Searching For Which means in Va Woolf's Between the Acts
I needed to examine the states on the limits of language; The moments where terminology breaks up... I needed to examine the language which manifests these says of instability because in ordinary communication-which is organized, civilized-we stifle these states of incandescence. Creativity and suffering contains these occasions of lack of stability, where terminology, or the signs of language, or subjectivity itself are placed into "process". (Julia Kristeva)
Any attempt to study the intricate layers from the human endeavor of "meaning-making" should include a great examination of these places where the spoken term (or connection itself) "breaks up" or fails. Woolf's Between the Functions is by itself a study in the struggle of relying on terminology to act as the sole money of relevance in a globe which will not be covered. The book does in reality put language, the signs of vocabulary, and subjectivity into "process". Consequently, "meaning" becomes complicated as it often falls outside the house, (but not really entirely), of ordinary talk and presentation. "Meaning" wedges itself between words; it really is found in the silences between two personas, in the being interrupted of a speech by breeze, in the sociable taboos which can make the unsayable so much louder than the stated. " sort of meta-discourse comes forth in Between the Acts, one which pushes the conventional foreground (i. e. the characters themselves and their conversations) of a novel into the background. This inversion places human beings in a wide dialogue the characters themselves, (and possibly we the readers), may well fail to identify as a conversation because it truly does fall outside of normative, controlled language. It really is in this bigger context of silences a great...
... ess process.
In the traditional narrative of resolution, there is a perception of find solutions to problems... a kind of ratiocinative or emotional teleology... "What will happen" is the simple question. In the modern plot of revelation, nevertheless , the emphasis is elsewhere, the function of the talk is never to answer the question or even to pose it... It is not that events will be resolved (happily or tragically) but rather which a state of affairs is revealed.
Julia Kristeva, 'A Question of Subjectivity-An Interview', Women's Assessment, no . 12 (1986), pp. 19-21
Ferdinand de Saussure, From Study course in General Linguistics, Modern Literary Theory, Third Ed. (1996), Ed. Rice and Waugh, pp. 8-15
Jacques Derrida, 'Structure, Sign and Be in the Discourse of the Human Sciences', Modern Literary Theory, Third Ed. (1996), Ed. Rice and Waugh, pp. 176-190