We accept

Philosophy - love of wisdom


The Greek expression "philosophy" (philosophia) is a chemical substance word, composed of two parts: 'Philos' (love) and 'Sophia' (intelligence). It literally means love of intelligence. The first part of the term viewpoint philos is easy to comprehend which denotes a "fondness for" or "attraction to. " To love something is to place it at the level of likeness, so the one who adores wisdom will consider it valuable to look for. The problem arises at defining the word Sophia (wisdom). The word is not easily explained. The historic Greeks believed that knowledge is beyond the reach of individuals; it didn't come by natural means to the human beings. Old Greeks assumed that wisdom was unapproachable to the normal people however the highly intellectual individuals were with the capacity of it which was exceptional, so that highly valued. Based on the ancient greek language philosophers like Socrates, idea was knowledge of things just how it certainly were as the things appears to be. Thus, this eagerness to question everything and persistence to accept nothing at all less than the reality led to the controversy up against the Athenian jury and for that, at the age of 70, Socrates was sentenced to death.


Socrates, the typical for many consequent Traditional western philosophers, was born in fifth century, 469-399 B. C. E. Since he thinks knowledge is a living, interacting thing that's why left no literary work of his own and for his work in neuro-scientific philosophy we could dependent upon modern freelance writers like Xenophon, Plato and Aristophanes about his life and work. When he was the pupil of Archelaus, he was thinking about the scientific theories, but later he shifted his interest from the quest of the physical world to the introduction of moral personality.

"The unexamined life is not the worth living. "

Socrates was the young young man when Pericles, a liberal politician, arrived to power. To market democracy, he created public courts. Growing in this culture of liberalism and democracy, Socrates group of values and values were opposite and very different from his fellow resident. Socrates was against democratic world. He often looked arrogant and didn't seem to be bothered by the effect of alcohol or cool weather- this made him suspicious among his fellow men. Though, unlike his appearance, he was hugely intelligent. He made clear that individual is more than his appearance. He presumed in the substance not in the exterior view of man. He was considered as an irregular Athenian because he never attended state's assemblies like other people. Instead he would wander in the complete city and employed himself in a critical conversation with aristocratic young man of Athens and persistently questioning the young Athens about the popular fact. Many would find Socrates teachings to be too radical for youth aristocrats. Socrates dropped to simply accept any fees for his coaching from students and because of his denial for material success; many pupils were greatly influenced by his teachings. Among those were: Aristophanes, Plato and Xenophon.

He thinks that reflective life will probably be worth living and the intellectual life was greater than bureaucratic political life or the life span bottom part on sense experience. He offered credit to raised awareness and higher worth rather than standard culture and awareness as the rest of the Athenian did. You might suggest that normal consciousness is bad or can say least good. Even when the good is trained to the contemporary society, conventional authority will promote the least denominator in society and therefore, the best struggles to accomplish. The Good society based upon rationality not on the convention which is opposing of the Good. Such culture would neglect personality and individual reflection and reasoning.

For Socrates, ignorance is a disease of soul. It restricts the soul from operating properly. The people of Athens were ignorant but the majority of all, they didn't imagine themselves as ignorant. He said that accepting ignorance and knocking down the deception that people already know the entire world perfectly as it is, then we find a truer knowledge. Socrates thought that virtue is untouchable because we are habitual to do what we consider to be truth. Unacceptable behaviors will be the consequence of ignorance rather than the symptoms of weakness of the will.

In The Apology by Aristotle, Socrates never says he "follows" God. Instead, he considered himself as a gift of God to Athens. He had not been like a person who employs God as he deemed himself as the expansion of him or messenger of God. In "the apology" there is certainly data which support to comprehend Socrates as not compelled to follow God, but drawn to follow him. Socrates says that through "oracles and dreams" his God orders him to awaken his fellow Athenians, when he says he was posted by the God as a philosopher, we sense that he feels strongly compelled but not forced to follow his God's ideas for him. Socrates maintains constant company with God, who orders him to reside a life of materially poor but also with the feeling that he's important to both God and the folks of Athens.

