Personal identity begins at this time of conception, within time personal identification can transform or not change. The change in identification differs in many instances by causes of mental, physical or environmental changes in the person life. As life progresses in time people have a tendency to change their views on many issues and personal information is involved with those issues. Way of life also play an important role on someone's present or preceding identity when you are exposed to different elements encountered within their mind while operating in these activities. The mind is the main influential part of any person to determine their personal information thru time present or future. The identification is very important for the well being of a person in their everyday life, at the job, and despite having their relaintionships.
When it comes to philosophy Personal Personal information is an extremely broad and intensive subject matter, many philosopher have their own views on the issue. On the other hand my personal choice for this paper has to be a very popular philosopher by the name of John Locke who was one of the greatest in European countries in the later 1600's and early on 1700's until his fatality. John Locker was born into the stage in Europe which was called the Enlightenment where he helped find the id of Thomas Jefferson to the thought of the Declaration Of Self-reliance by saying this "men are "endowed with certain inalienable privileges, and this among these are life, liberty and the quest for joy. " With these words stated by Thomas Jefferson, John Locke started his successful joy of Idea and the problem of Personal Personality.
As Locke clarifies his version of Personal Id he clarifies it in a higher power and often relies on beliefs, as opposed to science, to assist him in his major life decisions by using his personal identification. John Locke's views on personal individuality are lay out in the selection, "Of Identification and Diversity", taken from his Essay Concerning Human being Understanding. In this article he talks about humans are able to understand through the use of his theories and ideas. John Locke possessed his center of personal identification in Section 9 of his essay in which he declares his idea of one is that of a thinking, intelligent (logical) being with consciousness of itself (self-consciousness). The notion of a thinking brilliant being amounts to the. While John Locke acquired his judgment and theories on personal identity other philosophers do too. In reference point Identity is highly complex and it has no set explanation everyone agrees on. Sarup (1996) talks about identity by using the example of a passport. This might include a picture of the person as well as other details including nationality, someone's full name and date-of-birth. While a passport is a form of identity it does not communicate who you are as a person. It "show's you who you are so that you can be accepted in a bureaucratic sense" (Sarup, 1996). Sarup the author says " that id is regarding who one thinks you are, what one thinks and what one may". While Kidd another publisher feels that "identity" pertains to how we think about ourselves as people, how exactly we think about other people all around us and everything we think others think of us. In other words, the capability to "find out" (Kidd, 2002)who we are as a person. Kidd the other writer states that we are shaped by our culture, and we shape it and perpetuate in it inside our day-to-day lives. Although culture and personal information are often linked they are simply, in reality, different in lots of ways than one. "With culture representing the 'macro' design- the bigger picture- and 'identity' representing small more 'micro' meanings we've as individuals" ( Kidd, 2002, p. 7).
In my personal identity I have experienced many facets in my 25 years of residing in this earth. My own identity has been expanding each minute of your day, as well as days and nights on and in years. In my readings and research I personally coincide with writers who state that personal id is divided by two subsets. These two subsets are seen as a experience and learning. On the other hand to Lockes belief's I feel these two subsets characterize my own identity's growth. Matching to Wenger, id is seen as a negotiated experience, which is developed through proposal in practice in which gives us "certain experience of contribution and what our neighborhoods pay attention to makes us as members" (Wenger, 1998). "Identity used is described socially not merely since it is assumed in a cultural discourse of the self and of cultural categories, but also since it is produced as a lived experience of participation in the precise neighborhoods" (Wenger, 1998, p. 151).
Learning is a very critical item people should encounter because it benefits us over time as it pertains to your daily lives and personal encounters and relaintionships. The many things ive discovered thru out my years has attempt to my gain and my personal identity. While doing work for different companies and organizations my personal personality has differed in each environment because I had developed some other role in each one. Having different assignments in each of my jobs, my personal identification had to change in time in order for my tenure their to be successful and keep up with the rest of the laborers. According to the author Wenger "A feeling of your learning trajectory gives us means of sorting out what counts and what will not, what plays a part in id and what remains marginal" (Wenger, 1998, p. 155).
