Posted at 11.20.2018
The Vinland Sagas comprises of two distinct sagas, the saga of "The Greenlanders" and "Eirik the Red's Saga". The sagas contain the first description ever of THE UNITED STATES, before Christopher Columbus. The definition of any saga involves a long history or a tale of heroic accomplishments. The sagas add a variety of accounts that handled North America in the entire year 1000. They include the first successful excursions taken over the Atlantic Sea from Scandinavia. Most Voyages were carried out in an effort to spread religion, others were to obtain land. The sagas are the first experience with the local ethnic groups living in North America and exactly how they traded and battled. Between the sagas there have been several voyages; all of which were departing from Iceland, Norway, and Greenland. Many of these occasions were to create new opportunities or for popularity and lot of money. Throughout these sagas you might realize they act like one another. The accounts of Leif Eiriksson and Thorfinn Karlsefni comparison. The storyline of Leif and the breakthrough of Vinland differ in both of the sagas; Karlsefni's experiences vary in each of the sagas particularly the way the natives were portrayed.
Leif the Lucky was the kid of Eirik the red. Leif was the founder of Vinland in "The Saga of the Greenlanders" and "Eirik the Red's Saga", but the accounts behind the discovery were written in another way. In "Erik the Red's Saga", Leif settled in islands around Greenland, where he attained a woman, plus they had a child. Then he went on another voyage to Greenland. None of them of this is pointed out in "The Saga of this Greenlanders". In "The Saga of the Greenlanders" it is said that Leif went to many island such as Helluland and Markland. In both accounts Leif detects North America (Vinland). In the "Saga with the Greenlanders" he was said to of explored the land. In this exploration vines and grapes were found. Leif then named the
Land Vineland. "Erik the Red's Saga" goes in to practically no information about Vinland. This is how Vinland was described "he chanced upon land where he previously not expected any found. Fields of self-sown wheat and vines were growing there. " (p. 35). Although he does not name the land, one would conclude he was speaking of North America or Vinland. One would know that the two accounts were written about the same voyage because both accounts include how Leif kept the ship wrecked people and attained the nickname of Leif the Blessed. The two accounts also compare in this sense. In "Eirik the Red's Saga", Leif is sent to Greenland to pass on Christianity by Ruler Olaf. By the end of the bank account it is stated that Leif efficiently converted the united states to Christianity. There is absolutely no get spread around of Christianity is not mentioned in "The Saga of this Greenlanders".
Karlsefni was a prosperous man; he hitched Gudrid in both "The Saga of the Greenlanders" and "Eirik the Red's Saga". After the marriage Karlsefni wished to visit the land Leif founded, Vineland. In "The Saga of the Greenlanders" Karlsefni asked Leif for his properties in Vineland, and Karlsefni and his crew found its way to Vineland without going off course. "Eirik the Red's Saga" supports a different account. This account will not entail Leif. Also on the path to Vineland the staff had discontinued to explore lands, such as Helluland, Keep Island, Markland, and Keel Point. The accounts then fall into line again. Karlsfeni then traveled south to find Vineland. Once finding Vineland in both accounts Karlsefni is faced with natives. In "The Saga from the Greenlanders" Karlsefni was first approached by natives by walking while in 'Eirik the Red's Saga" they emerged in hide-covered boats. The two accounts both mentioned the natives and Karlsefni's staff trading but Karlsenfi wouldn't normally let weapons be bought and sold. In both accounts the natives were described as being brief in stature and having large eyes. Within the two accounts the challenge between Karlsefni, his companions and the natives had broken out for two different reasons. "The Saga of
the Greenlanders" told a story of the natives seeking to take weapons and being killed for these actions. But in "Eirik the Red's Saga" a bull got frightened the natives while these were trading. After these situations took place the natives returned and battled against Karlsefni and his staff. At the end of the struggle both accounts discuss the natives tests an axe. In "The Saga of the Greenlanders" it was said "one of the natives then found an axe, peered at it awhile and then aimed at one of his companions and struck him" (Kunz p. 17). "Eirik the Red's Saga" got a different storyline, it was said that "One of them found the axe and sliced at a tree, and then each needed a convert at it. "(Kunz p. 46). Karlsefni and his companions then fled the country.
One would consent these two sagas maintain value as historical documents. That is true because they keep information about the voyages Leif and Karlsefni got to Vineland. This supplies the reader data that Scandinavian explorers such as Leif and Karlsefni discovered THE UNITED STATES before Christopher Columbus. This is proof that Christianity was practiced in THE UNITED STATES in the entire year 1000. But to compare both sagas hand and hand, you can conclude that "Eirik the Red's Saga" is a more valuable historical source in the fact that the voyages get into more detail, with techniques such as explaining just how natives work. Also how it will go more in-depth in Leif's voyage. It shows how Christianity was multiply to THE UNITED STATES through King Olaf.
I feel the accounts of Leif Eiriksson and Thorfinn Karlsefni contrasted. By the way the accounts in each of the sagas depicted Leif's time put in in North America and the way the natives were portrayed in Karlsefnis voyage to Vinland. You can conclude this essay knowing that "The Saga of the Greenlanders" and "Eirik the Red's Saga" are comparable when looked at hand and hand. Kunz says this here "when it comes to the Vinland voyages themselves, the sagas give two versions" (Kunz p. xviii). The accounts of both Leif and Kalrsefni left out key differences within each passing. I feel this could be connected to the origins of who published it and in what country. 3