Posted at 12.12.2018
Based on the BP Essential oil Explosion in Tx, the tragedy triggered huge environment damages and the threaten to human protection and health: the deep-water engine oil spilled on the sea and the shorelines, the consequences on the ecology of coastline and sea practices, the burning-off oil-water blend causing air pollution, the hazardous materials leak into the atmosphere, the old drum too finished to highly flammable "Isom" hanging around to explode, in which 5 workers were killed and 170 were wounded on March 23 2005.
The issues with the occurrence involve unsafe working environment, disproportionate work and insufficient information of basic safety knowledge. While this mistake features to the worker's individual improper action, the assertion is inaccurate in that it does not reflect steps to make safe practices environment in working in BP oil crops. Furthermore, between BP's upper-class professionals, who made more scandals, in order to reduce operation costs and make better financial business cycles, they even resigned avoid to accident responsibility, made bogus audit financial statement, disapproved Chemical Safeness and Hazard Analysis Board reports, postponed all essential expenses. On the other hand, who is responsibility for managing with the injuries, who is caring for employee's safety and life, and who's preserving the planet earth we live and offering us good environment?
According to the automobile accident BP oil spill explosion in Tx refinery, it includes brought on serious environment damage and irreversible useless and wounded. This creativity is given is the fact the corporation have to guarantee the organization security, find out security problems to enough time crash happen again. In this mishap, the spokesman of BP Ron Chapman claimed, "The BP fatal inspection team did not identify previous budget decisions or insufficient expenditure as a critical factor or immediate cause. " The clarification is obscure and unacceptable. To enhance corporation safety, we're able to reveal the fact by discounting many of clues: The declare that the worker's injures are brought on by of the worker's individual inattention to the safeness code is doubtful. Regarding to Baker Panel's reviews, the BP's worker agreed to follow the prevailing security conduction. On the other hand, Baker's Panel discovered that the staff were lack of operating willpower, which implicates the duty vaguely. In Baker Panel's reviews, on 9th Dec 2005 BP spent 10, 000, 000 on Tx. Unfortunately, BP dealt with the mishap on financial way. BP's irresponsible frame of mind could be entirely on Lord Browne, BP's chief executive's early retirement living when the crash happened. After, BP's safety procedures are stops at paper work only to exhibit the safety and health laws. Inside the similar way, the boards of director and professionals monitored the safety systems by emphasizing the staff safety regularly on the information. And, another irresponsible attitude is, Carolyn Merrits, seat of CBS, said CBS's executives disagree with the report about the financial finances. In corporation's security and health conduction, someone would accountable for safe operating procedures. However, the employees do not have proper safe practices and health conduction to check out. The safety code in BP to operating is only concentrated on reducing personal injuries which is inadequate on save worker's life - such a dangerous industry, petroleum company ignore the security process and can not control petroleum basic safety.
First of all, I think that the BP's employees, especially the staff do not be treated fairly predicated on the basic safety and healthy conduction. Regulations cannot protect the employees from threat and threaten of the chemicals and petroleum. For instance, the worker made a lot more work to earn their safety and only on preventing do it yourself injuries, not on all surprising problems and threatens. In addition, BP personnel are insufficient training based on the protection and health conduction. The employees don't have sufficient knowledge and training to fully make their work environment safely, so that the accidents happen on a regular basis. While the crash happened, the personnel cannot handle with the situation in order that they lose their life or get accidents. However, for legal reasons, the corporation protection is supervised by Occupational Safe practices and Health Administration (OSHA). Naturally, OSHA can be an inefficient organization, and it generally does not supervise the organization basic safety and health. Once we read, OSHA didn't help BP make Safeness and Health code, OSHA didn't inspected whether BP's safe practices action is exact under the safeness and health code occasionally. OSHA didn't make sure the employees use chemical in the right way, did not make sure the petroleum facilities are safe and did not make sure the staff member works in a safe working environment. On the other hand, BP personnel do not protect by the labor law, despite the companies have to follow regulations and respect the human protection under the law, the company does not follow. The employees overtime work, explode on the risk environment, their life and security are threatened on a regular basis, and their human being rights are not respected.
In the second place, the financial cycles become an only factor in jogging company's business. In order to make more business profit, the BP Company canceled security budget, thus BP used a pressure budget to perform safety program which cause serious security problem. On the basis of BP's financial claims, BP only bought cheap equipment so that it caused the blow down drum drip hazardous materials into atmosphere. Moreover, the drum in Texas was built in 1950s and refitted in 1997 which is strictly old that is why brought on BP explosion mishap. So far as we realize, on BP's financial record, predicated on the essential oil majors' mantra: "squeeze more cash out of a well, or flower, by chopping costs to the bone, and delay all but essential expenditure. More money from shrinking property: higher earnings. "BP postponed all essential costs to other companies, government, buyers which is unfaithful to the people who recognized BP's business, nevertheless, BP made more serious environment pollution to them. To make issues worse, BP shrunk almost all of their resources to the money which made more unstable business. Nevertheless, BP's professionals were still pleased with their financial management which made high gains and good business cycles. Such a business does not pay their expenditures, makes dangerous and unpredictable of property and cashes, how could the people and residents listen to the company and trust the company? The thing BP Company worried about is high earnings.
