Posted at 12.17.2018
The Paleolithic Time was an interval of technology that originated from natural stone. The improvements of the Neolithic Age lead to new technology which introduced material tools. Also the Neolithic homes were built of dirt brick and were more secure set alongside the Paleolithic shelters. Their dwellings were built sturdier because the people lived more steady lives and there was you don't need to be so mobile. The invention of pottery was another big edge that the Neolithic people had within the Paleolithic people.
The Neolithic Revolution led to settlements and the progress of group living. Also, after the Neolithic revolution commenced more complex community situations led to improved and more complex varieties of communication. The Neolithic revolution also resulted in the development of governments and higher kinds of group because now that people were surviving in settlements they started separating the labor. I also think trade stemmed from this revolution because now people would now trade the excess food that they grew for other activities they didn't have. Lastly in my own view the Neolithic Revolution also lead to the differ from a matriarchal classification to a far more patriarchal classification.
2. The Caste System got many advantages and disadvantages. The first downside in my judgment is usually that the weak were oppressed by the public and politically advantaged people in the name of beliefs and traditions. I also think the Caste System caused section and resentment that in turn developed into disunity among the list of Indian World. This made India weak against international invasion. The biggest drawback was that the caste system was predicated on birth alternatively than individual skill or skills. Lastly, I believe the Caste System created an individual class called the "untouchables" which were treated significantly less than human. An advantage to the Caste System is it played an important part in shaping profitable activities in Indian Society. This is made feasible just because a distinctive system of shared interdependence through a section of labor forms safety for those within a group. Another advantages was that every caste became a specialist in their own section of trade.
I think the Caste System mirrored Indian society in an exceedingly negative manner. The caste system at anytime is appalling, it is hypercritical, and without the sensation of affection. I think one major problem it triggered was a vitality struggle between your Brahmins and Kshatriyas. I believe the Caste System became an final result of real human greediness and arrogance and it progressed into an awfully harsh system of prejudice and domination.
3. The first tenet of Zoroastrianism is the opinion in a supreme and general god. He is the custom made, the maintainer, and he defends the nice from the wicked. The next important tenet of Zoroastrianism is the opinion in the duality of survival. Zoroastrians accept the actual fact that the earth is a fight zone between good and wicked forces. The 3rd tenet is the perception in the holiness of conception. The Zoroastrians imagine his conception is holy and wonderful so they feel it is everyone's job to keep it unpolluted and sustain order. The past tenet of Zoroastrianism is the notion in the divine persona of the planet earth and mankind. They imagine the material world comprising flames, water, atmosphere, mud, vegetation, nature, and humans are much like the body of God.
Zoroastrianism is very important because it is one of the oldest existing religions on the planet. Zarathustra teachings were notice by the ancient Greek and Roman theorists who had written about his life and teachings. Zoroastrianism caused the perceptions of Heaven and Hell; the idea that humans have free will encountered the common sense by God after death. It basically paved the way for the religions of Judaism, Christianity, and Islam. Before Zoroastrian's influence the Hebrew Bible made no reference point of the physical or emotional revitalization.
Christianity is thought to be trained through the teachings of Jesus of Nazareth and Zoroastrianism is trained through the prophesy of Zarathustra. These two religions have many similarities. The one similarity that stood out to me was that in both religions there's a perception in afterlife. Also in both religions there is a constant have difficulty between good and evil. The very last thing that stood out was the actual fact that each religious beliefs assumed that mankind should have free will.
6. When you compare and contrasting the religions of Hinduism and Buddhism you will first notice that both these religions originated in the South Asia region. The one thing that stood out to me was that even though they had similar traditions and values, that they had completely different ideas on concerns of social firm. The two religions also change on the ideas of the value of individual independence to progress both socially and spiritually. Another big difference is that there is not really a specific creator of Hinduism.
