Technology, Technology and Human Values in Henrik Ibsen's Opponent of the People and Kurt Vonnegut's Slaughterhouse-Five
Every day I personally use technology and science, through the allergy supplement I decide to use my cell phone and my personal Apple enjoy, technology is a vital part of my time. Are the individual values of integrity, credibility and amazing advantages a part of my personal everyday life, even though? Everyone wants to trust they are a great person, yet there are so many items in life that aren't great or confident at all, it truly is apparent that people-who want to think they are good-do suggest things. Some of the worst everything is done with among the best intentions, together with the idea that the ends warrant the means. Science can easily improve a number of things, like your life expectancy, but can it improve the quality of life? Technology without honnete to support it can be a dangerous factor. This is observed in several of the works we have read this semester, including Henrik Ibsen's Enemy of the Persons and Kurt Vonnegut's Slaughterhouse-Five.
In Foe of the People, we see that science and technology are at the mercy of those who also hold electricity, in this case, personal power. Dr . Stockmann has discovered, through the use of research, that there is a problem with the monetary center of the town-the bath. It is not Doctor Stockmann's make use of science that questions the compatibility of science and human principles, but his bother, Peter Stockmann's use of technology. Peter is able to control the paper, and therefore popular opinion, from Dr . Stockmann (Act 3). The paper is a form of technology that allows news of many events to succeed in the common person. However , this kind of holds a lot of responsibility with it. Whoever manages what goes inside the paper is able to shape public opi...
... difficult to consist of morals in decision-making. It is much simpler to never think of the effects of one's actions. However , in the event everyone do this, society would quickly disband. We all need to start thinking of their actions as having consequences that affect more than just themselves, and they must keep this kind of in mind when creating decisions. Crucial thinking is difficult, and it's not one of the most pleasant point, but as Bandeja has Socrates say in the Apology, "The unexamined life is not well worth living" (West & West, 92). Except if we integrate human beliefs into scientific research and technology, we will be living a your life not worth living.
Lippmann, Walter. The Public Philosophy. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers, 2k.
West, Style S., Jones West. Text messaging on Socrates: Plato and Aristophanes. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1998.