We accept

Gender Stereotypes in Young Children

Sweets and Spice and everything nice, that's what little girls are made of. " World today has made a cut line in what is appropriate for a little boy and what is appropriate for just a little girl. Society has made that difference through gender stereotyping. If you walk into a preschool classroom today, little girls will be playing dress-up with fairy and princess outfits while the males will be tackling one another or using dump trucks. Despite the fact that many people think that gender is not learned, but instinctual instead, there may be outside influences on gender functions that children fall victim to, for example parents impact gender assignments by the terminology they use and press and toys reinforce gender stereotypes in children by figure portrayal and advertisements.

There are many different parenting styles that are seen today. Psychologist Diana Baumrind learned four basic styles of parenting; authoritarian, permissive-indifferent, permissive-indulgent, and authoritative (Morris, 310). Whatever the parenting style that a person family opts for, there seems to be a common thread; nearly all parents will dress little guys in blue and girls in pink. The thought process behind this is so that their gender can be identified properly by an outside source. No father or mother would like to be walking by having a store with the little boy and have a stranger ask, "How old is she?" Interestingly enough however, in line with the article "What's Wrong with Cinderella?" publisher Peggy Orenstein points out "when colors were first launched to the nursery in the first part of the twentieth century, green was considered the more masculine hue, a pastel version of red. Blue, with its intimations of the Virgin Mary, constancy and faithfulness, was thought to be dainty. " Someplace along the collection, the change was thought true; green was more feminine and blue was more masculine, and it is so "enforced" by today's specifications.

Another exemplory case of how strongly parents influence gender was learned when an experiment was performed at Harvard School. Male newborns were dressed up in pink outfits and were then given to adults to take care of under the impression that they were girls. The terms used in combination with the boy babies dressed in red fell in to the female stereotype, while the girl babies dressed up in blue fell into the male stereotype, being called handsome and difficult (Pruett). Terminology is a major influence on gender interpretation. Often we tell boys never to cry and describe things with different shades for kids versus young girls. If a little girl hits a friend, parents/caregivers might use a gentler phrase like, "gentle practical friends and family please. " If a little boy hits a pal, parents/caregivers could shrug the action off as "Boys will be children" as the common saying runs or raise their voices to get the point across more strongly, "We USUALLY DO NOT struck our friends!"

Even the compliments that people bestow after children can be gender stereotyping. When you tell just a little a woman how fairly she looks in her dress is an illustration of this. Parents business lead by example. Their children learn patterns from what they see their parents doing, even if unintentional. If a child sees their mother as the one who always does indeed the laundry and cooks the foodstuffs and the daddy as the one who always calls for the trash away, then chances are that the child will follow the same tasks when as they grow up.

Media also performs a big part in where children find out about what their gender role is. Disney videos are a perfect example of this. In these videos, the leading feminine figure, usually a princess, is nice, affectionate, daydreams about Prince Charming, and almost always wears a clothe themselves in a pastel color. On the other hand, the same Disney movie can symbolize the male human population seeing with a prince, who is usually strong, inclined to deal with, and always gets the lady by the end. These characters often lead to a misunderstanding of what's feminine and what's masculine. Over the spectrum of gender identification, Disney may signify the extremes of what the correct gender role is.

Advertisements tend to be seen using gender as a marketing strategy for gadgets or games. If you look at a commercial for Tonka Pickup trucks, there will not be a little young lady to be seen in these ads. However, if you see a commercial for Easy-Bake oven, the contrary will be true. There will be no children in those advertisements. Finding these on tv demonstrates to children what should be an appropriate toy for just a little son and what should be appropriate for a little girl. Even the behaviours of children portrayed in television advertisements are stereotypic. Young boys are often seen as dynamic and domineering while the women are portrayed as shy or overly silly.

