We accept

Comparison of Perfect and Imperfect Competition


The Daddy of Economics Adam Smith in his book " THE IDEA of Moral Sentiments", wrote about the primary characteristics of human beings. Relating to him a human being is very selfish or possesses self-love as well as there is an invisible palm. The idea of self- love in individual is one of the most crucial element in " the worthiness theory" as well as in the development of market. [1]

Generally a individual carries out financial activities till a spot where he believes that what I am paying is add up to what I am getting, Human being willingly trade or perform exchange till he feels that what I am supplying is less and what I am obtaining is more, once he realises that what I am offering is add up to what I am acquiring, he will stop further trade.

This is one of the most crucial school of thought of consumers and producers. Both the concept is based on selfish motives of maximising earnings in terms of their work that is money. Since an overall economy involves various economic providers with diverse hobbies, allocating resources optimally becomes an complex task. Economical planners have two mutually opposing methods to solve this allocation problem: planning versus competition. Which avenue will be adopted by the planners will depend crucially on the value judgments.


"Originally" says Jevons, : a market was a general population place in a town where provisions and other things were exposed for sale; but the world has been generalised in order to signify any body of people who are in close business relationships and keep on extensive transactions in virtually any commodity.

In what of Cournot, a French economist, "Economics understand by the word market no particular market placec where things are bought and sold however the overall of any region in which buyers and retailers are in such free intercourse with each other that the price tag on the same goods tends to equality easily and quickly. "

Thus, the requirements of market are:

  1. A item which is handled.
  2. The presence of purchasers and sellers
  3. A place, be it certain region, country or planet.
  4. Such intercourse between purchasers and vendors that only 1 price should prevail for the same item at exactly the same time.


Perfect competition is a theoretical market framework. Perfect competition is the world of price-takers. A perfectly competitive firm offers a homogenous product. It is so small in accordance with its market it cannot affect the marketplace price; it simply will take the price as give.

Under perfect competition, there are many buyers and retailers, and prices reflect resource and demand. Also, consumers have many substitutes if the nice or service they would like to buy becomes very costly or its quality commences to fall short. New firms may easily enter the marketplace, generating additional competition. Companies earn sufficient profit to stay in business and no more, because if they were to earn surplus profits, other companies would enter the market and drive profits back down to the smallest amount.

Real-world competition differs from the textbook style of perfect competition in many ways. Real companies try to make their products different from those of their competition. They advertise to try to gain market share. They cut prices to attempt to take customers from other businesses. They raise prices in the anticipation of increasing gains. And some companies are large enough to influence market prices. But the perfect competition model is not an ideal that people should try to achieve in the real world.

Features of Perfect Competition

  1. There are many small organizations, each producing an identical product.
  2. Each too small to influence the marketplace price.
  3. The perfect competitior faces a completely horizontal demand curve.
  4. The extra revenue gained from each extra device sold is which means selling price.
  5. Freedom of Access and Exit; this will demand low sunk costs. [2]

Diagram for Perfect Competition

These factors are unrealistic in the real world. However Perfect Competition is as important monetary model to compare other models. It is often argued that competitive markets have benefits which stem from this theoretical model.

  • In the Industry price depends upon the connection of Source and Demand.
  • The organization will maximise end result where MR = MC at Q1
  • In the long term Firms can make Normal gains.

If Supernormal gains are made new firms will be attracted in to the industry creating prices to show up. If businesses are making a damage then organizations will leave the industry causing price to go up. [3]

Assumptions behind a Beautifully Competitive Market

1. Many suppliers each with an insignificant show of the market - this means that each firm is too small relative to the overall market to have an effect on price via a change in its own supply - every individual organization is assumed to be a price taker

2. An identical output produced by each firm - in other words, the market materials homogeneous or standardised products that are perfect substitutes for each other. Consumers perceive the merchandise to be identical

3. Consumers have perfect information about the costs all sellers on the market demand - so if some firms decide to bill a price higher than the ruling market price, there will be a large substitution effect from this firm

4. All businesses (industry members and new entrants) are assumed to own equal usage of resources (technology, other factor inputs) and improvements in production technology achieved by one company can spill-over to all the other suppliers in the market. [4]


Imperfect competition is a competitive market situation where there are numerous sellers, however they are available heterogeneous (dissimilar) goods as opposed to the perfect competitive market scenario. As the name suggests, competitive market segments that are imperfect in aspect.

Imperfect competition is the real world competition. Today a few of the companies and sellers abide by it to earn surplus income. In this market scenario, the seller enjoys the blissful luxury of influencing the price in order to earn more revenue. It prevails within an industry whenever specific sellers have some way of measuring control over the price of their output. Take the example of Coco-cola and perpsi mutually have majpr show of the market, and imperfect competition obviously prevails.

If a seller is reselling a non-identical good in the market, then he can raise the costs and earn gains. High profits appeal to other retailers to enter the market and retailers, who are incurring losses, can quickly exit the market. The major types of imperfect competition are : monopoly, oligopoly and monopolistic competition.