Whenever we speak of one's personal id we speak as what makes us the person that we are. Our identification consists of why is us unique and various as a person and from others. Corresponding to Locke personal personal information does not entail the body whatsoever, the individual could be involved by his soul. If such would occur Locke suggested that the person could be moved by his own soul. However personal individuality to Locke can't be equated with the personality of an thinking material either because the identity doesn't follow the id of the heart, but practices the set of individual thoughts it contains. Here's an excerpt of 1 Locke's essay where he claims the personal personal information would follow the thoughts themselves, rather than the thinking chemical.
" Let any one reflect after himself, and conclude, that he has in himself an immaterial Nature, which is whatever feels in him, and in the frequent change of his body keeps him the same;which is whatever he phone calls himself: Let him also suppose it to be the same soul, that was at Nestor or Thersites, at the Siege Of Troy. But he, now having no consciousness of the Actions either of Nestor or Thersites, does, or can he, conceive himself the same person with either of them? Can he be concerned in either of the actions?Attribute those to himself, or think them his own more than the activities of any man, that ever existed?But let him once find himself aware of the activities of Nestor, then confirms himself the same person with Nestor. "(Section 15). Since we know and read that Locke rejects that the personal information of a person is the identity of any immaterial material or spirit. For Locke at every moment you might have another type of soul, thoughts, or a different thinker but still have the same person see. (Section 25)
Another rejection by Locke is the theory the the identity of a guy is needed for the personality of the person. It wouldn't be necessary because you may have the same person in two different beings as he says in the Prince and the Cobbler history.
"For should the soul of a prince, carrying with it the awareness of the prince's previous life, enter and notify the body of your cobbler, when deserted by his own heart and soul, everyone sees he'd be the same person with the prince. "(Section 15).
For Locke personal individuality is not enough if it doesn't include the identification of consciousness. Relating to Locke consciousness is the ideas that a soul entertains, not in the soul that entertains them. The most important part of awareness is recollection, since ram can bear in mind the actions and encounters of some previous person, from the perspective of this person, then one therefore qualifies as similar with that person. To Locke he explains personal individuality as a "forensic" notion. (Section 26). Some philosophers and viewpoint get confused along with his identity of consciousness Locke stated"For since consciousness always accompanies thinking, which is whatever makes every one to be what he message or calls self, and therefore distinguishes himself from all other thinking things:in this along consists consists personal individuality and as far as this awareness can be extended backwards to any previous action or thought, up to now reaches the identification of that person;it is the same personal now it was then;which is by the same personal with this present the one which now reflects on it, that that action was done. "(Section 9).
Overtime John Locke has been criticized by his theories and his way of thinking by fellow philosophers and other entities. Thomas Reid has a view that is comparable to Descartes when a person who is a straightforward indivisible material that does not have any temporal or spatial parts. Thomas Reid states that "My personal identity means the continued existence of this indivisible thing which I can myself. Whatever this self may be, it is something thinks, and deliberates, and resolves, and acts and suffers. I am not thought, I am not action, I am not action, I am not sensing;I am something that thinks, and works and suffers. My thoughts, and actions, and feelings change every minute;they haven't any continues, but a successive, existence that do it yourself or I, to which they belong, is permanent, and gets the same regards to all the succeeding thoughts, actions, and thoughts which I call mine. " Reid argues that memory is the evidence for personal identity, however, not the basis of personal individuality. Reid developed several arguments which go against John Locke's ram is the basis of personal identification. The four main arguments that Reide should go against Locke are:
The Duplication problem which declares one individual may be identification with an increase of than one person.
The Brave Soldier Paradox which a man may be, and at the same time not be, the person that did a particular action.
The issue of removing reward abuse and responsibility.
The minor objection that confuses consciousness with storage.