Buddhism was founded by Siddhartha Gautama in 563 B. C. and Hinduism is more of any collection of different religions and ethnicities. In Hinduism a person must live their life through Dharma which really is a sense of responsibility. Through this an individual can fulfill his tasks in world and the planet. In Buddhism a person must live their life through Dharma, without any social commitments but sets up a classification of right patterns and responsibility. That is done so a person can escape the pattern of suffering and rebirth or "samaras" and achieve nirvana. In both religions they believe in the process of reincarnation and the effects of Karma.
In bottom line, Hinduism and Buddhism both influenced India even though both affected it in dissimilar ways. The major way that Hinduism influenced India is by the Caste System. The Caste System is the order of interpersonal classes of India, and is still acknowledged by some in India, although it is now prohibited. Buddhism inspired India mostly with techniques of art with many sculptures that have been made in the likeness of Buddha. Buddhists cultured means of getting in touch with their internal identity through the approach of meditation. Buddhists thought in both karma and dharma. Hindus construe this as though reincarnated into a better social class arriving nearer to evading anguish would be possible.
7. The Pax Romana was a period of tranquility in the Mediterranean that lasted from the control of Augustus to the reign of Marcus Aurelius. The best outstanding characteristic of this period was the fact that there have been two hundred constant years of serenity within Rome. Under this peace time, Augustus was able to stretch his reign to Asia Small. The economy also prospered within this time around period by enhancing many harbors, building streets, clearing forests, and by turning unused land into farms. In my own thoughts and opinions this is also a time where there is an architectural revolution.
The Pax Romana was a time period that became a good example of five good rulers. The start of the Pax Romana began with the reign of Augustus and lasted forty-five years until his death. As ruler he was able to create a Roman Empire that possessed a more balanced base. After his fatality, Rome had a few years of bad rulers. In my view The Roman Empire wasn't totally unified during this time period. I also think the Pax Romana should not be spoken as the idea in time of Roman tranquility that your name itself advises. The Romans did remunerate wars during this period and there have been common strife's as leaders were assassinated and tyranny was fluent. However, it was a period of prosperity and progress in every sense.
There were many similarities between your Pax Romana and Han China empires, span, area, economic change, and territorial growth stood out if you ask me the most. However, in my judgment the distinctions are usually more interesting. Politics assimilation in China was obtained by the increase of Confucian ideals, people of the emperors, and a bureaucratic government. The powerful Roman legislation was emphasized over their fragile system of federal government. Mysticism of emperors was not as dangerous politically, even though many made case for the positioning. I think one of the greatest similarities is the introduction of technology and structures and also the change in authorities procedures. The major difference in my own opinion was the actual fact that the Roman Empire switched their government into a republic and Han China managed the structure of the Qin Empire.
8. The main accomplishments of the Roman Empire was how big is the empire, the progress of its bureaucratic system, plus they had one of the most well-organized, productive, and vicious armies that the world has ever before seen. In my view one major restriction that helped effect Rome's semester was that usually Roman armies' experienced more allegiance with their general than the state of hawaii. Personally i think this added to frequent civil conflict which plagued Rome during a big amount of its record. I also feel that an extremely advanced culture would be an achievement of Rome. I also want to include that another limitation is the fact that Rome suffered with a long amount of awful rulers and despite having the development of technology wasn't enough to hold this great empire together.
One key turning point in Roman Background was the overthrow of the Tarquin monarchy by Junius Brutus in 509 BC. After this Rome never turns back to a monarchy. The republic of Rome was then ruled by the Senate and its own assembly. I also think the Punic Wars were another major turning point in Roman record. Following the Second Punic Warfare, Rome paved the road for its electricity over Italy and proven itself as the primary electric power in the american Mediterranean. This bought about electricity and riches to almost the complete region. The past turning point I want to mention is the entire year of the five emperors. This was the turning point that in my opinion started out the drop of the Roman Empire.
I think Rome's legacy would be that they paved the way for european civilization. I also think the architecture of the Roman Empire was very prominent for its age ever sold. The Romans also contributed too many changes in British isles scenery. I also assume that a lot of Rome's books and writing has affected the world. Lastly, the Romans will be remembered because they had the best, well-organized, successful, and vicious armies that the globe has ever seen.