In 399 BC, he was put to death by the Athenian democracy on the demand of corrupting young thoughts and worship to new deities other than the city's god. He thought that every resident owed his express obedience in every matters which didn't contradict his conscience. He refused offers to flee from the jail or exile from metropolis on the reason why that he firmly follows the regulations of the expresses; to break the state's law will result in dangerous undermining of the power of regulation. He contends that the unmanly and pathetic routines of pleading for elementary disgrace the justice system of Athens. Instead Socrates provocatively says his jury that he's a hero. And he'd be alternatively put to death than to stop his soul-saying:

"Men of Athens, I honor and love you; but I shall obey God somewhat than you, even though I've life and strength I shall never cease from the practice and coaching of beliefs. "

Socrates drank hemlock and passed away in the company of his friends and pupils. He revealed the world the meaning of integrity and moral determination by agreeing to the death word alternatively than recanting his principles.

In conclusion, Socrates was a remarkable man of logical. He brought the trend in ideas of the normal people. His moral philosophy still has its significance in today's world. Despite the fact that he never rests right down to write any of his viewpoint, never require any favor from his peers, Socrates still keep in mind as an eminent philosopher of traditional Greece.


The fatality of Plato's mentor Socrates has been the turning point in Plato's life. He was not more than thirty years old when his instructor was imprisoned. At Socrates trial, Plato and other three pupils were prepared to pay the fine to the court as he belonged to the affluent family in Athens. But to his disappointment, judge denied to improve their mind. Following the fatality, many questions haunted Plato's brain about the world, freedom and the machine he was living in. subsequently, he spent the rest of his life answering these question.

He never designed his profession as a philosopher however, after Socrates fatality; he dedicated his very existence to the beliefs. He travelled so far as to Egypt then Italy, where he studied and spent several years teaching the ruling category of Syracuse. On time for Athens, he founded a school, the first school in the western world. He known as it academy that was located outside the city surfaces. Throughout his life, Plato remains in the Academy, coaching and working on his philosophical writing. Among the most famous was his publication named "Republic". In this book, he tried to give the answers of his own questions like; he argued that "society could not be just unless people who have philosophical perspective became rulers". He attempts to put into practice this goal but he failed and hardly escaped his life. Plato delivered to the Academy and sustained instructing until he passed on peacefully around 348 or 347 B. C.

Ethics was Plato's passion. He learned from Socrates' fate that good people won't survive until the world itself transform. Therefore, politics was of major matter in Plato's school of thought. He believes that the answers of our ethical and politics questions could be found in fact itself. Plato was the first ever to attack the problems of epistemology.

Plato theory of knowledge was different from the other philosophers. He didn't imagine knowledge as relative as sophist presumed. He believed our lives and modern culture should be bottom part on general knowledge. He denies knowledge bottom on sensory experience because he argues that knowledge should be eternal and unchangeable and should be grounded on rationality. He further says that if all the judgment are right than exactly what will be the difference between your thoughts and opinions of expert that is based on research and reasoning and the layman. Plato's point is that not all judgment has identical value.

He rejects the data that is derived from sensory experience. He argues that everything we believe holds true today might not true after sometimes. And these sensory knowledge is again relative for the perceiver which differs from others point of view.

Plato assumed that justice should be set, if not, then sophists were right about the justice being mere audio and air of puffs. Justice is something real, objective and nonphysical. If not, then there would be no real difference between Hitler and Saint. He also enlighten with the difference between knowledge and opinion. Belief can either be true or bogus but knowledge must be true. But we can't say that true notion is knowledge. Because it does not have a ground, it could be an arbitrary think or coincidence. Knowledge must be grounded in some sort of rational insight.

Plato uses the word "idea" in subjective sense which is also called Plato's "theory of idea". Platonic ideas are realities that exist independently of the intellects that know them. He uses another term for ideas, which is "form". This form doesn't necessarily make reference to the form of objects.

Plato presumed that prior to the soul entered in our body, we've innate knowledge of what's ultimate truth but when we enter in the materials world we forgot this knowledge. That is why we feel imperfect without ultimate knowledge. This knowledge of the form is still there longing to be retrieved by the procedure of recollection.

Plato tried to solve the challenge of change by reducing between the Heraclitus and Parmenides. He is convinced that there are two different kind of reality. There's a world in constant flux and at the same time there is an eternal and unchanging world. The globe in flux is the physical world that we encounter through sense experience. As well as the other is the non physical fact or can say the intelligible world which is base on rationality.

