After decades of war in Afghanistan at the end of 2001, initially attempts have been made by Afghans and foreign organizations to consult the Afghan people in order to build sizes in pace-building which was a great encouraging signal. However , the people in general are still too reluctant to speak of the suffering through the war. Instead, their current priority is usually to struggle to get economic success in the remarkably competitive post-conflict reconstruction business with its growing social injustice. This sensible attitude causes a basic issue. If the previous is certainly not addressed, work to build a lasting peace will be endangered. Because lessons from other post-conflict societies have shown, countrywide reconciliation plays a role in overcoming earlier times and reuniting a war-divided society. There are numerous ways to lead to peace, balance and tranquility in Afghanistan. To my personal understanding we need to give an incentive to these initiatives, this newspaper reviews a lot of issues vital for discussing and creating a strategy of national getting back together. Furthermore, there is also a need for a great indigenous Blanket concept or a basic term of a reconciliation process that can get engage to stay in desk with the right people at the right time. As we previously experienced and learned lessons from international experience with peace-building and national reconciliation thus an Blanket effort to initiate this kind of a process can be hardly needed. Moreover, to get narrowing the gap between your rival perceptions there is also a requirement of an Blanket 'Historical Commission'' such as excessive peace council to prepare the earth for peace-building and another reconciliation process and setup of an Cover mechanism of national reconciliation including the 'lessons lea...
... s have demostrated that success in the end depends into a large level on how well-balanced punitive and reconciling pieces are. In the event the punitive dimensions dominates, that fuels the will for vengeance. If the reconciliatory dimension is too much stressed, it erodes the victims' trust in the political procedure and causes reconditioned victimization, probably provoking another backlash.
Lastly, the standard lesson discovered from foreign experience is that reconciliation takes time. The greatest obstacle is to find the appropriate instant for initiating the national process. If it is done too early, it clears old ratings and aggravates the socio-political fragmentation. Whether it is done inside its final stages, it is likely to fail because perpetrators can no longer be produced liable and collective myths have become too deeply grounded in the culture and are transferred to the next era.