We accept

Is the Family in Decline?

Keywords: is the nuclear family in decline

"Most people's idea of a normal household is a wedded couple with children. Does this much longer correspond with the reality of people's lives? In 2005 only 22 per cent of British homeowners consisted of several with dependant children, compared with 35 % in 1971. " (Fulcher J, Scott J, 2004 pg 446).

Over several generations, Britain and other Western societies have observed a transfer in family patterns and diverse jobs, also divorce rate have risen significantly and there has been a rise in 'Reconstituted family members' made from second marriages

The family is often thought to be the basis of world; in pre-modern and modern societies similarly is seen as the basis in which sociable organization takes place, for example socialising children, in the 1960's there is not debate about the value of family, at that family life was simply evolving with the present day times, the 'nuclear family' which contain a two era household of parent and their children, was seen as well adapted to the demands of society. A classic description of the family by George Peter Murdock (1949) "The family is a interpersonal group seen as a common residence, monetary co-operation and duplication. This includes people of both sexes, at least two of whom maintain a socially-approved sexual relationships, and a number of children, own or used, of the sexually cohabiting adults".

Another type of family is the prolonged family, which includes the family which expands 'vertically' that could include three generations for example; grandparent and grandchildren, it also stretches 'horizontally' to add at least 'in laws' cousins, aunts and uncles, and dependant on the perceptions and the restrictions of the family; can determine what lengths this stretches.

From an operating point of view the family purpose is to are a communal institute, and relating to (Haralambos & Holborn 2008) the family executes four basic functions in every societies which are termed the 'intimate', 'reproductive' 'economic' and 'educational' these are deemed essential for interpersonal life because without reproduction there would be no members of culture, also without economics there would no provisions for providing food and for that reason life would cease to exist, and without education as recommended by George Murdock there would be no culture and he advises therefore that real human society cannot function.

However relating to Parson (in Parsons & Bales 1956) the family sociable organization developed to meet two such needs that the family, in support of the family, found: the needs for most important socialization and personality stabilization Major socialisation was the procedure through which children have the basic values of culture from the family from an early age.

And adult personality is stabilized through the family to give psychological support through relationship, and create a chance for individuals to meet childish impulses that they cannot do in public, for example doing offers with their children.

Parsons suggested that the nuclear family was especially best suited the 'nuclear family' because the nuclear family jobs were specialized anticipated to one adult making profits through paid work, and the other adult bringing up the kids, therefore with there being one 'breadwinner' this was quite important factor in the commercial society due to high rates of change, this meant that this type of family were more 'geographically mobile' and they would also keep the world of work and family individual, as professional societies were worried about 'accomplishment 'and 'universalism'; this meant that folks were rewarded according to accomplishments and judged according to universal expectations of skills, and competence, the family however operated on a contrary basis; where the ideals of 'ascription' and 'particularism; thus, status was ascribed on who one was, for example, hubby of, partner of, parents would do their best to improve their children, therefore this overlapped in to the workforce this cause turmoil.

Marxist perspective expresses the capitalist system exploits the free domestic labour of the 'housewife' through home labour, and that child rearing should be considered as family activities 'outside' the procedure of the capitalist current economic climate but instead an important part than it.

This view is used because the 'man breadwinner' may then do longer hours, because the partner reaches home tending to children and the local work; children were seen as the process of reproduction of 'labour' by creating submissive employees.

Due to the male loaf of bread victor being put under pressure from the task destination to work much harder and faster, and quite often carrying out boring and repeated work in inadequate conditions, which they would have hardly any control therefore the family was viewed as an outlet for the strain and annoyance, and the bullied worker may regain their self-esteem by bullying their family. Although the wife play's a significant role in the capitalist economy, she would get no pay. Some housewives worked in paid work at a minimal wage, and acted as a 'reserve military' that could be attracted into work when there was a shortage of labour, and returned back when demand was low, which means nuclear family created an additional way to obtain 'cheap labour'.

Some sociologist dispute that the family has lost certain functions in modern industrial society, plus they suggest that corporations such as politics parties and university, and welfare organisations are doing functions of the family, Talcott Parson's argues that the family is becoming functionless on the 'macroscopic' levels. However not absolutely all sociologist trust this idea, plus they actually think the contrary, according to Ronald Fletcher, a British sociologist stated in 'The Family and Relationship in Britain' (1966)that the family has retained its functions but also those functions have 'increased in detail and importance' and specialised establishments such as colleges and hospitals have added to and upgraded the family functions, somewhat than suspended them, some example of these changes will be the expectations of the parenting role; they are anticipated to do their finest to guide, encourage and support their children through education and their.

