 25, 000 years so that it must be disposed of meticulously. Any accident is incredibly dangerous and can eliminate any life in the encompassing area immediately.

A research study that shows the extreme risk of development of nuclear power and what can happen if a major accident occurs is the 1986 occurrence in Chernobyl, Russia. Here a nuclear reactor exploded killing 31 people, and around 140, 000 people were evacuated as fast as possible. This area surrounding the explosion was polluted by radiation and this will remain for a long period of your time. The clouds of radioactive material which were also released by the explosion multiply, reaching even while way as Sweden. The breeze that blew from Chernobyl also found to Britain and induced acid and other poisonous rainfall that ruined farmland, making the ground radioactive. Farmers remain having problems in parts of Wales due to radiation that has propagate because of this of an accident at a nuclear vitality plant.

Rather than taking a look at nuclear energy's dangers, it also has a few faults. One of they are that a big area of the energy that is established must be blown away because it can't be used. Nuclear electricity is also struggling to adjust to less power production for night. These are faults which not only can cause problems but also inconvenience.

Back to the issue of the nuclear waste material, focusing from its safe practices concerns, and much more about where it could be disposed of without creating major problems. As it will stay radioactive for a very long time it must be discarded carefully. The pollution of this waste products can cause serious results on both people and the environment. An example of pollution has been around the Irish sea that was dreadfully polluted by the nuclear misuse from the energy flower at Sellafield in Cumbria. This fuel should ideally be stored in a safe environment either underground or in special cement surrounded stainless steel water tanks.

Another matter that is brought up with nuclear power is the prospect of nuclear weapons to be developed. In these weapons would be uncontrolled nuclear fission where even if just a tiny amount of unstable uranium or plutonium is used, a bomb would explode. If more countries turned to the introduction of nuclear energy we're able to be vulnerable to production of these weapons by countries such those in the Middle East and terrorist groups, some believe it could even lead to a possible nuclear conflict in the future.

Conclusion

Looking at all of the quarrels for and against the issue of whether nuclear ability should be developed for future energy items, all of them are valid reason that needs to be considered. As for my personal response, Personally i think that nuclear energy should not be developed as the building of more power plants might lead to harmful effects, particularly if accidents occur. Personally i think that the opportunity of accidents occurring are far more likely if this source of energy is developed. This can lead to the deaths of several lives due to the large amount of radiation. Plus taking a look at the locations of nuclear ability plants in the united kingdom, they are simply mainly in distant areas, for apparent reasons, and also near to the sea. More of the can result in their extension in more populated areas placing many lives in danger.

I also believe that instead of turning to another non green energy from fossil fuels, it is greater to get and research into the development of green sources that may give us clean, cheap energy in the future. By looking at changing the technology for these alternatives now, we can help plan for the future. However, if the nuclear industry was developed when reserves of uranium and plutonium ran out we'd once again be searching for different ways.

So overall I feel that nuclear energy, although cheap and reliable, is not your best option to be developed for future use, not only in this country but around the world.

More than 7 000 students trust us to do their work
90% of customers place more than 5 orders with us
Special price $5 /page
PLACE AN ORDER
Check the price
for your assignment
FREE