Posted at 11.25.2018
There a wide range of different buildings for different organisations. I will be explaining the existing structure of social services and am going to explain the result of the management framework whilst taking a look at the primary services that main sectors have to offer. I will explain the functioning of one social work setting up and analyse the impact of public work with regards to a specific group. I will use a recent case for my chosen sector and evaluate the failings of the cultural services, who those failings effected and what has been done since to ensure it does not happen again.
http://www. nhssb. n-i. nhs. uk/structures/social_services. gif
Above is an example of how the Sociable Services Hierarchical structure looks. It uses the layout of your pyramid and derives into the base of personnel level employees with usually the CEO or director at the top. There are many pros to having an organisation framework such as this. It allows employees to see plainly who it is they need report to and makes obvious their levels of responsibility. This is critical to a communal service organisation to safeguard not only themselves but their service users. A hieratical system, however, will also have its down sides. It stimulates rivalry which could distract some who are especially competitive. Martin, J and Fellenz, M (2010) suggest "Often Hierarchies are manufactured not because they're functionally required but because they offer a location for pressing unwanted people up in the organisation or for providing promotional avenue. These dysfunctional hierarchies are actually the cause for reduced organisational effectiveness"
Another common example of organisational constructions is Matrix. The matrix structure groupings its employees by function and product. The design of this structure is rather chiseled compared to that of the hierarchy. They usually work under the head of a project manager but also have a functional brain who they might are accountable to. An advantage of this is the fact that it allows employees to specialise in a particular field but will often also cause confusion concerning who to are accountable to.
Ealing public services offer a number of services: childcare and early on years, blue badge structure, child protection and safe guarding, welfare benefits - low income, fostering and adoption and good care homes. Im going to check out Child cover and safe guarding. Below is the hierarchical structure that Ealing use for his or her Children in need team:
Again it is clear to see who is in control and who each employee needs to record to. At the top there are the team professionals; below them is the deputy team manager. The deputy would be responsible for reporting to the team administrator. Below the deputy there the social workers and mature social staff who are both in charge of confirming to the Deputy team administrator. Below them there are social staff member assistants who are accountable to the social staff and senior cultural workers.
Ealing Interpersonal services children in need team (2011) condition on the website: Children in Need team give a cultural work service to families where children are considered to be 'in need' as identified by section 17 of the kids Take action 1989. They work predominantly with: Children whose titles are on the kid coverage register, children deemed to maintain need of family support services scheduled with an assessed level of need and children with a disability that's not regarded to be 'severe and deep' - the latter are referred to the Children with Disability Team. Social workers will evaluate family needs and draft a family support package deal with parents to enable children to be easily and effectively cared for within their families. The team want to improve the lives of the service users by providing a support that can be empowering. They have a responsibility to ensure children and young people who may be marginalised are safeguarded whilst promoting their welfare. They have other teams who they work in partnership with including the Youth Offending team who try to prevent re offending among youths and provide support for victims of young ones crime. These statutory organisations are funded by the government. Although these clubs do the best they can to improve the lives of marginalised children and youths, errors can and do happen. This can lead to severe results on not only the service individual but the company all together especially if you have not used the code of do provided by the public services.
