We accept

Defining And Assessing Existentialism

Existentialism is a Humanism, to be individual is identified by an lifestyle (physical life) that precedes its substance (true dynamics). As a result, if lifetime is problematic, which is into the development of a complete existentialist theory of what it is usually to be real human that Sartre's work logically evolves. In relation to exactly what will become Being and Nothingness, Sartre's early works can be seen as providing important preparatory materials for an existential account of being human. But the distinctiveness of Sartre's method of understanding human presence is ultimately guided by his ethical interest. Thus the nature of Sartre's matters of research, his theory of the ego and his ethical aims all characterise the introduction of an existential phenomenology.

The general concern of existentialism is to provide an account of what it is similar to to exist as a human being in the world. Existentialism is a philosophical motion emphasizing individualism, individual flexibility, and subjectivity. Epistemologically, it is rejected that there can be an absolutely objective information of the world as it is minus the intervention of human being interests and activities. The planet is a 'given' and there is absolutely no epistemological scepticism about its lifestyle; it should be described in relation to ourselves. There is no fixed essence to which beings have to conform in order to define as humans; we are what we decide to be. The problem of independence and choice are of important importance in existentialism. Sartre thinks that authentic choices are completely undetermined. If we make our decisions only by reference to an external moral code or set of procedures, then we have been, similarly, not coming to authentic alternatives.

Key Things of Jean Paul Sartre's (1905 - 1980) existentialist Viewpoint:

1. "Existence precedes and rules essence"

Satire's ethical behavior acknowledges our independence on earth. We cannot conceal behind the safety of tradition, culture and the moral code. Being among the most famous and important existentialist propositions is Sartre's dictum, "existence precedes and guidelines essence", which is normally taken to mean that there is absolutely no pre-defined substance to humanity except whatever we make for ourselves. Since Sartrean existentialism will not acknowledge the life of a god or of any other determining principle, human beings are absolve to do as they choose. To have corresponding to these concepts means to stay in "bad beliefs" and is also unethical

Since there is no predefined human nature or ultimate evaluation beyond that which humans job onto the globe, people may only be judged or defined by their actions and choices, and human choices will be the ultimate evaluator. The idea of Existence preceding fact is important because it describes really the only conceivable simple fact as the judge of good or bad. If things simply "are", without directive, goal or overall real truth, then real truth (or substance) is only the projection of this which really is a product of lifestyle, or collective activities. For fact to exist, existence must exist before it, making it not only the predecessor but the 'ruler' of its own objectivity. "

2. Anguish

In Sartre's Existentialism, anguish is the sensation one gets when one identifies that a person is accountable not only for oneself, but for most of mankind. Along with lots of the other emotional areas detailed by existentialists, anguish can be paralytic, and one of the goals of existentialism is to force people toward action even when confronted with these thoughts.

3. Bad faith

Satre in essence not acknowledging that as a human being our lifestyle precedes our substance in the world therefore not acknowledging our very own capacity create our do it yourself through our choices. The "bad beliefs" experiences, "young female" and a "waiter", the young female delaying her moment in time of choice in a manner that for inauthentic and the waiter failing woefully to acknowledge to be a waiter and he has his choice to choose never to be a waiter. Both the young girl and the waiter put fact before existence nevertheless they are just a little different in their selections.

4. Being - in - itself

Being alone is the self-contained and completely became aware being of objects. It really is to be contrasted with the being, or lifestyle, of individuals. from the young girl story Ivich treats both Delarue and her own body as "being-in-itself". Relating to Sartre, humans want to realize being in itself while retaining their freedom, a propensity he dubs "the need to be God".

5. Being - for - others

Being for others, in Sartrean existentialism, is the fact part of individuals life that is public and socially identified. From the report of waiter he treat him/her self applied first and mainly as a "being-for-others". One path to bad trust is to view most of one's lifestyle as disclosed through others.

6. Being - for - self

To act in good beliefs we should treat self and others largely. Existentialism is not a complete viewpoint and many quarrels can be made against it. An accountant also a individual, sometimes he do accounting and sometimes do other things. A Existentialism, is that part - part, though inseparable from the rest - of individuals lifetime that is self-defined. Viewing real human existence as entirely self-defined is one way toward bad faith.

7. Despair

Sartre defines despair the feeling caused by the realization that there is no sure footing in the world, and we can never know the results of your actions ahead of time.


Existentialism is not really a perfect and complete beliefs and many arguments can be made against it. The philosopher Marcues criticized that if avery one is already free and they are walking on the roads they why bother to deal with for freedom? The competitors of existentialism assert which it fosters the particularization of human beings, stripping them of an general sense of identification, which is completely consistent with the says of existentialists that the only real common allowed for human beings is their fundamental flexibility. An another view is merely that existentialists are insane, which, many existentialists would reply, is correct, but, they might retort, only when you considered too little wish to live the original office life as reducible to insanity.


The existentialism is not a complete philosophy. It really is viewpoint which combines with Virtue ethics and deontology. Existentialist knowledge of what it is to be individual can be summarised in his view that the main motivation to use it is to be found in the nature of consciousness which really is a desire to have being. It is up to each agent to exercise his liberty in such a way that he does not lose look of his life as a facticity, and a free individual. By doing this, he'll come to comprehend more about the original choice which his expereince of living represents, and therefore about the values that are therefore projected. This understanding is only obtained through living this particular life and avoiding the pitfalls of strategies of self-deceit such as bad trust. This real option for human life represents the realisation of your universal in the singularity of the real human life. Existentialism declares that the average person must choose his way; there

is no predetermination. Because the universe is meaningless and absurd, people

must placed their own ethical standards. The universe does not predetermine moral

rules. Each individual strives toward a unique moral perfection. Existentialists think that morality is determined by the

individual, rather than supreme being.

More than 7 000 students trust us to do their work
90% of customers place more than 5 orders with us
Special price $5 /page
Check the price
for your assignment