We accept

Strategic Management And Management Based Structure

Strategic Management is defined as the "process where organization's aims are set, procedures are developed and ideas are organized to attain these objectives". This involves the management to allocate resources to use the plans. Essentially, this refers to the most notable echelon of management within an organization which strives to supply the overall way of the whole enterprise to accomplish their set targets and goals. These obligations are usually performed by their CEO (CEO) and the executive team, led by organizational mission and vision claims.

The proper management is the on-going process that may be divided into several levels. First of all, an idea (strategy formulation) is established whereby the functions or purpose of a business is identified. This helps to condition and use the broad aims of the business. It involves determining the companies' proper advantages and key competencies, whether to target customer support, gross margin, research and innovations and the ideal technique to best deploy their resources to achieve their goals.

What is Command?

Leadership in a organization, in essence, is the action of leading an organization of folks or a business, in the showing and communicating of your vision to a large group. Leadership often comes in numerous styles, accordingly to the varied situations. In this instance, these styles could vary depending on situation, aims, and the group environment. Relating to Yukl, this first style identifies situational leadership which really is a trend that is reliant on the process/situation. The following is transactional authority whereby the leader is guided by the targets and adapts consequently to meet his/her goals. Furthermore, we have participative leadership which is a style which involves collaboration of employees to collectively provide insight to attain their task. And finally, we have transformational leadership is requires inspiring and motivating employees to talk about a common eyesight or goal.

How is Strategic Management linked with Leadership?

One might ponder the partnership between Strategic Management and Control. Managers today are filled up with many tasks and goals that can't simply be tackled with a single attitude or authority style in today's complex current market. As the restrictions of countries little by little diminish with increasing globalization, "the underpinnings of strategic management hinges on managers' understanding of competitors, markets, prices, suppliers, vendors, governments, lenders and shareholders, and customers worldwide". Thus, it's important for leaders to formulate a strategy to connect their quest or vision statement and allow the successful execution of these business activities. This process is concerned with preparing the long-term goals and objectives, that involves several things to consider such as:

Allocation of resources

Business to explore, make investments, and exit

Joint ventures or mergers

Expansions plans, getting into foreign markets

Strategic Management is tied to leadership in specifically in the implementation process whereby a company establishes their twelve-monthly objectives, devise policies, and set aside resources to ensure the successful execution of strategies. This involves devising a technique to instill a supportive culture, "creating an effective organizational framework, redirecting marketing work, preparing budgets, growing and utilizing information system and linking employee payment to organizational performance". In this particular implementation process, management would require employee dedication to follow-through with duties/project to in the end reach desired goal and outcomes. This is when leadership comes to the fore when employees lean on managers for his or her command and their potential to best utilize their skills and functions. Moreover, this includes the efficient use of resources to solve problems, and deliver alternatives in place. This hyperlink between proper management and management hinges on the utilization of different management styles to help make the best of real human capital to help the business succeed.

Management and Leadership styles - Impact on strategic decision

Royal Dutch Shell

Royal Dutch Shell (Shell) is a global oil and gas company headquartered in holland with registered office buildings at the Shell Centre in London, United Kingdom. It is the world's second-largest essential oil company assessed by revenues ($285billion) and is one of the six oil and gas "supermajors". Shell performs a global business and has procedures in "more than 100 countries and employs more than 102, 000 people worldwide". Founded in 1907, the company has grown substantially in a move to gain a competitive advantages with the dominant American petroleum company, Standard Essential oil.

Shell's strategy and priorities for the future are to activate in "more upstream and profitable downstream". "'Upstream' refers to the techniques Shell uses to find and extract conventional fuel out of the ground, while 'downstream' identifies the process of transferring these fuels through refineries and on to consumers, in both circumstances, in a socially responsible way". Shell's authority in helm is Chief Executive Officer (CEO), Peter Voser. He is reputable in the industry to be a great tactical thinker, a leader that leads through other people and character that would unlikely break Shell's traditionally consensual leadership style. He's a firm believer of safe practices and returning to the society, he once said: "An excellent safe practices performance maximizes not only our company performance, but also our position impact on how our employees and the neighborhood community see us". Mr. Voser is also passionate about investing in the introduction of graduates with ambition and creativeness to inject fresh thinking and lead to change. His style is to instill a set of core values - honesty, integrity and value for their people and foster a world of trust, openness, teamwork and professionalism and reliability.

