We accept

Organizational structures during the twentieth century

In small level or medium size organizations people working will be limited to limited number so peer -to - peer connection and discussion with higher and lower level employees will be very recurrent and common so no predefined framework is required as delegation of varied responsibilities and decision making can be done with in person communications. However in the organizations where we've larger work groups to make any decision or delegate tasks a well defined structure is necessary this is place where Organizational framework comes into picture, certain techniques will be proven that assign tasks for various function and these decisions play a significant role in deciding organizational framework.

Based on the work done in business the organizations composition will vary and

Below will be the Factors deciding the organizations structure:

A) Size of the organization

B) Employees' responsibilities

C) Revenue

D) The geographic dispersion of facilities (variety of locations worldwide where the corporation has its services and facilities)

E) Selection of its business (the amount to which it is varied across markets)

Best organization framework will come up if all the above factors are taken into account. Responsibilities of employee are defined with what kind of work they certainly and who they are reporting to as well as for the manager's it would be based on the employee's who accounts to him/her and defining these responsibilities will be specific to the positions in the organization alternatively than to specific individuals. The associations among these positions are illustrated graphically within an organizational chart (see Statistics 1a and 1b).

Organizations can have multiple structural variants based on various factors but regardless of these versions there are few basics and small number of patterns which are normal for most of the organizations. Within the coming sections precise description of the habits found in organizational structure and historical framework from which some of them were surfaced is provided.

First section will give us a brief overview about the organizational framework in twentieth century. The next section provides additional information on traditional, vertically-arranged organizational buildings. This is accompanied by information of several different organizational buildings including those arranged by product, function, and physical or product markets. Next is a discussion of combination buildings, or matrix organizations. The talk concludes by addressing rising and potential future organizational structures.


Every Group will have its organizational framework if we understand the historical contexts that these organizational buildings have developed it helps to make clear why some set ups are the way they can be. For example, U. S. Metal and Bethlehem Metal which can be old but still operating are employing vertical hierarchies and Newer mills such as Chaparral Steel structured more horizontally (More capital on innovativeness of the employees, and there's a part of reason which we can understand why these organizations have modifications by having profound knowledge on historical contexts. The part of reason is Business structure will follow certain laws of physics and chemistry like inertia where if any thing is in action it tends to continue on that same avenue (Legislation of inertia) in the same way organization's composition changes will be very infrequent because immensity of the tasks and robustness in the managerial process would be partially responsible for the same.

In first stages of twentieth century there is a drift in US Business sector, industry is migrating from job-shop developing to mass creation and scholars like Frederick Taylor in america and Henri Fayol in France examined the new systems and there surfaced the new guidelines on how the organization structure would be to achieve ideal efficiency and output which is more like mechanical. Even before this German sociologist and engineer Maximum Weber came to conclusion that whenever societies embrace capitalism, bureaucracy is the inescapable result. Despite the fact that his writings were not translated into British until 1949, his work s has little impact on US Management practice until middle of 20th Century.

Management during 20th Hundred years is influenced by Bureaucratic ideas of Weber which says that more power will get to the position in the organizational framework not to the person holding the positioning. Taylor's medical management which emphasize on using scientifically-determined studies of your energy and action for accomplishing the duty and as per Taylor it is considered as one easiest way. Also Fayol's ideas of invoking unity within the chain-of-command, power, discipline, task expertise, and other areas of organizational electricity and job parting and from here came up the idea of vertical organised organizations main identity of this structure is top-down methodology and specific job classifications which is also called the original or classical organizational structure.

Traditional organizational composition:

Impact of traditional organizational framework on management practices

Every Group will have a distinctive organizational structure. However the ultimate goal for each organization is to accomplish the work following this structure. In procedure for organization development and changes happening in it the organizational composition will be emerged.

There are four basic decisions professionals have to make in procedure for developing an organizational structure. Below is the detailed description on the decisions which can be identified by researchers

Modularity: Work in the business must be split into modules. This would help to reduce the robustness of the task and effective deliverables

If the organization has few employees there is no need to dividing the folks into groups however in the situation where we have large organization we need to have small work teams which is popularly called as departmentalization

We should have predefined quantity of communities and employees (Which should have predefined structure like whom every staff is reporting to how many employees are under a particular manager.

Decision making electricity have to be distributed. There must be certain pool of employees who are doing narrow tasks and another pool of employees who are carrying out wide selection of tasks

Generally when a business is growing the duty will be more specialized so Administrator must become more specific in deciding the teams and assigning the tasks and there will be few requirements which we have to consider while forming the group's most typical thing which is taken into consideration is the function or site. Eg: Within an organization people who are specialized with bank account will be put under the accounts pool which will form the accounts team size of teams can also range predicated on certain requirements and the jobs and mostly in traditional organizational set ups decision making ability will be finally in hands of the best specialist but during 1950's and 1960's pressure was increased to entail employees also in decision making. A lot of the cases vertical hierarchy is given priority in traditional structure in case there is decision making.

Traditional model gets the following features

At every level more importance will to given to specialty area of the jobs

Departments could be more of practical specific

Controlling will be narrowed so as there exists modularity at each level

Centralization of the power

Thus we can send this structure as traditional, formal, device or command, classical, bureaucratic and control and framework where the above criteria aren't met decisions are created at complete opposite end of variety such constructions are unstructured, informal or organic

Traditional way of organizational structure can be symbolized as a pyramid with the bigger authorities like president at the very top level and the vice leader coming next and most of the employees at the bottom of the pyramid it is fairly simple to represent the traditional organizational structure and almost all of the instances the departments are made a decision predicated on the functionality. Amount 1a and 1b demonstrate such an corporation composition grouped by functional areas of procedure, marketing and fund.

Matrix Organizational Composition:

In some organizations their requirements would be different leading to scenario where we the organizational structure meet their necessity in such cases matrix organizational structure can be followed in this composition it can be combination of useful departments and the product groups consider an example where a company is trying for next release of its product and for the complete product development life routine experts are chosen from different departments like accounting, executive, creation and marketing and the personnel's chosen from these office will be doing work for the specific job and they're in charge of two professionals such as framework is referenced as matrix organizational structure (Fig 3 shows the matrix framework )


This composition is the highly professional personnel will be appointed to meet the requirements. In small range organizations there will be duplication of the staff in the same division rather than third, procedure we can seek the services of the experts and they can show their time working in multiple projects functional departments provides functional knowledge and dealing with specialist will let every individual to develop their knowledge and combination fertilization of ideas.


Main disadvantage of this kind of framework is reporting to multiple administrator like person need to report to both practical and product administrator. More impressive range management in the business have to be mindful in delegating the energy and predefine the tasks of the managers else there exists every likelihood for vitality conflicts

Apart from product/function matrix other bases can even be mapped in large organizations. Say along with product the geography can also be tangled up.

Product manager will be accountable for developing, developing and circulation of products and geography administrator will manage success of the business enterprise in their region. Development of business will be associated with growth of bureaucracy. Once the changes are occurring in an business bureaucracy may become hindrance somewhat than assisting it as the slow bureaucratic thought process To be able to get over this we can start having new ways of thinking we can make the SBU's (Small company units. Such device could be a split company and with full earnings and capital will be maintained by the head of the machine and he's responsible for the leader of the business. SBU's can be predicated on the geography, operation or products Shape 4 shows the SBU with geography area

More than 7 000 students trust us to do their work
90% of customers place more than 5 orders with us
Special price $5 /page
Check the price
for your assignment