One of his values was that each human beings are not self-sufficient, plus they need someone to survive with. To help ease in life, we get together into neighborhoods which form societies for common goals and interest. This succeeds because we can work more efficiently. The only real idea was the ideal of universality no individualism.

Plato conceived a thorough philosophy that solved the questions of ideas, politics, knowledge, aspect, cosmology and ethics. He was one of the most penetrating, wide ranging and influential philosopher of background. He has wonderfully displayed the political events and movements of his period in his works.

Despite some issues that Plato never in a position to solve, his theory of Form turned out to be one of the far reaching idea in the annals of thought. This is still true that western beliefs is unintelligible without understanding Plato.


Aristotle, the daddy of the literary criticism was created in fourth century B. C. he was one of the brilliant learner of Plato's Academy where he spend two decades of his life in studying. After the fatality of Plato, Aristotle came back to his local land Macedonia, gave teaching to the near future ruler, Alexander (the fantastic). He came back to Athens in 335 and built his own institution at the Lyceum, where he dedicated slumber of his life in teaching, research and writing.

He wrote a short treatise on poetry which is often known as Aristotle's poetics. This poem was the look at in the quest of truth, somewhat than mere assertion of pre-conceived countries. He is also known as "the author of ethics" and the creator of "logic". He creates extensive system of western philosophy which include morality, politics, reasoning, aesthetic, physics, meteorology, biology and metaphysics.

"Man is a composite nature of body and spirit, mind and matter, sense and intellect, passion and reason. "

He says that man is different from pet and other creature because of the reasoning. Man can think but canine can't. Because of this, man is above all other creatures. It's the reason that leads all things with their proper ends. The man is the Whole Man when he has realization and actualization of his vitality and potentials and it develop through the philosophy.

His theory of contemplation says that it's down to globe' it starts with the sense connection with the things all around us, combines observation within representation and meditation. It is stated that man constantly living a life of contemplation and habitually uniting himself with the exterior realties will never "die or age".

Man's perfection can not only be gained for knowledge sake but also to be used for the betterment of oneself. Efficiency was only be gained by the knowledge this means knowing and doing, what's best for you for the attainment of your happiness.

"It's the rationally planned activity of the complete man. "

His believes were identical to of his instructor Plato on the political beliefs that the ruler of their state to run government's affair should be philosopher.

He grouped knowledge and perceptions relating to what we see tangible such as an thing. Perhaps the main thinking was his classification of items. In physics he thought that the five instances are actually important. The fact that fire is scorching and it could be dry. The traditional main component could be earth that could be hot and cold. He further put his views about the air could be hot and damp and drinking water. His concepts on the substance and substance pertains to combination of both the matter and the form. He further put his views that the problem is only one component.

In Metaphysics, he will try to justify his opinion giving it the bottom in the abstract study to be. He completely turned down the Platonic theory of forms and defended his own eyesight of ultimate actuality.

On the subject of morality, he beliefs that we are morally accountable for only those activities that, our moral identity is the reason. He divided heart in two parts; the first is the logical and other is the irrational faculties. And they are recognized by their governing principles. Rational includes genuine reason (theoretical) and calculative reason (useful) whereas; in irrational faculties pleasure and satiety are located, which includes hunger soul (desire and can) and nutritive spirit.

He feels in the state of hawaii as the complete and argues that those who completely take part in their government is highly recommended as residents. He excludes employees given that they don't fully participate in their state activity because of insufficient time. He provided the thought of blended system, which is the mixture of democracy and aristocracy. This technique thinks that those who work harder should get more.

He believes that a tragic hero or ruler shouldn't be evil or virtuous. He must own some type of tragic that causes his ultimate and his downfall can't be the result of fate. He should be highly respected and looked up to. He should be go up to vitality or inherit the energy. He should be of good figure and must have the properties of manly valor. He should be consistently inconsistent. He should be logical.

In conclusion, you might claim that Aristotle was more methodical, both ideas and school of thought provide us with great insights on the globe. He helped to shape our present, though in no way directive our procedures.



http://www. abu. nb. ca/Courses/GrPhil/Introd. htm


http://plato. stanford. edu/entries/plato/


http://encyclopedia. jrank. org/APO_ARN/ARISTOTLE_384_322_BC_. html

More than 7 000 students trust us to do their work
90% of customers place more than 5 orders with us
Special price $5 /page
Check the price
for your assignment