Posted at 01.01.2019
The evil within one person, in ways, is like a viral disease. It can be within one and after some time infect another, and it maintains doing this regularly until the last evil person dies without transferring to another one who cannot avoid the evil. A great example comes from movies, it's the hero's job to get rid of evil, and there has been a movie or play where in fact the hero destroys bad and then become bad himself.
In Hamlet, from William Shakespeare, Prince Hamlet takes on the main character and as well the hero of the story. Hamlet decides to get rid of the relationship of Claudius, the new king/evil person, who wiped out the old king, became the new ruler himself, and committed Gertrude the mom of Prince Hamlet. The visitors can see Hamlet's action changing through the play from good to bad. In the beginning, he is a good prince and a well respected son, and then his father's ghost, who in my own thoughts can be an evil ghost, instructs him that his uncle murdered him. Hamlet then becomes furious and starts to setup a plan to murder Claudius in cool blood.
Ophelia, the lady that Hamlet is supposed to love, is treated just like some other woman in passing; she actually is not cured in a adoring manor. Hamlet even runs so far as to share with her, "You ought not have presumed me, for virtue cannot so inoculate our old stock but we shall relish than it. I cherished you not" (Hamlet, 116-118). I believe Hamlet is not speaking from his heart but from the madness he was committed to act out. The way he acted at her funeral proves that he do actually love her, he advised everyone, "I enjoyed Ophelia; Forty thousand brothers cannot with all their levels of love constitute my amount; what wilt thou do on her behalf. " (Hamlet, 270). Hamlet also converts from a standard person into an wicked man; this even impacts his physical maintenance as he strolls around dirty with his clothes disheveled. Another example is the fact that towards the end of the story Hamlet actually gropes his mother, Gertrude, and practically makes out with her. Disgusting whenever we think about it, but that is why is it wicked, there are no limitations; it shades the victim handling their thoughts and activities.
The possession of bad can also bring out the thoughtless, mad, and foolish monster in a man and spoil his reputation and life. Prince Hamlet lacks control of his anger even in front of his close friends, as well as Horatio, his closest friend of most. (http://www. bookrags. com/essay-2004/2/29/19508/6860) His friends can plainly see that he is losing his brain. It looks as if; even the poor gravedigger from town recognizes that Hamlet has truly gone mad. Once Hamlet confronts him, the gravedigger doesn't acknowledge Hamlet, and he says,
"Hamlet is mad and sent to Britain. . . why, because 'a was mad. A shall retrieve his wits there, or if 'a do not, 'tis no great matter there. . . Twill not be seen in him there. There the men are as mad as he. " (Hamlet, 150-155) The clown, or gravedigger, was discussing the mental state of Hamlet with Hamlet right in front of him. This goes to show that Hamlet gone from a well known royal man to this issue of each day work discussion. (http://www. bookrags. com/essay-2004/2/29/19508/6860)
Prince Hamlet became an awful evil man, plus some readers could even feel that he gone truly crazy, although some believe he didn't. Hamlet didn't just wipe out one man with the purpose of justifying his father's murder. He murdered Laertes, he killed Polonius convinced that Polonius was Claudius, and finally he stabbed Claudius and poured the poisonous drink down his throat, like it was only water, and since Claudius was dying he informed him, "Here, thou incestuous, murderous, damned Dane, drink off this potion. Is thy union here? Follow my mother. " (Hamlet, 325-327) At this moment evil was throughout, transferring from person to some other. The scene's firmness shows such fury and anger with the purpose of evil. Even if Claudius deserved to perish, Hamlet cared for him as a pointless animal. Hamlet acquired murdered his uncle without the compassion.
Hamlet didn't eliminate Claudius simply for his own satisfaction; he did it at the will of his father the ghost. It could may actually so since Hamlet meticulously organized his vengeance to wipe out Claudius slowly in order to watch him die painfully. That presents that Hamlet just snapped and travelled crazy. His total sense of ethics and the poise of your prince were gone, vanished, exchanged to wicked thoughts of murder and revenge.
Hamlet illustrates how depth and potential in thinking is not healthy for several situations that he faces, which eventually causes his downfall. As humans we've the ability to use considered to attain good, or we can twist our thoughts and utilize them just for the purposes of evil. Pondering too much is a deeper aspect of the mind that can cause just as much good as evil. The bad aspect to this functionality is that individuals end up pondering too much in regards to a decision and never wrap up actually doing anything. The more people think, the less they are doing. Because of this, considering too much leads visitors to doubt, wrong doings, and wrong decisions, sometimes even the increased loss of control.
One perfect exemplory case of too much critical thinking is when Hamlet gets the perfect chance to kill his uncle, the ruler, and revenge his father's fatality. He almost goes through with it, but begins to actually consider what he's doing. To close the landscape, Hamlet makes a decision that if he murders his uncle as the ruler is praying for forgiveness, he will automatically send Claudius to heaven and there would be no true revenge for the reason that. Hamlet says, "'Tis heavy with him: and am I then revenged, for taking him in the purging of his soul, when he is fit and season'd for his passage? No!" (Hamlet, 84-87)
Prince Hamlet is well known, at the beginning of the play, to utilize his brains before he will something, but his actions seemed to change his future. He blames himself and his madness for his activities. Hamlet has lost his head. A lot of the things aren't heading his way, making all his decisions, in particular the revenge for his father's murder very difficult. "He that hath made us with large discourse and the incapability of earning godlike reason, made us only contain one part knowledge and three parts coward. " (Hamlet 36-43) He wonders why he's still alive to speak. "Witness this army of such mass and fee, led with a delicate and sensitive prince, whose soul, with divine ambition puff'd. " (Hamlet, 47-49)
Hamlet emphasizes how a good and real spirit becomes destroyed by ambition turning him to bad, the aspiration to become renowned and accepted. "My thoughts be bloody or be nothing at all worth. " (Hamlet, 66) Hamlet has unveiled his own turmoil. He was fundamentally a good person who let his desire for revenge towards Claudius get the better of him. Hamlet's identity is shown to be one of virtue at the start of the play. He's soon sucked in to the world of wicked and dishonesty since he cannot get the idea of Claudius murdering his dad out of his head. His mother marrying Claudius contributes salt to the wound and he cannot forgive her for what she's done either.
This is where in fact the change in Hamlet really occurs he says "my thoughts be bloody or be little or nothing well worth. " (Hamlet, 66) By stating this he is allowing revenge to create in and dominate, resulting in his own fatality. Some say a man must become bad and evil to be able to deter bad. Hamlet's way is definitely not the way to solve a challenge; it serves as a domino result and creates more violence. As with the majority of things in the end, goodness always prevails.