Ezekiel 40-48 Launch The prophesy of the temple needs to be interpreted practically and not figuratively. This is because it absolutely was given each time when Ezekiel was still in captivity. Seeing that Ezekiel was in captivity although stating this kind of prophecy, this time around was textual and not radical. Similarly, Ezekiel's apocalyptic prophecies tend to have close similarities with prophecies found in the revelations, which is one other suggestion the fact that prophecy is somewhat more literal than figurative.
In Ezekiel 40-42, Ezekiel details a serenidad that is being constructed and would be used for worshiping because of not only the Israelites but likewise the entire world. Since the temple being described has never been constructed, it is evident the fact that prophecy is definitely yet to be fulfilled. In early chapters of Ezekiel 40, the prophet speaks of being taken up Jerusalem within a vision. It is in this eyesight that he could be shown a new temple.
The key reason why the prediction is more textual than figurative is because the majority of prophecies are liberal. For instance, the same way Our god showed Ezekiel a real brow, a similar serenidad was proven to David, which was later on being built by simply Solomon in Jerusalem when he was california king. Hence, for me, the forehead that The almighty showed Ezekiel will also be built in Jerusalem.
The different reason why Ezekiel's prophecy was more exacto than radical is due to the details covered in the chapters. Measurements of the temple walls and courtyards and gateways make the vision seem more exacto. Although this vision is usually yet to become fulfilled, the book of facts states that there will be no temple created in the New Jerusalem mainly because it is Goodness and the lamb that will signify the temple.
Due to this thought, it is apparent that the prediction is literal since not any temple will probably be constructed. In Ezekiel 44-46, Ezekiel talks of sacrifices that is to be offered in the modern temple. This prophecy is usually literal mainly because it is hard to believe that eschew will come in existence again in the future. I think, this prophecy is exacto since rather than sacrifices, the vision describes memorial sacrifices similar to the ones that occurred throughout the first coming of Jesus Christ such as the previous supper. During the last supper, Jesus asked his disciples to use bread and wine in his commemoration.
This implied that God likes this form of commemoration as opposed to the regular sacrifice. For me, the sacrifice visualized inside the temple by Ezekiel is far more literal than symbolic since it represents the existence of Jesus rather than the literal pet sacrifice. Through this, it really is evident that the temple visualized by Ezekiel will be achieved by Jesus' second arriving. In Ezekiel 45-46, he talks of the prince that will carry out his roles with justice and righteousness. As an example, when it comes to tax, this royal prince will ensure that he takes only what one can find the money for, this is with regards to one's economical ability.
Just for this revelation, it might be evident the fact that prophecy ought to be understood because literal but not figurative. Sources La Hermana, William Sanford, David Allan Hubbard, Frederic William Rose bush, and Leslie C. Allen. Old Testament Survey: The Message, Contact form and Backdrop of the Older Testament. Grand Rapids, Mich: W. M. Eerdmans, 1996. Price, Randall.
Ezekiel's Prophecy of the Temple. Regarding the Bible. n. m. Available at http://www.worldofthebible.com/Bible%20Studies/Ezekiel%27s%20Prophecy%20of%20the%20Temple.pdf Reflections around the First Legs. 2009.
Available at http://garyeyates.blogspot.com/2009/12/temple-in-new-testament html.