Monopolistic Competition: This market structure is seen as a a large variety of relatively small rivals, each with a modest amount of market controlon the supply side. An integral feature of monopolistic competition is product differentiation. The outcome of each producer is an in depth but not indistinguishable substitute compared to that of every other firm, which helps satisfy diverse consumer desires and needs.

Oligopoly: This market structure is characterized by a small quantity of relatively large competitors, each with large market control. Oligopoly retailers exhibit interdependent decision making which can lead to intense competition among the few and the drive to cooperate through mergers and collisions.

Monopoly: Monopolies are thus seen as a a lack of economiccompetitionto produce thegoodorserviceand a lack of viablesubstitute goods. Monopoly can be an enterprise that is the only seller of any good or service. Within the absence of federal treatment, a monopoly is free to placed any price it chooses and will usually set the price that yields the largest possible income. Just being a monopoly need not make an enterprise more profitable than other corporations that face competition, the marketplace may be so small that this barely facilitates one venture.

But if the monopoly is in fact more profitable than competitive companies, economists expect that other entrepreneurs will enter the business enterprise to capture some of the higher results. If enough rivals type in, their competition will drive prices down and eliminate monopoly power.


A differentiation has been made between perfect and imperfect competition. " Market is reported to be perfect when all the potential sellers and clients are promptly aware of the prices of which transactions take place and all the offers created by other sellers and buyers, so when any buyer can purchase from any retailer. Same price same item same times is vital feature of perfect market. [5]

On the other side, market is imperfect when some potential buyers or retailers or both are not aware of the prices made by others. Different prices come to prevail for the same item at the same time within an imperfect market.






Perfect Competition

Many products; identical products.

Financial markets and agricultural products


Market exchange or auction.

Imperfect Competition


Monopolistic Competition

Many manufacturers; many real differences in products.

Retail trade like pizzas, beverage.


Advertising and quality rivalry implemented prices.


Few producers; little or no difference in product.

Steel, chemicals


Advertising and quality rivalry administered prices.


Single company; product without close substitutes.

Franchise monopolies like electricity, water, drugs




In economics, fundamentally demand is the tool for a good or service of your economic agent, in accordance with his income. Demand is a buyer's determination and potential to pay a price for a particular level of a good or service.

Demand identifies how much (quantity) of a product or service is desired by buyers at various prices. The number demanded is the quantity of something people are willing to buy at a certain price; the partnership between price and variety demanded is recognized as the demand.

The term demand indicates the ability or the willingness to buy a specific commodity at a given point of energy.

In the above mentioned diagram, PART A shows that the perfect competition encounters a horizontal demand curve, indicating that it can sell all it needs at the heading market price. The price elasticity is correctly elastic. When there is certainly pure competition, because the number of businesses is large, no individual has power to influence the marketplace price. Also, since the products are indistinguishable from the consumer's viewpoint, the price paid by them can not be different. OX and OY are two axes. Along OX is the result and the OY is the price/revenue. At OP price a owner can sell as much as he prefers. He cannot bill more and not ask for less because then he'll lose all his customers.

PART B says that an imperfect competition, on the other hand, faces a downward sloping demand curve. Meaning that if an imperfect competitive firm raises its sales, it will definitely depress the marketplace price of its end result as it goes down its dd curve. The price elasticity is finite elastic. [6]


Competitive organization has immediate implications for the market supply curve and regulations of supply. The principal conclusion is that a perfectly competitive firm's short-run resource curve is that portion of its marginal cost curve that sits above the common adjustable costcurve.

A perfectly competitive organization produces the number of outcome that equates marginal income, which is add up to price, and marginal cost, as long as price surpasses average changing cost. The profit-maximizing options of result at choice prices create the perfectly competitive firm's short-run resource curve.

Consider three key points:

  1. A profit-maximizing firm produces the amount of outcome that equates marginal income and marginal cost (MR = MC).
  2. A correctly competitive firm is seen as a the equality between price and marginal income (P = MR).
  3. The legislations of diminishing marginal earnings provides marginal cost curve an optimistic slope.

Combining all three things means a profit-maximizing correctly competitive company produces the amount of outcome that equates price and marginal cost (P = MC).

  • An increase in the price, steps the profit-maximizing amount to an increased point on the positively-sloped marginal cost curve, and a more substantial production amount.
  • A reduction in the price, goes the profit-maximizing amount to a lesser point on the positively-sloped marginal cost curve, and an inferior production amount.


In the post independence period, India adopted highly restrictive professional policy. India's industrial licensing insurance policy created entrance barriers for private companies in areas earmarked on their behalf and hence didn't promote 'perfect competition'. Indian planners who believed in the doctrine of 'child industry discussion' provided necessary cover to domestic producers from international competition via tariff barriers.

