We accept

History of the North american Constitution

  • Michael Dean
  • Jalal Nejad, Ph. D.

When america won independence from THE UK after the North american Revolution they implemented the Articles of Confederation. Twenty-one years america was ruled by the Articles until they followed the U. S. Constitution in 1787. This managed to get so the nation was guidelines by the sovereign national authorities, but also the state governments were sovereign as well. Some advantages that this system has over a strong national authorities in an extremely centralized system is it encourages competition between your says, as well as it offers sovereignty to the claims to run themselves the way they best see fit. Some disadvantages of the current system in the United States are that scheduled to federal financing of state costs if the role of nationwide authorities was more limited it could have a drastic economic effect on their state. Also because of the aggressive nature of many federal government programs the state governments cannot effectively run these programs themselves and depend on national support.

During the Articles of Confederation the countrywide government was amazingly weak in ability, this insufficient national power left the country not running as a whole unit but instead the says as individual organisms. After twenty-one years america rewrote their laws and regulations, and called it the U. S. Constitution. Under this group of laws the national government was sovereign but nonetheless getting its electric power from the people, and the areas were sovereign as well and acquired their vitality from the people. Under the U. S. Constitution a variety of types of federalism came and went, innovating to where the country is today, which is a marble-cake system of federalism. Marble-cake federalism is the cooperation between different degrees of government, whether countrywide, talk about, or local (Champagne Harpham 43).

An advantage this technique of federal government has over a solid national government in a highly centralized system is so it inspires competition amidst the areas. Every point out has insurance plan issues but most areas make an effort to fix that problem their own way. If circumstances is successful in correcting the problem, then the coverage would adjusted nationally to reproduce what the talk about did in order to fix the issue. Another benefit of this system is that it gives claims freedom to govern the way they best see fit. This should go from gun control laws and regulations, traffic violations, and even the fatality penalty.

Disadvantages to the current system in place would be that credited to money from the national government to areas budgets if it were to be take off or diminished, it would have a very profound effect on the overall economy of their state. This means that too much reliance on nationwide government as it pertains to money is a terrible thing because some state governments rely very closely on the federal government to help them balance their budget. Another disadvantage will be the reliance on federal support for different programs throughout the state governments, without their support several programs would suffer greatly or even fail completely. Because of this crutch that the states have they can not fully be sovereign.

To conclude, this country has truly gone through many types of federalism from complete separation of ability between the several levels of government to where in fact the country is currently which is call marble-cake federalism. You will find both benefits and drawbacks that this system has over a strong national federal in a highly centralized system. Some advantages would be so it invokes creativity and competition throughout the states (Champagne Harpham 44), as well as providing the states flexibility to govern how they see fit. Some disadvantages would be that the state governments rely too greatly on federal government for funding, as well as leaning too much on the nationwide government when it comes to applying and keeping different programs.

Works Cited

  1. Champagne, Anthony, and Edward J. Harpham. Regulating Texas:. New York: W. W. Norton & Company, 2013. Print.
More than 7 000 students trust us to do their work
90% of customers place more than 5 orders with us
Special price $5 /page
Check the price
for your assignment