PLAGIARISM FREE WRITING SERVICE
We accept
MONEY BACK GUARANTEE
100%
QUALITY

Terrorism And Counter-top Terrorism In International Security Law International Law Essay

Terrorism and counter-terrorism in international security law

Terrorism is has a primary and significant effect on international security, the results of which are damaging on peoples enjoyment of their basic people rights including their right to life, good treatment of subjects and liberty. In addition, acts of terrorism are costly to the steadiness of governments, destabilize initiatives of civil societies, threaten peace and security, and prevent economic expansion and development. As far as most governments are worried, the security of their citizens is a simple human right hence they are doing whatever they can to be able to safeguard individuals appropriately. This paper researches on terrorism and counter-terrorism in the context of international security legislation. It puts the true situation of how perpetrators of terrorism and Point out agencies act in regards to to fundamental aspects of international security regulation.

Introduction

Terrorism is an extremely complex and demanding phenomenon to address. In up to serves of terrorism are strongly condemned by the international community, initiatives to address this sensation have been stained by differences in opinions together with competing concerns. Various key issues lay unsettled and the quest for solutions has become even more difficult because of the emergence of new types of terrorism. The international community remains challenged how to translate the claims of international humanitarian rules and well-elaborated declarations of international security regulation on the condemnation of terrorism into tangible options (in form of legal, politics, and military) that can efficiently mitigate the harmful results and ramifications of terrorist activities.

In up to terrorism directly influences on human protection under the law, States took lots of steps to counter terrorism and a few of these measures have posed severe risks to human privileges and international security law. For instance some state governments have used options such as torture and other gross functions in the name of countering terrorism, disregarding outcries from legal independent organisations that are in charge of detection and elimination of torture. On the other hand, some state governments have been accused of sponsoring works of terrorism in countries where they feel intimidated by grave mistreatment of their citizens credited to torture among other violations. Thus, they have got by themselves violated the international theory of non-refoulement; the respect for international security law has lacked its interpretation in international fight terrorism. Therefore that, there is an urgent need to generate national or even international counter-terrorism strategies that aren't only intended to detect and stop terrorism, and/or bring those responsible for these gross functions to book nonetheless they also needs to foster and protect human being privileges and international jurisprudence. Such options should be aimed to the conducive factors that promote terrorism, these includes; the absence of basic guideline of law, cultural tensions, politics extremisms, financial and religious discrimination, and most importantly the violation of individuals rights.

Terrorism and counter-terrorism in the face of international security law

Terrorism eliminates the prices that are put at the center of the United Nations Charter and other international bodies. These worth include: peaceful discord resolution, legal principles on armed turmoil and safeness of civilians, tolerance of other people's views and views, and the esteem for human rights. The negative effect of terrorism on human rights and international security has been known and noted at the uppermost level of the UN; specifically by the UN Basic Set up, the UN Security Council, and the UN Individual Rights Council. Specifically, Member Expresses have unambiguously arranged that terrorism: is a risk to the dignity and primary security of individuals and groups internationally, places the lives of innocent civilians in peril, creates a fearful environment, endangers important freedoms, and violate people rights and the essential rule of law. Furthermore, terrorism is highly linked to arranged crimes such as money laundering, drug and real human trafficking as well as illegitimate proliferation of nuclear, biological and chemical materials. All these are from the effectual participation in serious offences including assault, extortion, kidnapping, hostage taking and murder.

Moreover, terrorism perniciously effects socio-economic development of claims, eliminates friendly international relationships among Claims, and negatively effects the attempts of co-operation and peaceful co-existence among State governments, like the cooperation for trade, expansion and development. Terrorism also threatens the security of Areas as well as territorial integrity thus grossly violating the key points and ideals of the UN; this is a menace to the tranquility and security of the international community. This means that serves of terrorism must be suppressed by all means as an indispensable strategy for the upholding of peacefulness and security worldwide.

Both international and claims' human privileges laws showcase that, in exclusive situations, Areas wield positive capacity to take precautionary functional measures to protect individuals or groups whose lives are known (or suspected) to maintain danger scheduled to unlawful functions of other individuals or groups-these of course includes terrorists. Significantly, the state is obligated to ensure that personal security of its people, especially in which a threat is accessible or is suspected to can be found. To be able to accomplish their security mandate and with respect for human rights and the guideline of law, Says have a reserved right and responsibility of taking effective counter-terrorism actions, to avoid and avert future problems from terrorists and bring to reserve the ones that are responsible for these acts.

