We accept

The Government Treatment In Mixed Economy

An 'Overall economy' can be defined as the 'Activities related to the creation and distribution of goods and services in a specific physical region' (InvestorWords. com). A combined economy, thus, can be an economic system that gets the participation of both the public and the private industries. These two industries are interlinked through market operations (Peddle, p8).

Is the intervention in the mixed economy suitable? Through their experience of economic history of the planet, economists attended to the final outcome that the intervention of federal is a 'necessary bad' within an economy along with the private sector participating in its role. In addition to the historical facts, the failing of one of the practitioners of the planned financial system, Russia, and the encouragement of markets in China also advocate that the best financial system is a combined market with some sensible government treatment for regulation purposes. Eventually, a federal government may intervene within an economy to determine and enforce, initially, a legal framework to help the economic connections within a cost system. Secondly, the government intervenes in an economy so that it can adjust market working to promote equity. Thirdly, the federal government intervenes in a market to reduce the scope of market failure (p8).

The very first reason, why a federal government must intervene in a market is that the marketplace needs smooth businesses. The main assumption of any regulatory construction of a market current economic climate is the existence of property privileges. The government needs to ensure that property rights are protected within the current economic climate and thus the marketplace functioning smoothly. The specific government techniques, however, will differ from country to country. Besides this the property rights need to be well identified and made satisfactory to everyone. Intellectual property protection under the law, as an extreme example to aid the quarrels, need definition and coverage and the government needs to intervene in the market to make this happen (p9).

Secondly, the government must intervene on the market in order to avoid unwanted outcomes or to improve the benefits of the marketplace. It can be argued that reliable market outcomes may not continually be the 'good' market final results. The free market is deemed to be productive in conditions of 'Pareto Efficiency' where one person can not be benefited without making another worse off. A market, thus may become Pareto efficient yet not good in terms of cultural welfare. As effect the government needs to intervene and make the outcomes yielding optimal cultural benefits (p11).

Thirdly, a authorities must intervene in market where in fact the market has failed in conditions of efficient source of information allocation. In a flawlessly competitive market overall economy the market produces outcome so that the costs at which the goods and services are sold are reflective of the real value of the nice and services. The value is also reflective of the determination of the clients to pay and the sellers to market at. These perfections in the market segments, however, do not necessarily exist as there are certain defects that creep into the market. These include market vitality, asymmetric information, externalities, discriminations etc (p12). These disparities create an imbalance between the value the buyer is inclined to pay and the seller is willing to sell at. This, in turn, brings about misallocation and wastage of scarce resources (p13).

In the light of the quarrels given above it becomes clear that a federal needs to intervene in an economy in order to allocate scarce resources efficiently to obtain most effective public good.

Question No. 2. 1.

According to the passage, car processing is a costly business. Palladium, for example, is a precious metal used in the making of automobiles as a catalyst. The usage of Palladium, thus, makes it costly for the automobile manufacturers to produce the vehicles and reduces the profitability. Within the global market, nonetheless, your competition is growing and the car manufacturers are employing solutions to reduce their cost of development. Therefore, Mazda has announced that it is rolling out a fresh technology that will enable it to produce cars using other catalyst instead of Palladium without compromising performance. The brand new catalyst is going to be cheaper and the effect will be a reduction in the cost in the automobile manufacturing process. Consequently, smaller Palladium would be demanded for car manufacturing. Because of this, the manufactures could have now to buy the newer technology or use the other catalysts. This can result in a fall in the demand for Palladium which, subsequently, will reduce the market price for Palladium. The next graph depicts the same situation:

Figure A. Show up in the Price of Palladium

Quantity of Palladium



Price of Palladium






The demand for Palladium is a derived one- it is derived from the demand of cars. A lot more the cars are demanded the greater Palladium would be demanded (Maunder et. Al, 1990, p. 125). The issue is that factor of production is costly and the manufacturers have released that the newer technology would allow them to replace Palladium for a cheaper suggestions. This ends in a semester in the demand for Palladium from Di to Df as shown in physique A. The fall in demand results lesser level of Palladium bought by the manufacturers. This show up popular of Palladium is mentioned in number A via a transfer in the demand curve from Qi to Qf. Because of this, the price tag on Palladium also comes from Pi to Pf due to the establishment of new market equilibrium.

Question No. 2. 2


Figure B.

Effect of the Technological Change on the market of Mazda and Nissan Cars

Quantity of cars



Price of cars






Economic theory tells us a vendor or a distributor is always enthusiastic about his profitability. Once the profitability of some goods or services increases, a seller tends to supply more of those goods or services. This go up in profitability takes place when the prices of goods and services climb. This gives a sign to the company to supply more goods and services in the market- This example is explained by the popular law of resource (Parkin 1996, p. 74). In addition to other factors influencing supply, the semester in the price of production enhances the profitability of the supplier and hence results in an increase in resource. Likewise, better technology also ends up with increased supply, mainly because the development method has increased and secondarily because the expense of production has gone down due to the efficiency brought about by the utilization of new technology (Maunder et al. 1990, 57).

In circumstance of the automobile creation industry given in the passage, newer technology has allowed Nissan and Mazda to displace the costly type of Palladium with a cheaper one. The effect is that the expense of production falls and the supply increases since businesses have the ability to use a cheaper catalyst rather than Palladium. The resulting rise in the resource due to lower cost and better production method is shown in body B by using a switch in the source curve from Si to Sf. As a result of this move, the equilibrium in the market is reestablished and the price tag on the cars falls from Pi to Pf. Besides the fall in the price, the quantity bought and sold in the market raises form Qi to Qf as increasingly more customers will now choose the cars because of the fall in the prices as indicated by regulations of demand (p. 49).

Question No. 3

New technology is a result of long-term endeavour and sacrifice and normally comes at certain cost. The adoption of technology results in several benefits for a business. Some of these benefits include efficiency gained from the new technology, technology and improved output etc. (Hall & Khan 2003, p. 8). Moreover, newer technology is also complimented by newer inputs and even newer actions (9). The adoption of newer technology may sometimes be expensive or difficult credited to some non-financial circumstances. Thus along with the want to look at newer technology, there is also tendency among the list of producers to ignore the use of new technology. In case there is the car industry, non-acceptance of new technology can show devastating. The given passage explains to us that the automobile developing industry is internationally stretched in a number of countries, each one seeking to develop a comparative benefits over the other. Therefore, one of the ways this comparative advantage may be developed is by using better technology. Organizations not implementing new technology will suffer lack of sales as well negative- goodwill with their product and brand. Thus, the utilization of technology is important in the cost industry to reduce prices, improve profits and stay competitive.

More than 7 000 students trust us to do their work
90% of customers place more than 5 orders with us
Special price $5 /page
Check the price
for your assignment