Posted at 10.01.2018
Identity in its simplest classification is 'who I am'. In case a person asked me who I am, definitely what comes into my brain is that this person wants to know your name. Assuming that the same person asking me 'who I am' is aware my name, then this person is buying more profound individuality of the true me. The individual wants to learn who you are deep down. The answer to such a question will not come easily because who is deep down is never completely captured and indicated in words.
This then provides us two basic facet of a person's personal information: their name that solitary them out from others and the inner, intangible that constitute who one really is. Language performs an important role in defining or talking about the identity of the person. Hearing a dialogue by different individuals, our interpretation of their identities will almost certainly be affected by their voices, accents and other features of how they speak. For instance in Amy's essay, we could tell their identities (Amy and the mom) by using language. Their terminology tells that these were immigrant. This does not mean that terminology solely can determine our interpretation of the person but plays a fundamental role. For example Amy got two form of British vocabulary, i. e. the main one she spoke with the mother and the other form that resolved other personalities like the stockbroker (Amy 2).
Identity as a Linguistic Phenomenon
One may want to know very well what this trend of identification is. Id is realizing who we are in personal level and also at community level. To create such identification, dialect is a salient feature of making group regular membership and social individuality. From such group id, one again is able to know their identity as individual. Through language for example, you are able to know which ethnic group you belong to and from that cultural group who really are you. A good example is of people who migrate to other public setting. These folks find it hard to fit to such environment scheduled to language dissimilarities. For such people to identify with people within that public setting, then learning their terminology becomes essential. After learning their words such individual are able to fit and identify with the rest. Amy possessed a problem with her mother's 'improper' English which lots of the time made her (mother) not to be attended to by section store workers, in loan company, and even in medical center. People pretended never to understand her among others even to suppose they didn't hear her. This necessitated Amy to intervene and in some instances she had to do something as though she was the mom and address other on behave of the mom (Amy 2). Amy could communicate to these people though the understanding of English she acquired learned. If no work have been put to know the British that had been spoken in your community then it would have been difficult for this family to communicate readily in the culture. Bearing in mind that Amy could speak the same British as the mom, failing woefully to learn the 'proper English' as she described her mother's British as 'inappropriate' would have jeopardized their conversation in the cultural systems. Amy British helped her mother to receive identical treatment as others would have received (Amy 2). As Baldwin perceives it, terminology is a tool to show private identity and also to connect or detach a person from the communal identity. (Baldwin)
With respect to social recognition, it focuses how people understand their interaction to the planet, how those relationships are made across time and space, and how people understand their possibilities for future years. Social identity is seen as individual's personality made from the dialect he/she uses within the social group setting (Amy 3). Terminology is a inventor of social individuality and a medium to gain self-esteem and electric power in the population. Communication works as a medium for renegotiating specific position in contemporary society and an usage of power. Gaining vitality means identical treatment. Through terminology one is cared for within that contemporary society. This then means that vocabulary, the individual, and the society cannot be separated in creation of cultural individuality. In gender dedication, language has enjoyed a major role. Language is used differently in regards to our sex and this is evidenced in Beverly article 'Bitch'. Matching to Beverly the utilization of the word 'bitch has been used negatively in regards to women. The whole article shows how women are cured different from men by use of terminology exhibiting that their power position was lesser than those with their counterpart (Beverly 2).
Language action expresses complex interpersonal meaning. Dialect defines the different social groupings within which we live determined and the role we accept in the society. Words as research shows is symbolic of different sociable identities and it is used to construct a specific identification (Baldwin).
In our modern-day society terminology has undergone major subdivisions and these subdivisions have led to labeling of dialects as a dialect or standard vocabulary Britt 15). These subdivisions have been necessitated by a need in the modern culture for closer id of any smaller group from a larger group. For instance, a group wanting to be labeled as high interpersonal class group would like to identify themselves from the others by implementing a certain dialect or accent in their dialect and label that as a standard vocabulary (Britt 11). As is evidenced in Baldwin's essay, the blacks out of brutal need came up with a language that may convey a note with their fellow blacks without the white understanding what was being conveyed. Then according to Baldwin, terms guideline should be dictated by what the terms must convey however, not what is considered standard by the majority or by course (Baldwin). Which means that what's considered standard language is not superior than some other form of words in serving its goal which communication but that require of identification in term of social class brings about such labeling. As Baldwin observes in his article, a language cannot be considered good over other vocabulary varieties as long us those other types meets the necessity of its speaker systems which is communication. He observes the difference in French terminology of folks from different parts and argues that these folks have different realities to control. (Baldwin).
Another factor that contributes to language section and labeling is the necessity for cultural id. Different people across the globe have different life-style and words has been used to draw out this differences. When this happens almost all of the divisions derive from accent in which a group wanting to be identified as unique due to their culture adopts a new accent either on a single language or dialect. Differences also occur where different titles are followed for objects, happenings, and places among other activities (Britt 16).
Dialect is another factor which may have enjoyed role in terminology subdivision and labeling. Dialect in a vocabulary is symbolized by systematic variations in pronunciation, grammar, and vocabulary from other types of the same terms. This difference in dialect within the same terms has led to department and labeling of language. For example, we have American British verse British English. Accent has also contributed in language labeling. In classification, accent is a form of a language spoken by subgroup of loudspeakers of that terms. Everyone has an accent in the same way they have a dialect and the problem here is which accent or dialect you consult with. It is important to notice that you can speak the same dialect with another person but use some other accent. Highlight has led to classification of identification of people according to their accent. For example, people of Boston are determined differently from people of Brooklyn and they speak about the same terms but different highlight (Britt 19).
As discussed before, language has essential role in discovering who really a person is. This then means that variant of language will serve a vital role for those struggling to find their devote the society. We have seen that vocabulary differentiation help to separate stratus within any given world. In the contemporary society, we have the elite, folks of high prestige like politicians, high socioeconomic organizations, female, male, and youth among other categories of group. In Amy's article we're able to establish id of Amy. You are on her origin which is beyond your region where they are living. This is made possible by the vocabulary they use in the family setting up. The next personality is the public position and her British while dealing with gathering demonstrates she is one of the course of elite (Amy 1). The way we look from the outside without linguistic might not exactly really inform which group of group we belong to. An elite walking in the pub may well not be known to be elite by simply a mere check out him/her. However when language is involved through communicating with they, then the way he/she uses terminology will definitely tell you where they participate in in the population. The same pertains to someone who wants to be named a higher socioeconomic position. To such people who desire their position to be determined, then language variance matters greatly to then. It is because it complies with their dependence on identification. Amy shows this very well when her strife to do what population thought had not been possible for her (Amy 3).
A broad connection exists between language and identification. Vocabulary defines our ethnic group that we belong to, our status in the sociable stratification, and also determines the power we hold in our society. Our communal identity is established by our terminology and also our future options are determined by terminology. With other factors placed in mind, language then plays a major role in identifying who we are really and what our future opportunities are.