There was an enquiry made intro the fatality of Victoria Climbie Who passed on aged eight on the 25th February 2000. She perished from multiple accidents. Marie-Therese Kouao was Victoria's Aunt and career she lived with her Partner Carl Manning from whom Victoria received vicious abuse from. In 1999 she was initially taken to a healthcare facility by her child-minder who suspected the lady had non accidents but the doctor accepted Kouao's tale that the wounds were self-inflicted by scratching at scabies sores. The kid protection regulators were alerted as a precaution. Sociable staff member Lisa Arthurworrey and Computer Karen Jones were given to the situation and conducted a home visit. Later the same 12 months Victoria was accepted to clinic again. This time around for scaulding to her mind and face. Immediately doctors suspected that these injuries were deliberately inflicted. Kouao informed Arthurworrey and Jones that the injury were scheduled to her pouring hot water over Victoria's check out stop her from scratching her head and that other injuries on her were caused by Victoria using utensils. These explanations were accepted by the child protection government bodies and Victoria was collected from clinic by Kouao. Data uncovers that Victoria was forced by Manning to sleep in the bathroom with just a bin liner. Within the same year of 1999 Kouao advised social workers that Victoria had been sexually assaulted by Manning but withdrew her statement the very next day. Personal computer Jones was to investigate this but after no answer the letter she sent to Kouao she required no further action. Early 2000 Victoria was again admitted to a healthcare facility. This time around for a combination of malnutrition and hypothermia and she was transferred to an intensive attention ward. She passed on the next day. DR Nathaniel Carey, the house office pathologist evaluated Victoria and found 128 different injury's and scars many of that have been cigarette burns. He identified what he found as "the worst circumstance of child abuse I've ever encounter. " Both Marie-Therese Kouao and Carl Manning were incurred with the murder of Victoria Climbie. When they were interviewed they both said that Victoria was possessed. These were sentence alive in prison for what Judge Howkins described as Victoria's "lonely slow death".
The death of Victoria might have been avoided had the correct decisions been created from those assigned to protect her. There have been gross failures of the machine. The inquiry survey confirms that there were at least 13 occasions where relevant services might have intervened and help Victoria nonetheless they failed to accomplish that. This intervention wouldn't normally have put heavy demands on personnel, or required great skill so that it is shocking to all or any that no action was ever taken. Another failing was adequacy of the system. Lord Lamming argued that "had Ealing, in my view, done the job they should have done on the second day that Victoria was in this country, it is possible that of the other organizations wouldn't normally have would have to be included. " He also remarked that at the time of Victoria's circumstance Ealing Sociable services were spending significantly below their Standard Spending Analysis (SSA) on services for children. Child protection services also failed Victoria by failure to implement the Children Function 1989. This is explained by Laming as a "basically sensible legislation". The primary seeks of the Action are: to bring together private and public law in one framework; to accomplish a better balance between protecting children and allowing parents to task state involvement; to encourage higher partnership between statutory regulators and parents; to promote the utilization of voluntary plans; to restructure the framework of the courts to help management of family proceedings. Acquired this take action have been applied it is nearly certain that Victoria's end wouldn't normally have been the tragedy that it was.
Not only performed these failings have a serious influence on the service individual resulting in her death. It also impacted the organisation all together. An inquiry was called following the conviction of Kouao and Manning. There were questions that were raised about the participation of social staff which Carole Baptiste, the Senior social employee for Victoria's case, failed to show up at. She was attempted for deliberately breaching an inquiry summons and was fined 500. Henry (2008) says "the tragic fatality of Victoria Climbie, in Haringey, as a result of her great-aunt and the girl boyfriend, sparked an unbiased inquiry by Lord Laming, a children's costs and structural changes to cultural services departments in the united states" A data source recommended by Laming was to be released that will have all the required details of 11million children including GP's, Classes and Social personnel working with them. There was also the appointment of an children's commissioner, the merging of council education and social services departments and the establishment of local safeguarding children planks, consisting of senior council representatives, social workers, law enforcement, education and health staff. The inspection of children's services in addition has been brought under Ofsted's remit. If a kid safeguard system has different buildings, systems and working in different areas, it has the potential to cause serious difficulties. Because of this there have been new local government structures introduced. There was also an indicator for a countrywide child protection organization but this is rejected. There was also a suggestion for a fresh Social services composition which is below:
Ministerial Children and Young families board
National Agency for Children and Families
(Children's Commissioner for England)
Local Member Committee
For Children and Families
Management Mother board for Services
To Children and Families
Director of children and families'
In final result the organisation framework for the Sociable Services is crucial to the soft running of the services they offer and to the safe guarding with their service users. If legislations and insurance policies are not implemented then the structure can fail not only the organisation however the service users. The Hierarchy system is still set up with the Sociable Services thus far and with the changes which have been implicated to not only the structure but the organisation as entire should ensure easy running in the foreseeable future with appropriate decisions being made by those who need to make sure they are.