PLAGIARISM FREE WRITING SERVICE
We accept
MONEY BACK GUARANTEE
100%
QUALITY

The Electoral School An Outdated System Politics Essay

Every fourth twelve months the individuals of america participate in one of the greatest displays of Democracy in history, the election of the President and Vice-President of america. However, it is not truly democracy. Instead, the democratic election of the President of america is tainted by the current use of the Electoral College or university. The Electoral School system of electing the Leader and Vice-President of america is an out-of-date system that should be replaced with a way that better symbolizes the will of the American people.

In the budding days of america of America, the Founding Fathers confronted a difficult problem, the election process for the Chief executive of america. There have been numerous factors that needed to be taken into account by the Founding Fathers as they debated the perfect election process. The most significant factor considered by the Founding Fathers was that the nation was comprised of thirteen states which got only recently signed up with together to create a singular authorities and were jealously guarding their individual rights and forces, making them apprehensive to any centralized federal government ideas. AMERICA also covered four million citizens whom were separated by thousands of mls of land which was scarcely connected by either vehicles or communication. Furthermore, the founders believed that political people were detrimental and counter-productive, a concept borrowed from the British isles (Kimberling 1).

After considering these issues and proposing several options, the Founding Fathers developed the Electoral College or university which can trace its roots to the Catholic Church's School of Cardinals and the Roman Republic's Centurial Assembly (Kimberling 2). The Electoral College or university as identified by Article Two, Section Among the Constitution, comprises of six items. First, each state is allotted Electors add up to the number of its U. S senators in addition to the amount of its U. S Reps. Second, the individual Status legislatures are allowed discretion in choosing their electors with the constraint that members of Congress and other Government Servants are prohibited from portion as Electors. Third, State's Electors must meet in their Says alternatively than in a national appointment. Fourth, Electors are required to cast two votes for leader, one of which had to be from another point out than the Elector. Fifth, the Candidate who obtains a complete majority of the electoral votes becomes leader with the runner-up becoming Vice-President. Finally, if no Candidate obtains an absolute bulk than the U. S. House of Staff would choose the chief executive from among the top five. In this case, each status would be allotted only one vote. If a tie was reached in the House than the top two would be voted on by the Senate (Kimberling 3).

The Electoral University was both complex and appropriate at that time that it was made. However, after 2 hundred years and an amendment, the 12th (1804), the Electoral University has greatly altered. Currently, the election of the President of the United States and the Electoral College or university functions as follows. The amount of each State's allotted Electors is add up to the amount of State's Senators in addition to the number of the State's Representatives. At the beginning of any election, political gatherings in each Condition submit a set of individuals whom will act as the State's Electors if their candidate wins. Political gatherings then meet to nominate their presidential and vice presidential applicants, whom are then put into the ballot. In the Tuesday following a first Mon of November, the general populace of each Express then votes for the electors representing their presidential and vice-presidential choice. It really is a Winner-Take-All System in almost all States. Within a Winner-Take-All System, whichever applicant gets the most votes gets all the Electors. The exceptions to the Winner-Take-All System are Kansas and Maine which allot two Electors predicated on popular vote and the rest to specific Congressional districts. The earning set of electors then goes on to represent their state in the Electoral University. On the Monday following the second Wednesday of December the State's Electors meet in their individual capitals and cast their votes for both leader and vice chief executive. The Electors still must use at least one of these votes over a prospect from outside their house State. Every one of the Electoral Votes are then opened up by the Leader of the Senate on January 6th prior to the homes of Congress. Whichever applicant gains a complete majority in the Electoral University is declared president. The same is true for the vice-president. If no candidate gets absolute bulk for president the most notable three contenders are voted on inside your home of Associates which each Status getting one vote. In the same way, if no vice-presidential prospect gets an absolute bulk, the Senate decides between the top two contenders. Finally, at noon on January 20th, the elected leader and vice-president are sworn into office.

The Electoral School system is neither good nor healthy. However, there a wide range of proponents of the Electoral School. They claim that the Electoral University is really the only possible system for reasonably electing the leader of a land as large and diverse as the United States. That's not a true statement. Instead, there are is a multitude of alternative ways that the election of the chief executive and vice-president of america can occur.

The most commonly referred to alternative to the Electoral College or university is a simple direct majority election where whoever gained overall majority in america would become president. A simple direct majority vote is greatly beneficial since it better symbolizes the will of america as a whole compared to the Electoral College. Beneath the Electoral School, the presidency has gone to the applicant with fewer popular votes in a single from every sixteen elections (Country wide Popular Vote). One of the most noticeable of these cases occurred in the 1824 election between Andrew Jackson and John Q. Adams. Andrew Jackson obtained 60% of the favorite vote and yet lost to John Q. Adams whom acquired gained the required electoral votes. In the same way, under the Electoral College, not everyone's vote is similar. Country wide Popular Vote gives a fantastic example of this: " Gore received five electoral votes by holding New Mexico by 365 popular votes in the 2000 presidential election, whereas Bush gained five electoral votes by carrying Utah by 312, 043 popular votes-an 855-to-1 disparity in the importance of your vote"(Country wide Popular Vote). It really is clear that a simple direct majority vote is a much better representation of the will of the American people than the presently implemented Electoral College.

There are a variety of problems with implementing a simple direct majority election. Possibly the greatest of the problems is the increased likelihood and associated problems of your candidate not having the ability to gain almost all vote (over 50%) that would be associated with a primary majority election. There are however many solutions to this potential problem. Essentially the most promising of these solutions is Immediate Election with Instant Runoff Voting which is presented by Fair Vote. Under an instantaneous Runoff Voting system, each voter would get ranking their presidential tastes versus the standard choosing of only 1 candidate.

National Popular Vote is a invoice that advises each Express simply

More than 7 000 students trust us to do their work
90% of customers place more than 5 orders with us
Special price $5 /page
PLACE AN ORDER
Check the price
for your assignment
FREE