Noble Group

Noble Group is Asia's largest diversified commodities trading company. It is a "market head in the management of the global supply string of agricultural, professional and energy products". In a mere two decades, the business has grown to become world innovator in supply string management and a particularly niche market "in the origination and delivery of tactical recycleables".

Noble's entrepreneurial origins are an important part of the defining feature as a business. The business advocates searching for and chasing opportunities, and take great pride in themselves in their humble origins to become global player in the product space it is today. Founded in 1987 by Richard Elman, CEO and Founder of Noble Group, Richard Elman embodies the true meaning of what entrepreneurship is about. He has gained significant amounts of admiration and a reputation for himself, known to be a realist, a visionary, and is constantly on the preach his humble roots to this day: "Our biggest risk remains ourselves. We just can't relax on our laurels, or deviate from what we do best. We have the right people in the right places and continue to open our entry doors to other appealing talent. Now is the time to keep to implement as flawlessly as possible and also to stay centered. We focus on advancement - not revolution. "

This is a head that can be an inspirational leader, and leads by example. In only 21 years, he has transformed and grown Noble Group from his preliminary $100, 000 of his own money into a $15 billion resource chain management business with offices in over 40 countries. A self-admitted inability in school with no great ambition, he came into the item business because he thought it was a great thing to do while enjoying his junior. In his business, he is convinced in people that are dedicated, talented and interested in making things happen. His style is to instill his eyesight and motivate his employees with words of intelligence. A firm believer of people, he is recognized to say "an enterprise is only as strong as folks who run it, and we strive to attract and wthhold the best talent".

Task 2

Leadership styles modified to different situations

In this day and age of modern society, competition exists in every range of business and in this battle to garner more efficiency and success, a good management team can certainty make all the difference. It really is no solution that organizational leaders today are confronted with dozens of sophisticated issues. Their success is tied to their potential to motivate their employees and package with issues in the most effective way. In order to do this, leaders would have to adapt their leadership styles to match the needs of the organizations where they function. That is probably one of the hardest things to realize. But I really do think that when some may be confronted with an intricate situation involving folks of differing backgrounds, different control styles should be implemented to address these different situations. In general, there are three traditional types of leadership style:

The Laissez Faire Command Style

The Autocratic Leadership Style

The Participative Leadership Style

"One aspect of management style worried about the control and the understanding of how much control you need to share with people". The Laissez Faire authority style infers a relatively lose form of control where much autonomy is directed at employees, while the Autocratic leadership style is the immediate other, and the Participative Authority Style s slightly in between. In my research completed on Royal Dutch Shell and Noble Group, the command styles adapted in different situations can be plainly offered in this table:

Royal Dutch Shell

Business Functions

Leadership style adopted

Shell's key mandate to concentrate on its strategy of "More Upstream, Profitable Downstream. "

Autocratic leadership style where a directive from the top is given in their implement of the strategy.

Set priorities because of its businesses to secure progress, and to regularly deliver in all its businesses and projects.

Participative authority style should be followed here whereby its operational efficiency and assignments are monitored with persistence and through opinions loop, so clubs could cohesively work at achieving the focuses on.

Shell working towards providing cleaner energy and play a part in securing a fresh low-carbon energy future.

Laissez Faire command style is modified here since this calls for the near future which requires managers to react to the changes and innovations to handle the obstacles.

Meet rising energy demand with lower CO2 emissions and play a role in encouraging effective CO2 procedures.

Participative control style should be followed here whereby this situation requires working together with governments and sharing technological know-how.

Noble Group

Business Functions

Leadership style adopted

Noble's core strategy to follow a "practical" method of business.

Participative authority style that see employees at every level working alongside one another cohesively to access their objective.

To create a diversified network of "asset-medium" resource pipelines, overseen by experienced professionals with specific industry knowledge.

Autocratic control style in which a directive from the very best is given in their use of their strategy.

Integrate their logistics services together to fulfill a critical role in their pipeline strategy, to ensure soft and reliable copy and delivery of recycleables.

Participative command style should be followed here whereby this involves working mutually through carrying out a framework to meet up with the aims of the logistical needs.

More than 7 000 students trust us to do their work
90% of customers place more than 5 orders with us
Special price $5 /page
Check the price
for your assignment