The Bridge to Gretna case study is defined in Greta following Hurricane Katrina. That revolves around evacuees to Gretna from Fresh Orleans. The residents of New Orleans had been promised meals, water, shelter, etc . when they arrived to Gretna; yet , the interaction between the metropolitan areas was scarce. There were several reports of violence by New Orleans residents in Gretna. This led to most of Gretna citizens fleeing, however, many were also scared to leave. Pursuing many lootings and physical violence, the connection to Gretna was closed off. This was supposed to cause a safer Gretna; however , closing the link left various wounded people in Fresh Orleans devoid of anywhere to travel. The Gretna police force possibly fired above the heads in the people looking to cross over the bridge. The Gretna Metropolis Council supported the decision to dam the bridge and the police's use of guns.
A lot of important moral questions to consider include: How come was generally there no evacuation plan set up prior to the typhoon? Why was food, drinking water, shelter and buses promised? What kind of rumors had been circulating in the media? In which did the Gretna residents go? So why were people looting stores? Was it right to close the link? Why would the police need to use guns to keep out New Orleans residents? Exactly why is Gretna staying protected but not New Orleans? Why would New Orleans decide to mail evacuees to Gretna? Why did Creciente Ronnie Harris defend the authorities?
In order to totally comprehend the size of this honest situation, further research should be conducted. With regards to whether or not the rules is on the side of Gretna is challenging. "The Great Court hasn't explicitly found that a basic right to intrastate travel is present, " (Crusto, 2008). Although...
... etna was mainly because they were lied to you to. They were told that buses and supplied would be waiting for the in Gretna; that is why they will walked right over to the bridge. The residents of recent Orleans will be the victims, plus they do not deserve punishment for the.
Concluding this job helped me tremendously. I feel as though I have learned how to consider something in an orderly way, and that I can think even more logically easily dedicate a chance to an issue. We started having a topic that I knew very little about, nevertheless I finished up researching this and thinking about it so usually that I came to a sound conclusion in the ethics of the situation. I am hoping that I can apply the critical pondering model I actually learned from this paper to my life. I think it could gain me considerably in making decisions, as I have always found personally to be very indecisive.