Young and Wilmott (1973) claim that the 'symmetrical family is expanding where spouses are posting home, work and leisure activities; these types of romantic relationships are called 'joint conjugal' tasks instead of 'segregated tasks' which previously meant the marital tasks of couple were largely segregated. In the symmetrical family, conjugal assignments have grown to be more joined up with, the partner still has most important responsibility for housework and child rearing, however husbands have become more involved with domestic tasks like doing the cleaning and ironing, and share the decisions that have an impact on the family

The composition of the British family has shifted significantly over the last 50 years, a major influence of the is through the drop of relationship and the go up in cohabitation according to the 'Office of National statistics 2008'

Due to the changes in relationships, divorce and cohabitation to the growing amount of new types of individuals Two in five of all marriages are now remarriages, which makes step families one of the quickest growing family varieties in Britain, presently creating one, in the decade to 2006, the number of single parent households also risen to 2. 3 million, creating 14% of most family members in ten of most households. 18.

Ethnic variety is on the increase because of the increase of international migration is another way to obtain diversity, for example the structure of Afro-Caribbean and Asian people; considering the diversity in relation to origin and things to consider of how these have altered in the framework of British modern culture.

According to (Elliot 1966; Berthound 2000) the lower-class Afro-Caribbean family is centred on the role of the women, and marriages are weakly institutive and low because of the men 'wandering'; which means women commonly head the homeowners, and associations between moms and children are much more robust than those between fathers and children, and family life is commonly supported by other women apart from the biological mother. African-Caribbean women have been more financially effective than women from other ethnic groups, to see paid are a basis fro financial self-reliance and are more likely to control the utilization of their revenue than Asian or White women, however this is only permitted by the sharing of the mothering role with other women.

There are considerable social difference between south Asian nationalities that contain come to Britain, however there are similarities, for illustration people from rural areas in South Asia routinely have extended kinds of family, including three generations in one home and are structured by having a network of males, are bound alongside one another through religious beliefs in 'brotherhood' and family commitment. Marriages are set up and seen as a contrast of two family members.

According to young and Willmott the house centred symmetrical family is more typical of the working school than the middle class, they suggest that 'the working school' will be more fully home-centred because they're less totally work-centred'; and this is due to compensating for uninvolved and uninteresting work, and because little interest is expected at work, and manual workers tend to focus more attention on family life, therefore corresponding to Young and Wilmott see are a major effect on family

Migration to Britain greatly disrupted extended families of this kind and for most women this has kept them socially isolated at home and unsupported by the kin. Sikh household have grown to be more focused on lovers and women have renegotiated traditional patterns, through greater independence through paid work, however in compare Pakistani and Bangladeshi civilizations have been limited to homework or family business by Islamic prohibition of connection with unrelated men, this has lead to women being exploited as cheap labour and confined to the home.

Many sociologists are concerned about what they see as the decline in matrimony and family life, and they see this as a danger to the family, for example Brenda Almond (2006) thinks that the family is fragmenting, there is also a rise in the legal and social approval of marital malfunction, cohabitation, lgbt relationships etc.

Colin Gibson (1994) says through the development of modernity this has increased the likelihood of conflict between spouses anticipated to much emphasis after the desirability of specific achievement, Gibson feels that folks now live in an 'organization and free-market culture of individualism where the licence of preference dominates

The last 100 years have seen changes in legislation, technology, behaviour and targets that' have led to an enormous feminisation of the workforce since the second world conflict, also widespread contraception leading to deferred decisions about the beginning of individuals; and divorce, remarriage and cohabitation becoming much more acceptable. A leisure of societal attitudes towards relationship means it is no more seen as unconventional to be engaged in a 'complicated' family composition. Families are no more just made up of committed parents coping with their children. Although seven in ten households are still going up by maried people, this proportion has been declining for quite a while. Families are actually a variety of cohabiting parents, stepfamilies, solitary parent people, those living apart jointly and civil partnerships, as well as the original nuclear family.

More than 7 000 students trust us to do their work
90% of customers place more than 5 orders with us
Special price $5 /page
Check the price
for your assignment