Posted at 11.29.2018
Handwriting is being referred to as a lost art work, because of the introduction of technology in Americas school systems. On July 7, 2011, MSNBCs, Peter Jennings reported that, Illinois academic institutions would no more show cursive handwriting and that it is now optional to instruct cursive in forty-three other says (Jennings). In my own research for answers, I ran across many articles, studies, videos and publications, as to the reasons cursive handwriting is important for America's future. I found that though many teachers, scholars and mass media personalities, agreed that cursive handwriting should stay as part of the curriculum, most just accept and also decided that technology would be the way of teaching and learning in the foreseeable future of America's classes. I also found that America has a shortage of certain occupations that, today's American institution age children, will not be able to obtain without the developmental benefits that cursive handwriting provides, when they develop up (Wilm, 2). Within my research I ran across some articles that were in support of making cursive handwriting obsolete in America's schools. I came across a summary that said, that the importance of cursive handwriting in America's schools has been overshadowed by the option of personal computers, and smart cell phones (Gentry and Graham 4); Then i asked myself, "What kind of future will America's college get older children have with technology changing cursive handwriting?"
In an article by Marion Wilm, an occupational therapist in Charlotte, North Carolina, she states that handwriting is an art that uses the smallest muscles in the side that develop precision skills (2). These muscles will be the ones that help surgeons achieve their careers (Wilm, 2). Research shows that America already has a shortage of surgeons with these skills and needs attention (Pho, 1). Dr. Kevin Pho, MD. , says, "The number of general surgeons had a need to adequately serve the population is projected to be at least 7 per 100, 000 people (3). Currently there are about 18, 000 lively general surgeons in america or 5. 8 per 100, 000 people (3). The ratio of general cosmetic surgeons per 100, 000 society has fell by 26% within the last 25 years, " (3). Relating to Edward Tenner, a Princeton-based historian of culture and technology, who have researched the advancement of handwriting from the center Age ranges; argues that handwriting is just as valuable of an art for the 21st century as before (Arntzenius, 2). Tenner argues that cursive handwriting exercises significant relationships between the palm and the mind, and is a skill too important to get away from (Arntzenius, 4). When Tenner gave a presentation on the subject of "Handwriting after Gutenberg, " he found nearly all his audience was in support of keeping handwriting in the school curriculum (Tenner, 9). To his delight, "the children and teenagers appeared to be as overwhelmingly pro-handwriting as their elders. " (Tenner, 9)
In the Wall Block Journal, Gwendolyn Bounds reported on the benefits associated with educating handwriting and identified researchers who've used magnetic resonance imaging to show that handwriting helps children learn letters and figures and can even improve idea composition and appearance (Bounds, 2). Children learning handwriting is good exercise benefiting their electric motor skills and also for the introduction of the brain, which increases their potential to compose ideas, achieve goals throughout life (Bounds, 6). Frank Wilson, a neurologist and creator, composed that, "Although the repetitive drills that accompany handwriting lessons seem to be outdated, such physical training can help students to achieve success (Montemayor, 5). These activities stimulate brain activity, lead to increased vocabulary fluency, and assist in the introduction of important knowledge" (Montemayor, 5). The important part is the capacities of the activity of the hands that develop thinking and vocabulary and also, interest and the introduction of feeling of confidence in dept in the world all together; making cursive handwriting a vital requirement for the development of the caring and competent specific (Tenner, ). "There's good information that, like other varieties of manual exercise, learning some type of speedy writing, cursive or italic or perhaps both, is wonderful for the growing brain, " says Tenner (Arntzenius, 14).
Recent research shows that writing yourself helps one retain information, something to do with the fact that a letter drawn by hand requires several sequential finger moves (regarding multiple parts of the mind) instead of an individual keyboard faucet. How often have you observed someone say (or said yourself): "If I'm going to remember that I'll have to create it down. " Nevertheless, some respectable academics such as linguist Dennis Baron dispute against handwriting. In his book, "A Better Pencil: Readers, Freelance writers, and the Digital Revolution, " he compares the response against personal computers in the class to the anxiety and outrage that often employs the advantages of new technology. The printing press, he says, was referred to as disrupting the "almost spiritual connection" between writer and webpage; the typewriter was considered "impersonal and loud" when compared with the artwork of handwriting.
"A debate income as 45 says adopt college curriculum recommendations for 2014 that exclude cursive handwriting, but do require keyboard skills by enough time students exit primary school, " (Coyle). If research is discovering that cursive handwriting has many benefits, I do not understand why more educators and parents are not making initiatives to reinstate this skill back to America's institution systems. A ninth quality teacher said that many Americans are not aware that today's' modern youngsters have no idea how to learn or write cursive (Arcomano). Could it be true that the majority of parents are clueless to the actual fact that their student(s) have no idea how to learn cursive? Exactly what will happens when children want to learn about their ancestors and the only documents they find are written in cursive? I came across many forums and articles that claim that children will never be able to browse the U. S. Constitution some day. But we should go through the dilemna. American children are burning off an art that helps their brains, motor skills and feelings develop.
Technology which includes been integrated into America's institution system is thought to provide children with motivation, productivity, self- route, communication, and problem solving skills (ComputerLand). . It has opportunities such as greater usage of rich, multimedia system content, the increasing use of online course taking to provide classes not usually available, the popular availability of traveling with a laptop devices that can access the web, the widening role of public networking tools for learning and professional development, and the growing interest in the energy of digital video games for more customized learning (Technology in Education). Technology has also turn into a way of learning with reduced teaching from a instructor; it has substituted many literature and made information readily available through a press of a few control keys. Students from kindergarten thru the twelfth quality have desktop computer, laptops and most recently iPads available to them (Technology in Education). Students no more have the necessity to learn how to spell, due to spell check being open to practically every technological device getting the program installed.
Supporters of technology say that, "cursive was, but still is an art but not a necessity, " (Johnson). I agree with the fact technology is an extremely convenient way to complete certain responsibilities, but the fact of the problem is that there has not been enough research to confirm the statements made (Johnson). What profit does a child receive if they are not required to learn how to spell? My child struggles with spelling; he often asks me how to spell certain words. I get frustrated since when I attended university, spelling was a topic that my teachers emphasized on. Technology Just lately, I observed a commercial that was promoting a fresh computer program, the person spoke in to the head placed device and the words appeared on the computer screen. If this program were to be unveiled into America's university systems, what and exactly how would this be good for children? How will they learn skills that the old generations received when they attended school?
In bottom line there seems to be more research how cursive handwriting is beneficial in America's universities, than technology. You will find more teachers and physicians who have conducted extensive research and found that cursive handwriting should not be omitted from children's institution curriculums. Cursive handwriting is praised for its attributes for the development of children creatively, emotionally and psychologically. While technology is being promoted as beneficial to children, there has not been considerable research or studies to back again the promises made. Truth of the matter is that no one is really doing anything about it. So long as parents do not get informed and included, cursive handwriting won't be educated in universities.