Posted at 12.11.2018
The theory of Utilitarianism fits nicely with the aim of film censorship, as the theory is often referred to by the key phrase "the best good for the greatest number of people" this being the primary aim of all censorship organizations worldwide.
Since the early days and nights of film, when the Cinematograph Take action was first established in the U. K and the Hays code of film classification in the U. S, the issue of censorship in the world of film has grown and expanded. In Britain especially, because of the strict nature of The British Plank of Film (BBFC), renowned for it's almost prudish laws and it's promise since 1913, that no film shall complete if not clean and wholesome (All seeming just a little Gandalph the Gray). A remarkable statement given that through the second world battle the BBFC laid back their censorship laws to allow the airing of Anti-Nazi films such as 'Pastor Hall' and 'Love on the Dole' both of which wouldn't normally of been handed previously, also when you take into account some of the graphic nature of films we watch today, compared to the standard of popularity in the early days of movie theater, we can see a much more laid back approach to censorship. As a whole the, the burkha of videos organizations have managed to protect the public and family pets interest for many years, even if a lot of people think its not necessarily required or necessary sometimes, these main key censorship issues cover:
1. Sexual Violence
2. Emphasis on the procedure of violence and sadism
3. unwell treatment of animals
4. Details of criminal technique
5. Blasphemous images or dialogue.
6. Glamorisation of weapons that are both specifically dangerous rather than already well-know in Britain.
All which cause a great difference of judgment in its own individual way.
From a feminist viewpoint the extent of censorship in film can never be too high, particularly when it involves the erotic images depicted in a few videos. The anti-porn argument is the fact that pornography differs from other censorship requirements, stating that it has special frustrating powers that urges its audiences to replicate what they see on the display. This maybe an interesting and appropriate observation anticipated to human natures natural instinct to reproduce that is hard wired into our DNA. These urges to replicate what we see on the screen however could change from individual to individual depending the individuals personal desire, say for example a person with a passion for martial arts and fighting with each other could react with the same special powerful urges gained from observing an action crammed film, as being a film with powerful music can alter the viewers disposition depending on the type of music enjoyed.
Terrorism in recent generations holds an integral place in the minds of most those accountable for creating another big film, because any act of terrorism that occurs in real life like the world trade centre tragedy, must be carefully censored. This type of censorship is not indefinite though as eventually motion pictures depicting the terrorist become its main issue will still make it to the silver screen sooner or later.
To talk about but a few motion pictures specifically that highlight such an incident would be the videos 'United 93' or 'World Trade Centre' both which were released five years following the terrorist assault on the Twin Towers of the World trade centres in NY, Although a documentary film (Fahrenheit 911)predicated on this event premiered just 3 years after the horrific problems.
A newer exemplory case of the continuing argument of censorship can take us to the China Film Group, who in line with the (Guardian) attempted to order that the blockbuster film The Avatar be suspended from Chinese cinemas due to the films central characters (the Na'vi) resembling that of the vulnerable in china having out their homes by predatory property designers. This obviously did not come to fruition as the film smashed the Chinese language container office record, which just shows us that the censorship advised, was not a case of utilitarianism as the censor could have only been good for a relatively small number of people, instead of the thousands who obviously loved the looking at pleasure. The variety as to what sort of film is perceived has two ends, at one we've the people who deem motion pictures and multimedia as a hypnotic medication because of its passive visitors, at the other end are people that have an anti-censorship perspective, that we as individuals can decipher for ourselves what text messages are works of fiction or artwork, the results of an individuals actions after looking at a film is that individuals internal problem.
The Harry potter group of books and movies by J. K. Rowling have sparked many debates on the censorship laws, some educational numbers from schools objected to the videos being released credited to it's mention of the occult, that could lead the young audiences to develop an unhealthy involvement in the subject of occultism, even though Harry potter series caused less problems in colleges when released in 1997 in reserve format. Which illustrates how peoples views on censorship can change considerably if it dos not meet their own requirements.
Today it is unthinkable to express such animal cruelty of which Michael Cimino indicated while making the film Heavenly gate, from allegedly blowing up a horses with dynamite to eradicating chickens and wounding horses merely to use their bloodstream on his celebrities. However cruelty to family pets in film in a few countries today still move censorship rulings, Within the south Korean film The Isle some amphibious creatures were mutilated, even more grotesquely in the Italian film Cannibal Holocaust they used and wiped out turtles and Monkeys in that horrific manner it might be distasteful to do it again. Animal rights neighborhoods online is a forum setup with the sole purpose of warning those delicate to the abuse of pets, of any movies they have seen that contain the use of canine cruelty.
One of the very most controversial films viewed by some of containing Blasphemous Dialogue and Imagery is that of The Exorcist, although all the hype surrounding the film's curse on creation made it essential see film ( with a don't look at that highway side accident situation), The Exorcist dominated the advertising throughout the world, notably for it's spiritual battle of good and bad or God v Satan. Censors across the world needed a bold jump of faith in not tampering with film, some differing in the overall ranking, deciding the level necessary for it's audience ranged from the MPAA's Uncut R which allowed minors combined with a grown-up, to the UK's X rating which allowed over 18's only and for quite some time the BBFC avoided the release of the film on Video tutorial.
With the arrival of the internet, Censorship organizations such as that in the USA and the United Kingdom, offer an almost futile task of keeping all videos that they ban from airing in cinemas and Dvd and blu-ray from being looked at, for example a film entitled 'The Profit' was forbidden by the majority of film censorship organizations in 2001, preventing further syndication of the film completely, because of the Chapel of Scientology taking out an injunction up against the film with the courts finding the film to be a parody of Scientology. However in 2008 the film was distributed on the peer to peer document sharing website as well as the ever popular You-tube.
It is often thought that the cool characters portrayed in glamorous films, carrying glistening weapons, has a very glorifying effect on its audience young and old. The film censors run a very thin collection with this subject matter as many appropriately rate a film based on it's visual assault but they also have to look at the psychological effect of glamorization, to some extent this could simply be considered a beautiful women holding a beautiful weapon, but not automatically using that weapon in a violent manner.
More importantly when a censor feels that the film has content that may give its viewers a new approach of method of successful unlawful activity, it must make a decision if the approach itself would have a serious effect out in the real world that may lead to a rise in the particular offence.
The level of censorship required varies from person to person with such a severe difference, that what some find acceptable and normal, others find obscene and unpleasant. Therefore the censorship is determined by these organizations that all together, decide what's satisfactory to certain age levels.
The most important thing we should keep in mind when deciding if the censorship of a certain film we have watched or will watch is appropriate or necessary, is if it was integrated for the greater good for the greatest number of people. In my thoughts and opinions the largest most the many movies I have got the pleasure of viewing have had enough censorship recognition, which tells me that the videos that are banned, are done so for a good reason.