Posted at 11.20.2018
Humanism, specifically through the Renaissance, was an enormous movement for the human mind all together and how personality in appearance of thoughts and ideas was celebrated. Custom had not been something to be blindly used any more. One might dispute that humanism performed the biggest role in creating the Renaissance. This is as a result of huge focus on learning Roman and Greek texts, which gave a fresh outlook on their modern world focused on the human capacity. Painting was influenced by humanism by becoming more realistic while also keeping varieties classic. In addition, it heavily centered on the real human experience. Both paintings I found showing this well were "THE INSTITUTION of Athens" by Raphael and "The Tribute Money" by Masaccio. In "The School of Athens" it is clear education is the main theme, which makes sense because humanism throughout that period had too much to do with educating and thinking for yourself. "The Tribute Money" portrays a biblical landscape in which Jesus functions a miracle to fulfill the tax repayment. It has multiple things taking place from the story at exactly the same time and individuals are all doing different things. They are both great types of focusing the interest towards everyday routine. You can also see that, in every person depicted, they have a brain of their own. They look in various directions and are undertaking different actions, you can find no one true center target. Secularism and naturalism can be seen throughout Renaissance fine art as well. You can find less concentrate on church scenes and more focus towards the outside and creating an environment of the earth. They targeted for exactness in the paintings as well, which may be seen especially well in "The Tribute Money". If you look towards your feet there are cast shadows and the lamps is used to make a much more realistic scene possessed there not been shadows. What can be seen is the motion of the people depicted, except for Jesus, which models the field as more of a photography in time instead of a correctly posed picture that was recreated.
The Baroque period was started round the 1600s. It really is thought to be that the main pieces of background relating to the Baroque period were the reformation and the Counter-top Reformation. The Catholic Chapel announced at the Council of Trent that artwork was to depict religious ideas and themes. It focused on the most remarkable point in the storyline, in comparison to Renaissance art which concentrated more on a everyday portrayal of the scene. Baroque artwork is very dramatic and uses light to dramatize the field even more. The strategy used, in reference to the equipment and lighting and darks, is named chiaroscuro. It used tough lights and candlight scenes to help make the painting even more dramatic. The colour use was also very remarkable, although they could not be dazzling the emotional charm behind colors was used to help stimulate and evoke sentiment in the audience. The common designs behind Baroque skill were visions, ecstasies, fatality, and overall intense moments. One big difference however you like between Baroque and Renaissance art work is usually that the planes and depth in Baroque is a lot more limited than in Renaissance which acquired clearly described planes and things or people in the planes. Renaissance's use of perspective offered them realism, which didn't permit the feeling that was aiming to be depicted. It fell a bit chiseled, but Baroque arrived and "solved" this matter by their use of style and lamps to bring back the emotion that was lost in the Renaissance period. Two works of art from the Baroque period that show off this are "The Ecstasy of St. Teresa" by Giovanni Bernini and "The Conversion on the path to Damascus" by Caravaggio. "The Ecstasy of St. Teresa" organised a very common theme in Baroque artwork, a gathering of the divine and human being. The sculpture is of as soon as St. Teresa recalled an angel coming down and piercing her with an arrow of love. The way light is utilized on the sculpture is Baroque in every sense, from the light coming down from a yellow tinted home window above and real wood rods slipping from behind being lit the same. "The Change on the path to Damascus" is a great example of how Caravaggio used light and dark to create drama and sentiment. It is a candlight scene with tough light via out of view, light one area of the horse and Paul, while the man in the back is slipping away into the darkness.
John Donne was known for his different style in writing. He had abstract verses, unusual lengths, and frequently puzzling metaphors. Although he proceeded to go against the grain of writing at that time, he was presented with a better appreciation in later times. His unique style stemmed from religious beliefs and lust. He indicated both in a way those had not done before him, and it worked. I read that he was an Anglican minister, which offered his many contradictions live. His life was somewhat of the contradiction seeing as he composed about the physical nature of life and loss of life while also weaving spirituality into his poems. Thomas Wyatt, on the other hand, took much of his ideas from Petrarch, although he did write poems of his own. They were more consistent however you like. All of the sonnets we read by Wyatt were octaves accompanied by a sestet, and he previously consistency in almost all of his writing. That is unlike Donne who was simply sporadic and had little ongoing style. One thing they had in common was their impact on the poetry of their times, both could be called innovators. The poems of Donne were also livelier in the sense that they had more sentiment. They both experienced poems interacting with thoughts that may run through your mind at certain times in your life, which I enjoyed. Wyatt's poems were more pleasing to me, aesthetically, because I could enjoy poems more when they have a steady theme and style. His writing is very similar, and I was able to get more into it when I could understand the rhyme scheme. His theme behind his sonnets that we read was interacting with love and a loss of love. I was able to understand these even more as well because, as most everyone, has enjoyed and reduction that love at some point in their life. Not specifically an enchanting marriage but any romantic relationship gives you to feel those feelings and they're powerful, which made me enjoy them more.
Aesthetics, if you ask me, is almost indescribable. It really is all around us, beautiful and appreciative. Why is it interesting is everyone views and appreciates the visible and literary arts in their own subjective way. It introduces questions that are hard to answer. What is beauty? These questions are what made aestheticism a movements to start with. To look for something cosmetic is to truly have a sense of beauty and feeling, the art itself provokes feelings within. To me, an artwork that shines as cosmetic are sculptures, specifically marble. "David" by Michelangelo is exactly what stands out if you ask me the most. When I noticed the David personally, I had not been stuck pondering the theory or relaxing there thinking strictly intellectually about the statue, but instead experienced this emotion fill me that almost made my jaw drop. The sheer size only acquired me breath used and in awe. I think why is something aesthetically important if you ask me is the knowledge of the time and craftsmanship it took to create it. The David is 17 feet tall and clean marble. Michelangelo took more than two years to build it as well. Everything that I learned after, which managed to get even more appealing, but even in that moment I realized there is something beautiful and great about the part. It is hard to describe why I liked it so much at the time, but I think that is why a few of the beauty in artwork is so amazing, an indescribable understanding and affection for the piece. It's rather a different part or everyone, which I'm sure will be seen by the responses to this question. Appearance of skill is beautiful as a result of subjectivity it innately has within. Whatever you are to find beautiful is justified, even if nobody else does indeed.