Posted at 11.24.2018
In our true to life, we always discuss truth. We look for the real so this means of truth atlanta divorce attorneys aspects of our life. This is because people want to ensure that they can know the best for their own life. Different people will have different so this means of fact that they apply. One particular will define real truth that it is must be something that really concrete which that can be show either by using any 'method' or analytical analysis. Some of them will define truth that something which too abstract to discuss for. Thus this problem will bring these folks into some discussion in order to look for the real the fact is. In dictionary, reality is defined as a concept that is accepted by most people as being true. However in the real world, it generally does not seems to be like that. In essence we have to recognize that different portion of knowledge needs us to recognize different way to obtain the truth. For instance, different university student have various ways of learning style to be able to understand the subject coach by the professor. Some student might need to do the sensible learning such doing an test and some learner may prefer to review by itself before they can understand the topic. So in this article we covers the way which makes the simple truth is differ in three different region of knowledge (mathematics, arts and ethics). We would also cover how the universal fact can keep in mathematics, arts and ethics.
Basically, fact in math is focused on the proving. Man usually try to solve the formulation or getting the axiom before we can solve the mathematics problem. We also have to know that the reality in math does not relate to the true which differ to the arts and ethics. The thing that may be argue here's about just how that we invent the formulation or the axiom itself. Mathematicians who usually involve in inventing this axiom will usually try to find the pattern or the collection in math. For instance is the arimethic and geometric development. Mathematicians will determine this kind of style of the quantity that they obtain. Given some number such as 4, 3, 8/3, 5/2, 12/5, 7/3, and so on. Mathematicians will see that each term is added by two in order to get another term. Out of this design, the mathematicians can derive a formula which is ' ' that your 'n' represent the number of term that people want to investigate and 4 will be the first term. This may stand the axiom for this kind of series and sequences. At the same time we can see that whatever happen to real world doesn't have influence on the inventing of the axiom. .
In arts, there is no absolute real truth. Thus, if we talk about real truth, people will specify the truth in another way in arts. It is because the evaluation of fact and their understanding on it rely on their degree of senses they have. Compare to math and ethics, the truth in arts is merely influence by anything that occur to real life and this may be point out through the arts. To make clear this, we might make reference to the classical fine art which is the work of Greek and Roman ancient times. But as the Islamic period start to develop and at the same time the glory of Greek and Roman declining, the arts learn to change to the Medieval arts which withstand up to millennium. Then, with the start of Renaissance period, this narrative shifts into Early on Christian arts. Based on this activity of arts, we can easily see that there surely is no utter one fact. It will depend on our conception to the surrounding and exactly how our brain expresses it in to the arts. One thing that people all need to know is that there is no only 1 truth.
Compare to ethics, the truth value in ethics is will depend on individual perceptions and what they believe. This real truth value usually related to the moral value practice by the person itself and exactly how they placed the parameter for the reality to be exists. Absolutely people will place the parameter for the reality to be always a truth predicated on their moral value that they practice in their life. Thus, the truth value in ethics may change as they assume that they use is change. This is observe through this analogy. Person A say that alcohol consumption could cause him drunk and also put him into a risk to get many disease anticipated to utilization of alcohol. At exactly the same time another person called B assume that he is able to still drink the alcoholic beverages as long as he did not drunk and he still can do his work without affected by the liquor that he used. We can observe that the way the person A and B place their parameter either to drink the alcohol or not based on their own believe. Thus, different parameter gives us different value of fact. In a straightforward conclusion, we can say that the truth would be a truth so long as the moral value will not surpass the parameter established by each of us.
Another thing that we need to put into our concern is about how exactly the universal fact can tolerate in these three different regions of knowledge. Even as we can see, everyone recognize that " 1+1=2". Thus this provides the universal real truth to the people who agree to this truth. But think about if we bring the idea that we learned such as pi () to the alien? Are the value that people use holds true for the coffee lover? The answer is that the value of pi, is the widespread truth for those individuals that hold the same concept and understanding on the worthiness of pi, . So we can easily see that, the common truth of the math is come from the foundation of the maths itself and how exactly we define the reasoning in order to stand the axiom that can be use generally in most section of knowledge. If we understand math differently from the first of its technology, thus we will bring different universal truth in mathematics.
As being stated by the Aristotle, art work has an ability to signify the realities of individuals action and life. The art work is more concerned about the individual action and what happen to life while in mathematics most of enough time is approximately getting the axiom before getting the reality. At exactly the same time, it does not involve to the truth of individual action constantly and any right or incorrect action. For instance, in the real world, we have various kinds of music such as stones, ballad, traditional music, rap, and so on. Differing people will have different choices of music and it is does not to be a incorrect action if we are only interested to the ballad music compare to the others. Thus, this would be the universal truth for the people that like to pay attention to ballad music although they reside in the different place in the globe. They still can talk about anything that is related to the ballad music which is does not to be always a incorrect action if we like more than one type of music.
If we discuss deeper on ethics, what seems to be right for me does not be the same for the other folks. Every people need to set their own parameter in determine if the action used is right or wrong for their life. If everyone get into an contract on ethics, this will bring to the common fact in ethics. As an example, most of the people concur that it is incorrect to feed a traffic light when it is in red. Individuals who do not in the same lines with the folks that have established this rule are not involved in this universal real truth of ethic. Same would go to the religion where in fact the people talk about the same believes which placed the parameter for the supporters (if and only if the follower really maintain to the faith that they believe that). This will bring to the widespread real truth in ethics for the people that show the same believes.
As final result, different part of knowledge has different way in determine its truth where the math involve logic and a few assumptions to be able to stand an axiom also to make the method that people use every day inside our life to be true. Differ to the arts and ethics. In art, it does not have no one real truth for this which in differ on how people value their feelings and understanding to the truth that happens to the real world which involve the human actions. People that share same parameter because of their action and there would not never be considered a truth for folks that contain two parameters which contradicts to each other.
Eilenn Dombrowski, Lena Rotenberg, Mimi Bick, Theory of Knowledge Course Associate, 2007, Oxford College or university Press.
JW Phelan, Philosophy Styles and Thinkers, 2005, School Press, Cambridge.
Macmillan British Dictionary for Advanced Learners New Edition, 2007, Macmillan Publisher Small.
Nicholas Alchin, Theory of Knowledge Second Edition, 2006, Hodder Murray.
http://www. ciepfc. fr/spip. php?article135
http://www. cdtl. nus. edu. sg/ctp/maths. htm
http://www. newliturgicalmovement. org/2009/02/truth-of-beauty. html
http://www. tqnyc. org/2008/NYC085210/math. htm