During this regulated routine, however, India's professional growth rate was not appealing. In India, under Structural Adjustment Programme (SAP), industrial licensing insurance policy was abolished and tariff and quantity constraints on imports were also dispensed with. Thus the New Economic Policy made an effort to market a competitive market system in India. As a result India's professional sector started exhibiting some signs of improvement in terms of growth. [7]

In the real world, situations like perfect market prevails for markets for most of unbranded staple goods such as food grain and vegetables. Nonetheless it should be noted that there is a style of branding increasingly more of such goods also, and in this ways making their markets become more and more like oligopolistic marketplaces.

In a monopoly like in Saudi Arabia the government has single control over the oil industry. A monopoly may also form when a company has a copyright or patent that stops others from joining the marketplace. Pfizer, for case, had a patent on Viagra. In an oligopoly, suppose, for example, an current economic climate needs only 100 widgets. Company X produces 50 widgets and its own rival, Company Y, produces the other 50. The costs of both brands will be interdependent and, therefore, similar. So, if Company X starts offering the widgets at a lesser price, it will get a larger market share, therefore forcing Company Y to lessen its prices as well. You will find two extreme types of market framework: monopoly and, its opposite, perfect competition. Perfect competition is characterized by many purchasers and vendors, many products that are similar in aspect and, because of this, many substitutes. Perfect competition means there are few, if any, barriers to entry for new companies, and prices are dependant on supply and demand. Thus, providers in a properly competitive market are at the mercy of the prices dependant on the market and don't have any leverage. For example, in a correctly competitive market, should an individual firm opt to increase its selling price of an good, the consumers can just use the nearest competitor for a better price, creating any firm that improves its prices to lose market talk about and gains.


The use of the assumption of perfect competition as the building blocks ofprice theoryfor product marketplaces is often criticized as representing all real estate agents as unaggressive, thus removing the active makes an attempt to increase one's welfare or profits by price undercutting, product design, advertising, innovation, activities that - the critics argue - characterize most business and markets. These criticisms indicate the frequent insufficient realism of the assumptions ofproduct homogenity and impossibility to differentiate it, but aside from this the accusation of passivity shows up correct limited to short-period or very-short-period analyses, in long-period analyses the inability of price to diverge from the natural or long-period price is due to energetic reactions of entry or exit.

Some economists have an alternative kind of criticism regarding perfect competition model. They aren't criticizing theprice taker assumption because it makes economic providers too "passive", but because it then boosts the question of who places the prices. Indeed, if everyone is price taker, there may be the necessity for a benevolent planner who offers and sets the costs, in other word, there's a dependence on a "price maker". Therefore, it creates the perfect competition model appropriate not to explain a decentralize "market" current economic climate but a centralized one. This in turn means that such kind of model has more regarding communism than capitalism.

Another frequent criticism is that it's often not true that in the short run dissimilarities between source and demand cause changes in price; especially in developing, the more prevalent behavior is alteration of creation without practically any alteration of price.


In this commercial and competitive world not everyone has an opportunity to excel. Sometimes there exists boom period throughout the market when the firm's income flourishes while at other times there can be a depression which will create losses for the firm. It is thus a firm's ability to manage its resources carefully and feasibly.

Why do consumers spend their income on new brands? A classical reference may maintain order: "The love of novelty manifests itself evenly in those who find themselves well off and in those who are not. For. . . men get tired of prosperity, just as they are suffering from the opposite. . . . This love of change. . . starts the best way to everyone who can take the lead in virtually any innovation in virtually any country. "

Thus, in an economy there will be different types of market and each market will have its own benefits and drawbacks it just depends upon the various innovations they undertake to attract more consumers. Both perfect and imperfect tournaments stand out in their fields.



  1. Nordhaus, Samuelson. (2008) Economics. Tata Mc-Graw-Hill Publishing Company Small.
  2. Dewett, K. K. , Nevalur, M. H. , Modern Economic Theory, S. Chand, New Delhi, 2010.


  1. http://www. economicshelp. org/microessays/markets/perfect-competition/
  2. http://teacher2u. net/economics/content/issues/competition/competition. htm
  3. http://www. economicshelp. org/microessays/markets/perfect-competition/
  4. http://www. cci. gov. in/May2011/Advocacy/essay2012/jyoti. pdf

[1] Dewett, K. K. , Nevalur, M. H. , Modern Economic Theory, S. Chand, New Delhi, 2010.

[2] http://www. economicshelp. org/microessays/markets/perfect-competition/

[3] http://www. economicshelp. org/microessays/markets/perfect-competition/

[4] http://teacher2u. net/economics/content/matters/competition/competition. htm

[5] Dewett, K. K. , Nevalur, M. H. , Modern Economic Theory, S. Chand, New Delhi, 2010.

[6] Nordhaus, Samuelson. (2008) Economics. Tata Mc-Graw-Hill Posting Company Small.

[7] The Index of Industrial Creation (IIP) was 6. 2 percent for April-Dec, 1999.

More than 7 000 students trust us to do their work
90% of customers place more than 5 orders with us
Special price $5 /page
Check the price
for your assignment