We accept

Presenting Outcasts WITHIN THEIR Societies English Books Essay

Holden Caulfield with the Catcher inside the Rye and Charlie in the Perks of Being a Wallflower are two young adults both suffering from the angst and ambivalence of their teenage years. They both struggle to deal with maturing and dropping their innocence. Perplexed by the vagueness of the changeover from child years, to adulthood they cannot order their chaotic experiences; stopping them from becoming members in their individual societies. Wanting to simultaneously live life and escape using their company growing tasks, both characters find it difficult to fulfil their craving for intimacy as they are left withdrawn and estranged using their societies and compelled to undergo as outcasts.

Throughout their have difficulties both Holden and Charlie become trapped in between trying to live their lives and operating from it. Holden will try to progress along with his life and attempts to get experience as confirmed by his face with a prostitute, where he would like to have sexual intercourse with her to cross the boundary of innocence but he's struggling to so makes an excuse saying he's recovering from a significant operation. He's unable to perform. Despite his brave look at Holden is unwilling and eventually unable to spend the what could be looked at the final factor of his innocence. He is unable to confront his growing duties which in turn causes him to hightail it to NY; escaping from his normal life for some time, avoiding immediate confrontation with his parents about his expulsion from school. Charlie, like Holden, is caught in between trying to live his life and jogging from it. He endeavors to understand the world around him and get involved but is left declined and dislocated triggering him to regress socially and get away by using drugs and alcohol. Like Holden, Charlie does not confront his fears; this is mirrored through Charlie's thought. He's a deep thinker and is also extremely inquisitive and curious but does this through fear of participation.

Holden and Charlie are evidently alienated and isolated of their respective societies. Not surprisingly similarity in their situations, the circumstances with their exclusion are contradictory. Holden is more accusing of culture and men and women for his corruption and exclusion. He blames the hypocrisy of parents and the problem of world for his loss of innocence. Chbosky however gives Charlie a more self conflicting frame of mind towards his isolation. Charlie is more concerned with his own flaws and regularly questions his own identity and almost blames himself for his exclusion. Even though Charlie is not absolutely innocent, as the youngest of three children he was too 'pristine' which maximised his vulnerability. By far the most startling moment in time of the e book is when the audience can deduce what really took place to Charlie in his past. His Aunt Helen didn't love him in the way most people expected - maternally - rather she sexually abused and molested Charlie as a child because of his susceptibility and convenience. This shows how his impeccability made Charlie a victim of situation.

Both Salinger and Chbosky choose to portray outcasts almost as anti heroes as both Holden and Charlie have got anti heroic features. Holden is shown as a weakling; easily beaten up by Stradlater and Maurice, who leave him bleeding and crying on the floor. He's pictured as a coward, fearful to look in a team when he perceives two "tough folks" developing and is afraid to call Jane Gallagher, frightened her parents might answer the phone. He is a friendless failure who flunks out of institution. Throughout the book, Salinger exposes Holden to be prone and helpless time and time again. It is a classic pathetic picture, an adolescent with no self-confidence no route who clings to childhood simplicity unable to find a location for himself on the globe. Charlie; like Holden is a weakened character who does not think him self extremely competent. He uses thought to avoid contribution. Charlie feels he is incompetent as he frequently questions his imperfections asking "What's wrong beside me?" which ceases him from taking part. He is emotionally immature as he often responds to adversity through attempting to escape actuality as shown through his mistreatment of drink and drugs in response to his thoughts of angst on the fatality of his closest friend and the grief of losing his aunt, instead of confronting his troubles. Charlie has the challenge of being inconsiderate of other people's feelings, which damage his relationships. Struggling to devastate his girlfriend by telling her the truth about his emotions for Sam he instead decides to continue a false romance with Mary Elizabeth not conversing his true thoughts. He kisses Sam before Mary Elizabeth throughout a game of spin the container finally facing up to his true thoughts. Charlie will not dwelling address how he feels and does not talk to Mary Elizabeth. By doing this he hurts Mary Elizabeth and himself, just through a simple lack of communication. Both Holden and Charlie are misunderstood by others in world as a result of intricate combination of immaturity and innocence and their rejection of conformism.

Holden Caulfield is constantly pestered by phonies. He is apparently trying to determine his own personality in a world of conflicting attitudes in which he feels there is absolutely no guidance for him. He is portrayed by Salinger almost 'prophet like' through how he moves judgement over everybody else. Felt to have higher moral values than those around him, he is often extremely judgemental.

In compare Charlie is different extremely as he is more of a thinker than person who makes judgements. Being truly a wallflower, he observes the qualities of high school society, noticing what a great many other average teens tend to miss as he strives to decipher the complexities of his environment.

Despite their intelligence both Holden and Charlie have difficulties organising their encounters. Each protagonist has some form or another of experience, they are not completely innocent. However due to their insufficient maturity they are unable to make judgements on their experiences and study from them, thus avoiding them from joining society and going out of them dislocated as outcasts in modern culture. William Wiegand advises oddly enough that "These major protagonists have a religious health issues, "banana fever, " which renders them not capable of distinguishing between significant and insignificant experience - not capable of mature judgment, quite simply". In Holden's case "banana fever" is seen through his grief in the loss of life of his brother Allie. Struggling to recover and discover other relevance in his life, other than innocence he's against many aspects of American culture and finally against the corrupt population he lives in. As he clings to his imagine preventing the increased loss of innocence in others he becomes less able to make adult judgements, his rejection of maturity and responsibility make him an outcast. Charlie also suffers similarly to Holden as he's unable to order chaotic experience in his life. His inability is reflected and tested through the novel, specially when he's kissed by Patrick and is also still left questioning his sexuality. He is unable to separate whether it is a significant enough experience to determine his sexuality.

