Scavengers and Nothing's Altered. Two very different poems, written by
two completely different poets, both of whom compose with regards to their own
cultures, skills and areas of beginning
SCAVENGERS and NOTHING'S IMPROVED
Scavengers and Nothing's Changed. Two completely different poems, authored by
two different poets, both of whom write with regards to their own
cultures, qualification and places of origins – every one of that are incredibly
different. What could these two poetry have in common. Ostensibly
nothing. Scavengers is simply regarding the sociable divide between
upper and working classes, whilst Nothing's Changed speaks of a young
man's anger by being discriminated because of his colour. Although after
your most superficial disection it is easy to see the interconnection
between these two poems. Nothing's Changed's angry young man is
obviously a victim of other lenders racial bias, but the two bin
men of Scavengers are also subjects of misjudgment, looked down upon by simply
the middle and upper classes because of their job, their monetary
situation, their parents.
There's your initial shared motif. Then you received the second: hypocrisy.
The hypocrisy theme operates strong in both poems. In Nothing's Changed
it's that this poem takes place after having a law had been passed against
racial elegance. Laws change. Attitudes don't. There might not be
a sign for the door denying the young boy entry, for it can be an unsaid
law that he is rebelling against. He can rebelling against the
attitudes from the people inside resturant. With Scavengers it truly is
the entire American Dream that is certainly called in question and shown up to
be what: a rest. The American Dream is the fact anyone, regardless of the
class, creed or cable connections, can whatever it takes, be nearly anything. A person
born into poverty and raised within the streets can rise to become president.
Most it takes is difficult work, and you could be whomever you want to be.
Which is, of course , a lie. The present president of the United States
is actually a straight C student. In this country, he might have scraped into
6th Form by the skin of his teeth. He may have got to be a office
desk jockey for the paper product owner. But in the US, he's the son of a
former chief executive, argo – he's president. Of course , blood has absolutely nothing
to do with that *please read with dripping sarcasm in mind*. The poem is usually
quite clear in it's meaning: The American Dream Can be described as Lie! Great
Hemocracy? Great Hipocrisy.
There's another thing that connects the two poems. It's the idea that
a large number of people during these unfortunate positions often impede any sort of