Is Privacy In The 21st Century Possible? Essay

Privacy was once respected and protected. Nevertheless with so innovative and practical technological breakthroughs, is privacy in the 21st century possible? To protect the privacy Congress created the Electronics Privacy Functions (ECPA) to safeguard us from government use of private information that is certainly transmitted and stored for the Internet, just like emails, private photos, or perhaps corporate data. Congress have not updated the ECPA upon technology as it was created, in 1986.

When the ECPA was created there were no World Wide Web, social networking was something in the foreseeable future, and nothing was stored in what we call the cloud. With all the current technological changes in today's society no one is protected. Privacy is defined as getting free from the population eye. Yet we have a lot of people sharing private information on social networking websites, and gov departments monitoring e-mails, and messages or calls most of the time with no our understanding. There is no personal privacy in the 21st century, it is just a nostalgic feeling, and it is no longer practiced.

Today's privacy laws aren't up to date with today's technology. Things are rarely dispatched through the postal mail, and e-mail and text messages have substituted written connection. Online messages and social networking was a thing of a uniqueness when congress created the ECPA (Frolik, 2013). A recent article from the Dayton Daily news written by Cornelius Frolik upon June 2013 he mentioned, The Government can easily get many personal communications and also other private information with out sufficient potential cause. Rather than acquiring a warrant that needs more standards and techniques.

Government agencies rather obtain subpoena's to obtain people's emails, and telephone data (Frolik, 2013). Although, local authorities catch plenty of dangerous scammers through info online like emails, images, and networking communities like Facebook . com some critics still experience it is an attack of privateness. Also since our technology advances by leaps, and bounds so does the method Government uses new hi-tech tools to surveillance law-abiding citizens. Though our Last Amendment declares to protect the American people from irrational searches and seizures.

All the things is done through technology in the 21st century. This meaning that federal government can catch any e-mails that are 180 days or that has been opened without a justify; subpoenas have become the most used investigator instrument for Government agencies. The reason why is really because they can be quickly written inside prosecutors office without any even more review via a assess. This means there is certainly an exception for the Fourth Variation of the United States Cosmetic, if it fulfills the requirements.

The question we should be asking when it comes to Government and each of our privacy happen to be Should be to explain an obvious understanding of the phrase privacy? In the event the Government cannot clarify the word privacy after that how can they will protect the privacy? Having less clarity makes it hard intended for lawmakers to produce new guidelines that will maintain our privateness out of harm (Libin, 2012). Two reasons why privateness can be considered threaten in today's society a single being the us government powers are limitless, and two being we the American people expose ourselves digitally (Libin, 2012). The individuals of America should get together and declare for the federal government to protect each of our privacy instead of participate in warrantless searches (Libin, 2012).

The fact that the Govt can argue that the Fourth Change does not apply because there is the same to privacy when it comes to protecting national reliability, then that leave the American people in times of calamity, and crisis. Laws such as the ECPA is actually a law that the Government has an obligation to respect (Libin, 2012). The ECPA safeguard the privateness of the digital communications, nevertheless law enforcement and prosecutors have to protect and enforce laws, personal information should be collected to build a case (Libin, 2012). The perfect solution is more intricate than simply, and right now the Government is facing difficulties figuring out the best way to safeguard the American people (Libin, 2012).

Provided all the information privacy seems to be the problem. It can be described in many ways, one particular as it's protecting people from terrorism, and local offense; and two being for anyone who is innocent, what do you have to hide? In 2014 I find that most American people shop their digital lives in what we call The Cloud which included emails, calendar info, photos, and other sensitive data. The ECPA has become obsolete. Technology today leaves the ECPA out-of-date, the regulations have not transformed since it was originally created in 1986.

The present privacy laws only concentrate on the text-based personal records, and the issues that persons face today with this kind of outdated privateness law is definitely gathering of digital multi-media files, as well as the way this kind of unauthorized info is used (Lipton, 2010). Will you consider online video surveillance devices out on the road personal info? Some might say certainly and some may possibly say no . According into a case study explored by Jacqueline D. Lipton, if the encounter of an person is identifiable, than it can be considered personal data. Some individuals feel safeguarded with the video surveillance capturing their every moment.

Then simply on the other hand a lot of people feel they are really being scrutinized being watched by online video surveillance. The U. S i9000. has a safety for free presentation and for free from a press under the First Amendment. However there is no exhibit constitutional directly to privacy (Lipton, 2012). Problem that American people should rigorously take a look at is whether or perhaps not Congress should repeal the ECPA and makes new privacy laws to replace it (Kerr, 2014). The ECPA should be considered main priority when it comes to getting reformed.

If perhaps Congress would be to start clean on what changes to help to make on the ECPA the technologic changes would have to be specifically considered. Being that the cost of stored information has changed it also adjustments how regulation enforcements security people, that threatens personal privacy. In 1986 this all built sense because the internet was created at this time to hold limited storage, and wire-tapping was obviously a threat more than stored details (Kerr, 2014).

Overall use of stored record has become the finest privacy risk. Technology has changed enormously, info is stored. With anything being kept now about what we call up The Cloud like mentioned before stored info begins to reveal the same standard of details as real time security or real-time access (Kerr, 2014). Stored information is now more exposing an intrusive. (Kerr, 2014). References _Kerr, 0. T. (2014).

The newly released Communications Privacy Act. _ University of Pennsylvania Law Review_, _ 162_(2), 373-419. Retrieved from http://eds.b.ebscohost.com.proxy-library.ashford.edu/eds/command/detail?vid=26&sid=34a7b883-e7a4-45d2-aff3-a25b4e535c3e%40sessionmgr110&hid=107&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWRzLWxpdmU%3d#db=aph&AN=93917886_ _Libn, N. (2012). PRIVACY AND ACCOUNTABILITY NOWADAYS: Foreword. _ Harvard Rules and Insurance plan Review_, _ 6_, 263.

Retrieved by http://eds.b.ebscohost.com.proxy-library.ashford.edu/eds/detail/detail?vid=15&sid=34a7b883-e7a4-45d2-aff3-a25b4e535c3e%40sessionmgr110&hid=107&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWRzLWxpdmU%3d#db=edslex&AN=edslex2F0EC940_ _Lipton, J. D. (2010). Digitlal Multi-Media and The Limits of Privacy Regulation. _ Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law_, _ 42_(3), 551-571. Retrieved from http://eds.b.ebscohost.com.proxy-library.ashford.edu/eds/detail/detail?vid=24&sid=34a7b883-e7a4-45d2-aff3-a25b4e535c3e%40sessionmgr110&hid=107&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWRzLWxpdmU%3d#db=bsh&AN=51909959_ _Sutanto, J., Palme, At the., Chuan-Hoo, T., & Chee Wei, G. (2013).

Addressing The Personalization-Privacy Paradox: An Empirical Analysis From an area Experiment about Smartphone Users. _ LOS Quarterly_, _ 37_(4), 1141-A5. Retrieved by http://eds.b.ebscohost.com.proxy-library.ashford.edu/eds/detail/detail?vid=29&sid=34a7b883-e7a4-45d2-aff3-a25b4e535c3e%40sessionmgr110&hid=107&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWRzLWxpdmU%3d#db=bsh&AN=91906295_

  • More than 7,000 students prefer us to work on their projects
  • 90% of customers trust us with more than 5 assignments
Special
price
$5
/page
submit a project
Check the price
for your project
we accept
Money back
guarantee
100% quality
Plagiarism free writing service