PLAGIARISM FREE WRITING SERVICE
We accept
MONEY BACK GUARANTEE
100%
QUALITY

Mandatory Military Service: A good concept?

Is mandatory military services service a good thing for the united states?

Both World Wars, the Korean Warfare and the Vietnam Battle have one thing in commonmost who dished up were drafted through a mandatory system. Recently, high ranking Democratic Congressman, Charles Rangel, proposed reinstating the draft. Is mandatory military service a very important thing for the country? I am going to discuss the advantages and disadvantages of a military draft, as well as different kinds of compulsory military services service.

When people notice about a armed forces draft the first thing that involves brain is the Vietnam Warfare. The Vietnam draft system was flawed to say the least. Course played a significant role in the draft. It was quite easy for those with general understanding of the Selective Service system to avoid being drafted. Many believe some of the prosperous used their associations to get into the safer branches of the armed forces. President Bush's politics competitors have accused him of using his father's cable connections through the Vietnam War to find yourself in the relatively safe Texas Air National Shield.

College students could make an application for college student deferment, and at the time most university students were upper class. Scholar deferment would last until the learner done their studies and received a degree. If a draft was instituted today university students would only be deferred before end of their semester.

During the Vietnam Conflict, medical deferments were common. Physical problems were genuine reasons to be exempt from energetic duty service, however the lower course was at a downside because of fewer medical data. For example, previous presidential prospect Howard Dean was exempt from providing in the armed forces during the Vietnam War because of a back problem that he had medical records of from a dominant NY doctor. Some of the poor didn't hold the medical records to support their problems, and were required to provide.

According to draft supporters, a draft would unite the country. Today, most young people aren't actively engaged in their government. A draft would get everyone committed to our foreign insurance policy. Congressman Rangel feels instituting the draft would lead to fewer wars. It's one thing helping a pre-emptive strike on the country when others in the volunteer military will be doing the objective - but would you support it if you were on the front lines of this pre-emptive hit?

Another question that must be asked is-- Should those who don't want any area of the military be required to serve their country in the event of a draft? Our military's goal is to defend freedom inside our own country and in the world. So, a draft, in a few ways, sacrifices the very values were said to be defending. The Supreme Court docket has ruled that conscientious objection can be from religious or non-religious beliefs but can't be because of a particular warfare. Many objectors have offered in a weapons free branch of the military, or in a few form of community service.

According to the Selective Service System, they can evaluate and induct everyone drafted within 193 days and nights of a crisis. With such quick progress, is mandatory armed forces service now necessary? The job of the Selective Service is to provide manpower to the military. Therefore, the 193 days does not include the thorough training that is standard with the U. S. armed service. With such great technology at its removal, the U. S. military ensures its associates are knowledgeable about all its weapons systems.

There are numerous issues that must be attended to to avoid mass problems when a draft were placed today. Today, homosexuals are barred from offering in the armed forces. What would stop anybody who doesn't want to serve from claiming to be a homosexual? Also, would women be drafted? Today, only men have to register for the Selective Service.

If the situation in the centre East continues to worsen and propagate, our federal government may haven't any other choice but to put more boots on the ground. The only path to resolve troop shortages would be to re-instate the draft. We must hope our federal government would only send us in harms way when this country is truly in peril.

Bibliography

  • http://www. sss. gov - Selective Service System
  • http://www. cnn. com/2006/US/11/20/selective. service/index. html - CNN
  • http://www. cnn. com/2006/POLITICS/11/19/rangel. draft. ap/index. html - CNN
  • http://www. washingtonpost. com/wp-srv/politics/campaigns/wh1000/stories/bush072899. htm - Washington Post
  • http://www. ksg. harvard. edu/news/news/2003/hardball_dean_120103. htm - Harvard University
More than 7 000 students trust us to do their work
90% of customers place more than 5 orders with us
Special price $5 /page
PLACE AN ORDER
Check the price
for your assignment
FREE