However, measures considered by Areas to counter terrorism present serious issues to the fostering and protection of human privileges. As the previous UN secretary general stated,

"We have to all be clear that there is no trade-off between effective action against terrorism and the safeguard of human privileges On the contrary, I believe that, in the long term, we shall discover that human privileges, along with democracy and social justice, are one of the best prophylactics against terrorism. "

Thus, the duty of Claims' to safeguard individuals and organizations of their jurisdiction as well as all other carried out in combating terrorism must be in tune using their responsibilities as stipulated in the international laws, notably international real human rights rules, humanitarian regulation and refugee regulation.

In retrospect, just as terrorism negatively affects human privileges, counter terrorism actions adopted by State governments too affect real human privileges. Since terrorism perniciously impacts on lots of fundamental real human rights, it is the responsibility of States to generate effective counter-terrorism strategies. They are the strategies that provide the dual purpose of protecting human privileges and the encouragement of Says' goals of protecting individuals within their jurisdiction. Following the 9/11 problems in 2001, the united states intensified its invasion on Osama and his allies. The UN Security Council on its part transferred swiftly to fortify the legal framework for global cooperation and unified steps against dangers of terrorism. The construction touched on key areas such as stopping the funding of terrorism, acquiring weapons of mass destruction from terrorists and the development of posting cross-border information for legal reasons enforcement agencies, alongside the establishment of an surveillance body, referred to as, the 'Counter-Terrorism Committee'. The later was mandated with the guidance of the execution of the laid down methods. As well as the UN's strategy, various local counter-terrorism approaches are also produced by organisations such as the African Union, the EU, the Group of Arab Expresses, and the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe among other.

States' obligations when countering terrorism

The international community has risen up to adopt measures that uphold the international humanitarian law as the primary foundation of the conflict on terror. It has been layed out in the United Nations General Assembly quality 60/288 that outlines the UN's Global Counter-Terrorism Strategy. Members resolved to take counter-top terrorism that comply with their respective commitments under international legislations- the international humanitarian rules, refugee legislation, and human privileges laws. The United Nations Global Counter-Terrorism Strategy asserts the relationship between human privileges and international security; this puts the adherence to individuals rights laws with the guts of the international counter-terrorism approaches. With this strategy, Member States dedicated themselves to respect human rights and also to follow the rule of law in their fight terrorism.

The United Nations General Assembly has adopted lots of resolutions with regard to terrorism since Dec 1972. It has been aimed at the measures utilized by Expresses and the UN in striving to eliminate global terrorism as well as those aimed at linking terrorism with human rights. THE OVERALL Assembly has pressured that the steps considered by Member Expresses must comply with their responsibilities under international security regulation.

Under the UN Charter, the Security Council has the main responsibility of making certain tranquility and security is taken care of internationally, this consists of actions that highlight terrorism as a menace to global peace and security. Since its creation, the Security Council has undertaken several counter-terrorism actions against States; this has been in the proper execution of sanctions. Says considered to be linked in a single way or another to certain sets of terrorism such as the Taliban and Al-Qaida.

Conclusion

The proven fact that there is absolutely no clear romance between global war on terror by means of counter-terrorism strategies and international security rules is regrettable. International security legislations recognizes the important frameworks that place human protection under the law and international jurisprudence in the context of terrorism and counter-terrorism. In addition, counter-terrorism measures used by Areas should prevent them from slipping into snare of violating international security rules as with the infringement of fundamental protection under the law and democratic privileges-the very privileges that terrorists flout and wish to wipe out. Presently, various counter-terrorism procedures have been carried out by States, especially since the heinous 9/11 episodes. However, such procedures are not fully in tune with the international humanitarian rules. This newspaper has specified terrorism and counter terrorism in the light of increasing concern by NGOs and local human rights organizations within the role of international security regulation in the warfare against terror.

More than 7 000 students trust us to do their work
90% of customers place more than 5 orders with us
Special price $5 /page
PLACE AN ORDER
Check the price
for your assignment
FREE