These advertising usually lead to the purchase of the toys and games shown for the gender it was geared to. Parents often ask yourself if you provide a baby doll to just a little young man or a dump vehicle to just a little gal, will they be gender baffled. Even the most new-age parents might find it bizarre to see their little young boys travelling preschool with a bag and in dress shoes. Boys have a harder time crossing the gender range, whereas some parents of females might think that it's alright for his or her daughters that can be played with dump vehicles or Legos. This does not imply that the son could be more womanly and the girl will be a tom-boy, but a majority of parents do not want to associated risk that.

Not everyone feels, however, that gender is totally a learned tendencies. In '09 2009, Texas A&M University used eye tracking software to measure infant's interest in either "male" or "female" gadgets (Shaffer). Matching to an article published in 2010 2010, the author M. Fox, found the results to be extremely useful:

Hormone levels in the saliva, as well as finger dimensions that reveal prenatal testosterone visibility were measured to see if these things could describe why the newborns visually preferred certain playthings over others. The results unveiled that while the girls' tastes weren't influenced by hormone levels by any means, the boys' tastes were affected by both current and prenatal hormone levels. It would appear that the higher the presence of testosterone at the time of the test, the higher the desire for groups of figures over specific figures, and the ones who indicated a higher exposure to prenatal testosterone got a stronger choice for the ball on the doll.

This means that the guys exhibited an optical penchant for gender specific playthings. In an article in New Scientist, Linda Geddes expresses that research has been done to show that the introduction of changing levels of testosterone and estrogen while babies are in utero may also involve some sway where toys children pick.

There are other theorists that believe there is a cognitive connection to gender development. Carol Lynn Martin and Diane Ruble are two such theorists. They discuss Kohlberg's theory of gender development is and the actual impact is of knowing your gender does not change. This is an important reality for children to learn, generally setting up the principles of what's 'accurate' action for your gender type. Martin and Ruble think that there are essential cognitive topics for gender development, rather than the influence of a particular exterior source.

The first important theme discussed is "The Introduction of Gender Personal information and Its Outcomes. " Within this level, it is allegedly general knowledge that children recognize that there are two different types of genders, plus they have the realization that they get into one particular two categorizing sexes. This first theme is then divided into two sub-categories, "Evaluative Repercussions" and "Motivational and Informational Repercussions. " The previous meaning that the child understands and identifies one group as their own and recognizes this group as an optimistic. The latter sub-category means that you the kid picks a gender to recognize with even though the want to comprehend the opposite intimacy dwindles, the individual seems only interested it their own gender individuality.

The second theme that is regarded as a cognitive gender personality link is "Active, Self-Initiated View of Gender Development" and the final theme is "Developmental Patterns. " In these two themes, the thought is that the main focus is learning about the communal gender group that they most identify with, and developing and growing the characteristics that are most acquainted with the identified gender. While checking out the cognitive connection to gender, many place a solid connection to motivational significances and developmental configurations of the gender personality theory.

Even though many theorists assume that gender is not really a learned behavior, nevertheless, you are given birth to knowing the difference between 'appropriate' guy behaviors and toys and games and 'appropriate' female behaviors and gadgets, others disagree. Those individuals state that there are many possible outside influences on children when they are learning their gender roles in contemporary society. Some also assume that being aware of specific gender stereotypes has a connection to how one behaves. The mass media and gadgets that children do see and use play an elaborate part in the idea of gender jobs and parents effect gender id by using specific dialect and actions. If gender is id is entirely obtained by effect or is pre-determined by some cognitive interconnection, it is an intriguing concern. Should children be able to make the choice of the toy that they would like to play with or what a common color is likely to be regardless of what society claims is "normal"? With the role that parents or caregivers play in gender role id, they ought to learn different options for breaking stereotypes. People could make sure they use the same language for both sexes or become involved in activities such as cuddling with boys or wrestling with women. Attaching children of both sexes in such a manner is a good way to encourage the cycles of gender stereotyping to get rid of.

More than 7 000 students trust us to do their work
90% of customers place more than 5 orders with us
Special price $5 /page
Check the price
for your assignment