PLAGIARISM FREE WRITING SERVICE
We accept
MONEY BACK GUARANTEE
100%
QUALITY

Concepts of Professional Ethics and Moral Responsibility

Group Users:

  • Cheong Loong TAN
  • Yehya ELLEISSY
  • Xavier VUONG
  • Chenkai JIN

Ethical Dilemma

The development of the product/service is to meet end user's satisfaction and keeping them good progress of technology. Such entertainment is always to provide the user with the ability to create 3D items by using software and a 3D computer printer, allow users to talk about their thoughts on facts or ideas without limitation and even provide users with a device that functions as a life friend.

The underlying moral issue in the circumstance is the misuse of the products and services, which the majority of the time results unethical behaviour. For the purpose of this research, unethical behavior will be defined as any behaviour that violates or disturbs the moral code of the contemporary society. For instance, it is unethical to speak of a person in the lack of their presence, since it causes harm to the victim's reputation. Taking this into consideration, Facebook is the largest host of unethical behavior, as this occurs on a regular basis. Another product that is often remarked to be questionable is the Google Glass, a product that combines video recording/voice recording with the ability to connect to the internet in device that users wear around their eyes as spectacles. This raises questions surrounding level of privacy of folks around an individual, as they'll not take note if an individual has turned on the record function. Last but not least, the 3D printing device, ever since its creation has caused ethical problems with the user able to create firearms that cannot be detected by material detectors. These products will be further talked about in the first question, with regards to the duty of the companies and company that develop them.

The scenario offered outlines some of the ethical conditions that could happen if using those products. These moral dilemmas are issues such as privacy invasion, security related problems and the user's potential to cause harm to another. Through this analysis, we will discuss the products and services in question by exploring their features, and what damage they are capable of creating when abused. Then we will move to answer the question of set up companies or organisations should be performed accountable for the top features of their products and services that allow users to make moral decisions. Followed by this question is a set of possible solutions to the problems provided in the last question.

The ethical problem certainly is out there within the circumstance, but if it is the work of the organisations and companies to have responsibility for the actions with their users is question that will be analysed.

Should Companies/Organizations be held responsible

Companies would create these products and services with the objective of fulfilling the users while abiding by the laws. The condition with the entertainment provided occurs when the end users abuse the system, and for the reason that they could make morally inappropriate decisions which have an impact on other folks. The offenders are just in a position to commit the maltreatment because there is no restriction; therefore the question increased to attention is that 'Should the companies/organizations that develop these products/services be placed in charge of "moral decision making software code and features" that they included in them?'

For the goal of this examination, "Moral-decision-making software code and features" is thought as the certain areas of products and services that donate to morality.

User

Many product and service offered allows user expressing their creativeness, thoughts and ideas. A 3D printing device allows end user to print alive anything they are able to model using software, and a Yahoo Glass allows user to assimilate all common solutions into one small device to be utilized anywhere. Social media such as Facebook allows end user to talk about, comment, vote, and even act as an advertising program for company. Nevertheless, there are present a certain group of customer that exploit the product either for fame, or money purposes.

A good example will be a 3D printer. The printer depends on the creative imagination of the user itself. When the printer premiered, the significant problem encountered was firearm printing. An individual go through the internet enables end user to download a weapon blueprint and then loading it in to the software and instantly an exceptionally dangerous goods was produced. In country where firearms are difficult to obtain, these firearms can be easily developed using a 3D printing device and costing only about $25 of vinyl with moderately high toughness (O'Callaghan, 2014), which problem happens to be on the rise (Wilson, 2014). Based on our survey survey, 50% of the individuals concur that 3D computer printer should be readily available.

Another example would be using Facebook as a tool for committing offense. Cyber bullying, stalking, and uploading photographs and videos of individuals without their consent are incredibly common in Facebook. Professional hackers exploit the vulnerabilities in Facebook and accumulate target's private information such as name, address, contact number and bank information. A few of them even impersonate as family members, family or friends to gather sensitive information. Bribery often happens with risk of uploading hypersensitive information/pictures on Facebook. Often this leads to suicidal when patients are too frustrated and cannot handle the strain (Arkell, 2013).

Facebook doesn't have the choice of deleting bill - a complete swipe out of user's information. The only choice was deactivating the accounts. This may appear to be useful when a user changes his/her brain, as they can reactivate back again their account any moment. However this posts an enormous security problem. Imagine if a hacker exploits Facebook Databases and show out all the very sensitive information? From our review report, most the user needs the choice of deleting bill to be integrated.

Looking at the cases above, the situation is out there because companies aren't being held accountable for the activities of an individual. Companies/organizations are aware of these problems nonetheless it is beyond their capability to prevent this from going on as some of the user continually exploits and misuse the merchandise. Every consumer should be informed on the duty in their doings while retaining a professional ethics.

Professionals

The counter discussion shown by professional state governments that user should be in charge of their own welfare and behaviour while using these product. This is a valid affirmation, as it is the user's activities that lead to unethical behavior, not the merchandise. The merchandise was made with the motive of doing within the laws of the country, and not to create any unethical problems.

The 3D printer's potential to set-up firearms was not the initial purpose by the product manufacturer but rather the user itself. Besides, firearms made are not durable enough, rather than functional in long term. Yahoo Glass's privacy issue is questioned because end user is deploying it in the general public area. If it's for personal use then there would be no level of privacy concern.

