We accept

Social School Is TYPE OF Social Stratification Sociology Essay


Social school is a kind of public stratification which influences on individuals' lives either negatively or positively. It identifies wealth, education level, profession and prestige of a specific group. Factors which are inter-connected are the gender, sexuality, race and abilities (McDowell et al. , 2013). It is important that social category be comprehended in the framework that it originates, mostly scheduled to factors which occur inter-connectedly as mentioned above. There are lots of concepts relating to social stratification, but for the goal of this essay I am going to concentrate mainly on Karl Marx's conflict theory, supplemented by Utmost Webber's functionalist ideology. In the same way factors such as education and employment will be central in this article. I assume that the acquisition of knowledge and prestige via employment plays an important role in determining an individual's lifestyle and eventually their life chances.


It must be observed that almost all of the study done by Karl Marx was based on westernized capitalist societies and it is primarily due to this idea that his concept of conflict theory is available in an financial realm or framework (Lenski, 2008). Marx demarcated school of folks in conditions of either lower, middle or upper category. In 'Manifesto of the Communist Party' Marx identifies lower-class societies as the proletariat and the upper-class as the bourgeoisie. The proletariat are a course of people who do manual labour which requires no specific skill, or simply put, they are the working (blue-collar) portion of world. The bourgeoisie use the working school society in order to increase their capital (Mohandesi, 2013). It is interesting to note that the positioning an individual discovers himself or herself relative to the above mentioned category, impacts on the life chances and thus their social school. According to Max Weber (Davidson, 2009) communal class and a person's life chances are interdependent. In such a sense, the higher an individual is positioned in the sociable hierarchy (school) the better his / her life will be; the contrary occurs for many who are in a poorer position. Factors include becoming wealthier, increasing one's prestige, the acquisition of knowledge and the improvement of a person's living conditions. They are known as cultural advancements or improvements.

According to a research review by Jean Anyon (1980) educational opportunities greatly improved as the socio-economic conditions of a specific communal group increased. Anyon (1980) in 'Friendly Category and the Hidden Curriculum of Work' discovered that institutions were organised in a manner which shows the social course of the families. Her results were produced from five schools which were divided into working-class, middle-class, affluent professional and professional elite universities. Furthermore Anyon (1980) concludes that skills and knowledge which moves toward social electric power or prestige are obtainable to children from higher public organizations but are inaccessible to the working class which are offered a functional curriculum. This review demonstrates the curriculum grooms children to complete an employment role suited to their social school or better put, so that the more challenging occupations are occupied by the most skilled and talented individuals. In this particular sense, lower class schools informed individuals in a way which requires them to check out orders somewhat than use their own effort and knowledge of the task. The focus on individualism boosts as the interpersonal class of the school increases. In my experience I concur using what Anyon has found because there is numerous types of colleges or institutions which range from specialized to managerial and professional. Good examples are the Cape Peninsula School of Technology, Cape Town University and The College or university of the European Cape. Marx also suggests that institutions are used to oppress the subordinates of any society, this assertion coupled with Anyon's research, exhibits a rather frightful image. Institutionally people are being altered and socialized, from a young age, to check out the layers of strata found in society.

Education ultimately leads to employment which culminates in the acquisition of prosperity or materials property. Matching to Potential Weber, the ownership of physical resources, which is obtained through production, creates unique characteristics in terms of the individual's life chances (Shortell, 2012). Furthermore, Weber feels that the possession of property is central to course differences and in cases like this there will be a romantic relationship between staff and employer or property renter and house owner. In our modernized capitalist contemporary society empowered by neoliberalism, emphasis is positioned on the acquisition of prosperity thereby stratifying contemporary society into upper-class abundant and the lower-class poor inhabitants. Within this sense one can improve one's cultural class by increasing prosperity as well as the ownership of property-making this an available societal system (opposed to the system of slavery). Job is therefore an opportunity to achieve prosperity and increase status, however, inequalities occur whereby a bread baker (no matter his skill) has less chances to boost his conditions than the owner of the bakery. Functionalists (Marxism) would dispute that economic disparity benefits nearly all society and is also an important element for the procedure of society all together (Lenski, 2008).


In my estimation, I see career as the second phase in a three period process in light of an individual's life chances. The first period being education and the last being a successful business proprietor or CEO. As mentioned above, the amount of education provided to individuals varies according with their socio-economic standing. This is actually the crux of my discussion due mainly to the manner where institutions shape world in preparation for his or her pre-planned future i. e. external forces of which they haven't any control over. A bogus consciousness thus is out there in the wild capitalist population whereby the proletariat was created to believe that they have got equal opportunities to boost their life chances, when in fact their original public class assists as a key which only starts a limited variety of doorways to success. Those who find themselves endowed with an increased social class are granted infinite opportunities to all or any components of success, prestige, riches, knowledge and finally advantages to better their life's chances.

More than 7 000 students trust us to do their work
90% of customers place more than 5 orders with us
Special price $5 /page
Check the price
for your assignment