Charlie and Holden have problems with the ambiguity of their teenage years as they struggle to make the transition from childhood innocence to maturity searching for owed in modern culture. Charlie unlike Holden seems enthusiastic to gain the understanding of the world around him. He often questions why things will be the way they are which is usually left dissatisfied with the replies he will get, as seen on the occasion when he frequently asks the question "why?" to his algebra professor. Charlie's persistence will not pay back as his tutor eventually becomes irritated by his query and he's advised to just accept what he's advised, without question or question. Using this method he achieves a high quality in his test but feels he has not learnt anything. An instant of realisation for Charlie takes place when he's advised by his mother "We allow the love we think we deserve" a lot becomes clearer to Charlie as he is able to order his experience and learn from them from then on instant. Holden however is more unwilling to comprehend his surroundings. He is regretful and instead does not desire to posses the data he will. Holden does not want to comprehend the globe around him because understanding the world means interpreting it and finally receiving it, this sorts the foundation of Holden's level of resistance as he's instead in pursuit of a far more 'significant' goal as he endeavors to prevent the increased loss of innocence and the further corruption of world through safeguarding children.

It is remarked by Warren France, that the misfit protagonist is often portrayed as imaginatively gifted but actually handicapped, which suggests why these people are powered in upon themselves. French's remark represents Chbosky's and Salinger's portrayal of misfits carefully. Both Holden and Charlie are imaginatively gifted, and are capable of profound thoughts and needs however when it comes to placing them into practice they can be less successful. Both idealists and optimists in their own respects they make earnest attempts to extend themselves into modern culture and to improve culture but are often awarded with rejection yet valiantly continue using their seek out intimacy.

Both Holden and Charlie have problems with being outcasts in society. However their alienation isn't necessarily completely negative. In Charlie's circumstance it is more harmful, it can even be argued that Holden suffers to an equal or greater amount however there may be more information to suggest Holden is better and even more resilient therefore of alienation whereas Charlie is in the beginning fragile because of the death of his friend Michael and becomes more and more so as the novel progresses. Holden has a well developed sense of judgment which it seems arises as a result of his isolation. His strong sense of judgment helps Holden package with adversity whereas Charlie is more observant than opinionated. His isolation makes him reluctant and speculative, a complete opposite to Holden almost. For both protagonists their alienation is obviously a way to obtain weaknesses and strengths, in Holden's case the advantages outweighing weaknesses.

The Catcher in the Rye plus the Incentives have both been subject to acclaim and criticism and are actually viewed as basic principles of common American literature despite some controversy. Among the questions that Jonathan Yardley from the Washington Post asks is "How come Holden Caulfield almost universally viewed as 'a image of purity and awareness?'" Among the reasons Holden is so attractive to the reader despite his many failings, is because he signifies our yearning for what Freud would term "The Pleasure Rule. " The pleasure theory is a psychoanalytic notion, originated by Sigmund Freud. The pleasure process states that folks seek pleasure and avoid pain, i. e. , people seek to satisfy biological and mental health needs. A person's id practices the pleasure principle and rules early life, but, as you matures, one learns the need to endure pain and defer gratification, due to exigencies and obstructions of reality. In Freud's words, "an ego thus educated has become reasonable; it no longer lets itself be governed by the pleasure rule, but obeys the truth process, which also at lower part seeks to obtain pleasure, but pleasure which is reassured through taking bill of reality, even though it is pleasure postponed and diminished". Charlie is also fascinating because of his 'Holden-esque' qualities. The Catcher within the Rye is stated as an effect by Chbosky. The Benefitsis also dubbed by some critics as a 'modern day Catcher within the Rye'

With such large appeal both texts carry and the ways in which they capture children it appears ironic to spell it out Holden and Charlie as outcasts. However they suffer because they are abandoned by youth yet unprepared for adulthood. Many authors have attempted and didn't explain this confusing and alienating condition whereas Chbosky and Salinger succeed in creating an archetype that defiantly captures the complex areas of growing up. We observe how both protagonists are all of a sudden pulled out of a world that these were comfortable in and thrust into a terrifying world where all the consistent elements they had taken comfort in no longer exist or are diminished; abruptly burdened with the obligation to, not only understand the workings of the new world unfolding but also to incorporate themselves into it something which has affected children profoundly whatever the generation or age group they live in.

Holden is an associate of the 1950s fatigued with life in the world of post-WWII America. Whereas Charlie is a kid of the 90s, growing up in a swiftly developing and fast paced population with major revolutions occurring in communication. Both works of literature, however, present us with an extremely similar general attitude. The main persona in each one of the books screen the same "symptoms" of introversion, defeated idealism, disillusionment and a desire to have isolation and intimacy, creating a strong connection over the two eras.

More than 7 000 students trust us to do their work
90% of customers place more than 5 orders with us
Special price $5 /page
Check the price
for your assignment