Wallach and Allen (2009) illustrate an actual case where semiautonomous robotic cannon malfunctioned getting rid of 9 soldiers and wounding 14 others on Oct 2007. The debate here matches the original discussion, that companies should be accountable for the "moral-decision-making software code" in the machine. In cases like this, the company would be held accountable because they did not ensure that system proved helpful correctly.

In conclusion, the company or organisation in charge of the product/service shouldn't be held accountable for the morally inappropriate actions of these consumers. Although it may seem, from the quarrels above they are most definitely dependable, it was consumer's option to choose the product. Therefore, this research facilitates the professional assertion that consumers should be accountable for their own welfare when using these products.

What else needs to be done to resolve the underlying issue?

Companies that develop these products with shouldn't be kept full responsibility for the misuse of it. Mainly it is the user that determines how it can be used and when it is utilized in an unethical manner or not. Instead, might know about be concentrating and spending our time in is what can be done to resolve those actual issues. Take one of the most exciting progress in technology today, Google Glass, for an example.

Google Goblet is a modern technology in the shape of the eyewear device that can take photographs, videos, and even behaving as a Gps unit device, but this feature concerns the violation of personal privacy. For example, user may take images or even track record a video of another individual without their consent as the device itself mimicked a set of glasses with no indication a recording is being done. Another major concern concerns public safeness. When using Yahoo Glass Gps navigation feature, the overlay and prompts look may distract the drivers from noticing incoming traffic, road blocks and pedestrians. Fatal incident may arise for this reason.

Solutions

Here are some suggestions/ways to cope with the issue

Ethics and Privacy

Beeping tone being emitted when a user capture a picture or make a taking. This is to point to an individual and surrounding general public that pictures are being captured or a tracking has been made. Public should be informed and prepared about Google Glass features and features. This can be achieved through advertisements TV ads, sociable press and internet.

Safety

Laws and legislations should be carried out and enforced on the utilization of Google Cup when driving. Generating while using Yahoo Glass shouldn't be allowed, as it poses a risk to both the driver and bordering public.

Educate user

User should be well informed on the do's and don'ts with all the device. Workshop, training, and workshops should be conducted from time to time to raise recognition in professional ethics regarding technology. User should also come in contact with laws and procedures that govern personal privacy.

Google A glass was just one single example of how alternatives can be provided to it problems and never have to place responsibility on the companies/organisations moral-decision-making software code and features. When these three solutions are applied to other products, unethical behavior should drop.

Taking Facebook as an example, the best answer here would be to instruct the users on the privacy policy and setting to be able to avoid people connecting to other who they don't know, or may be under a incorrect personal information. Also, users will remember that information that they post onto Facebook is available for Facebook to use.

As for 3D printers, having users informed about safe practices is important because the data can stop users from producing firearms. Because the firearms are not very durable, and are not being developed appropriately, an individual could cause severe injury to himself if the firearm explodes. Also if the individual is educated about the laws and regulations the consequences of developing against the law firearms, it can provide as a deterrent.

References

Arkell, H. (November 26, 2013). DailyMail. In Coroner warns of dangers of Facebook after student, 19, targeted by young women bullies online hanged himself. Retrieved Aug 10, 2014, from http://www. dailymail. co. uk/news/article-2513782/Facebook-bullies-led-suicide-

O'Callaghan, J. (May 16, 2014). DailyMail. WITHIN THE terrifying simple fact of 3D-printed weapons: Devices that ANYONE can make are quickly changing into deadly weapons. Retrieved Aug 10, 2014, from http://www. dailymail. co. uk/sciencetech/article-2630473/The-terrifying-reality-3D-printed-guns-Devices-ANYONE-make-quickly-evolving-deadly-weapons. html.

Wilson, L. (June 18, 2014). Information. In Surge of 3D-branded handguns and illegally constructed firearms sparks demand Senate inquiry. Retrieved Aug 10, 2014, from http://www. news. com. au/technology/rise-of-3dprinted-handguns-and-illegally-assembled-firearms-sparks-call-for-senate-inquiry/story-e6frfrnr-1226957787578.

Professional Ethics And Moral Responsibility Survey

1. Could it be rude to Google someone's account while looking at them using a Google A glass?

Agree

Tend to Agree

Tend to Disagree

Disagree

I don't know

Other (please designate)

2. Does one agree with Yahoo using personalized ads for marketing purposes?

Agree

Tend to Agree

Tend to Disagree

Disagree

I don't know

Other (please designate)

3. Should Facebook allow users to delete their accounts (All information/pictures will be completely removed)?

Agree

Tend to Agree

Tend to Disagree

Disagree

I don't know

Other (please identify)

4. Do you think 3D computer printer should be legalized in Australia?

Yes

No

I don't know

Other (please identify)

5. Could it be necessary for companies/colleges to have admission in monitoring network activities by individuals?

Yes

No

I don't know

Other (please designate)

6. Should companies/organizations be presented responsible for "moral decision making software code and features" that they built into them?

Yes

No

I don't know

Other (please designate)

7. Do you consider companies/organizations should execute whistle blowing coverage?

Yes

No

I don't know

Other (please specify)

8. What penalty should be imposed on companies/organizations that violates or disclose user's information?

Jail

Fine

Compensation

No penalty

I don't know

Other (please designate)

Powered by SurveyMonkey

More than 7 000 students trust us to do their work
90% of customers place more than 5 orders with us
Special price $5 /page
PLACE AN ORDER
Check the price
for your assignment
FREE