To maintain sufficient protection and health criteria, companies must avoid:
Under the business interests, the businesses tend to react with respect to their own short-term pursuits, not with respect to the surroundings. This clam provides rise to sophisticated issues about business interests and corporation responsibilities. In my view, the promise assumes a distortedly narrow view of firm responsibilities, overlooking certain areas of more costs of security and health insurance and environment prevention. On the contrary, maximizing shareholders prosperity and preserving security environment at times coincides and at times conflicts. While the companies may only concentrate on the business interests, an unknowing toxin pollutes the surroundings, it would be cost a lot more to completely clean up and restore the surroundings. Furthermore, the settlement of the deceased and injury staff caused the companies more dropping their pursuits than business pursuits. Thus the employees would lose their jobs, and the shareholders would lose their benefits as well. Thus it brought on the increasing of the oil prices, therefore individuals all around the world payed for these irresponsible of environment destruction. Financial routine of course a key point to be taken into account but there's also a lot more essential factors participating in in the same way pivotal a role and not one of these, including, the safety and health, corporation environment, social obligation, good management Corporation responsibilities is identifying in every solo case. However, few companies take more awareness of business benefits, but the BP explosion tragedy advised us the importance of the organization responsibilities: Financial routine should not be overriding factor in running the business; the corporation shouldn't take ethics in trading off individuals for the sake of its own income.
As it stands, the business need take firm responsibilities to protect employee's safe practices and preserving the nature environment. Appropriately, the firms have to quite treat their employees by following a labor law. The companies have to respect the human right of their workers; do not make the personnel overtime work, make over attempts, and employees have rights to acquire adequate self-control of safe and health working environment. Consequently, the organizations have to protect the employee's safe practices and health by following security and health conduction. The organization need have their own basic safety and health legislation to prevent the unexpected security and health accidents. On this earth, the firms have to follow the relevant safety and health regulators' conduction; the companies have to make sure have the proper safeness and health action for employees to follow. The companies have to give the employees sufficient basic safety and health information, proper security and health training, requirements safety and health facilities and review the protection and health conduction routinely. The personnel not just have the knowledge of prevent people from injuries, should know about their job-related problems, but also getting the thorough understanding of the protection and health conduction to know how to safeguard their selves from risk chemicals, petroleum and unpredicted accidents. While it makes some sense in a obscure way to share the tasks, the obligations participate in individuals will allocated by all relevant lines of expert within the business. When we do assign responsibility to organizations, it must be plainly distributed to individuals.
Nowadays fewer and fewer individuals allow to work in a risk, unsafely and bad working environment. More and more companies increase moral standards to turn into the firm responsibilities. The principal obligation to preserve the surroundings is automatically to be obeyed by the companies. The corporation must, at least respect the law, respect the individual rights; obey the protection and health polices and environmental preserving conductions. The law and the real human protection under the law will priority to perform the business. To be able to practice regulations, the firms require portioning out set and proper safe practices and health budget which reaches least enough to keep equipment, provide sufficient safe and health information and training to the employees as an important budget in jogging the business. To avoid other external pursuits the firms from cutting the safe practices and health budget, the companies should not give political efforts or undesirable business methods from corporation cash which other exterior interests could impact companies' costs. Besides, the fines or compensations might be a measure to prevent companies unwilling to do something corporation responsibilities. Furthermore, the businesses require obeying the safe practices and health legislation via the supervision of the directors of table committees and also the corporations require being guidance under safe practices, ethics and environment confidence committee. Moreover, the organization could make moral strategies into trading guidelines which gain a corporation financially thus the shareholders will choose the high honest to follow when going after high business pursuits. The federal government might be recommended to improve more security and health tournaments to energize more current economic climate maximize highly honest behavior when the firms maximize profits.
In the final conclusion, business ethical is often beyond business hobbies. Thus the choice to check out high ethical standards, in many cases, it will make the life span better. Notwithstanding, few firms worried about their short-term pursuits, we're able to make regulations to help the organizations to check out business ethics as an important factor to help make the company revenue and help the company long-term survival. To make the good life, good future and achieve such goals, we encourage the command to turn into the right direction, to believe more about moral behavior when wanting to run the utmost revenue. BP's oil spill explosion tragedy is an example to tell us to practice firm responsibilities and protect the type environment. The security and health environment belongs to every individual. Because staff, employees and individuals cannot scope the environment regulations and protection and health conductions, the businesses, industries, comparative authorizations, and organizations must to do so.