We accept

Compare And Comparison Perfect Competition


First of all, matching to John Wiley and Sons (1995), perfect competition is kind of market composition that processed the next factors: each company is so small compared to the market and the influence on price is elastic; the product is homogeneous; there are freedom changes of most resources which includes free entry and exits of firms in and out of the market segments and there is ideal knowledge between the buyers and the retailers so buyers know what prices are firms charging. A firm that is flawlessly competitive usually runs at an result level where earnings is maximized.

As for monopolistic competition, they have some features in common with perfect competition and monopoly. Three key factors can be described as monopolistic competition which is each firm has just a little amount of market vitality because the companies are really competitive; organizations can type in and exit freely of the industry if the level of profits is appealing and the revenue is maximized. However, compare to monopoly, each one of the organizations is facing a downward sloping demand curve.

The comparison between perfect competition and monopolistic competition.

There a wide range of similar features between perfect and monopolistic competition. Both perfect competition and monopolistic competition has large number of firms which can be compete each other. They both have the flexibility of entrance and exit of firm since they are offering almost similar products to the consumers. The breakeven point is shaped where marginal cost is add up to marginal revenue. Inside the both market conditions, firms can earn unusual or super revenue and also can incurred brief run lose. For long run creation, businesses only can earn normal earnings.

Furthermore, both perfect and monopolistic competition can benefits the client by pricing which is very competitive. Individuals are freely to compare the costs of the similar products and choose the best among of the all. Individuals are usually prefer to buy the product which is good in quality and affordable.

Comparison between perfect competition and monopolistic competition.

For illustration perfect competition doesn't have the capability to affect the marketplace price because they are price takers because price depends upon the demand and supply of the consumers or suppliers. It cannot impact the price by only performance. As for monopolistic competition, each one of the firm has a very small degree of selling price control. In addition, all organizations have its own price plan which established by the federal government and they are required to follow the price of the products that they got to sell to the consumers.

In the perfect competition, each company produces and provides homogeneous products so that buyer does not have the chance of choosing for the commodity of any vendor over others. Other than that, there is certainly product differentiation in monopolistic competition. The merchandise may be similar however they are usually more to non-identical to the other person or they can say to be close substitutes.

Perfectly and monopolistically competitive companies are free to enter and exit of the industry but also for monopolistically competitive companies may have few restrictions nonetheless they are greatly unrestricted in terms of government rules and regulation, obstacles to entry or even start-up cost. For the properly competitive firms, they also not restricted however, many case like businesses that incurred high cost, they'll have to get the authorization from the federal government to type in the industry. The monopolistically competitive companies are not flawlessly mobile when compared with perfectly competitive organizations.

In monopolistic competition, clients have perfect understanding of the prices that arranged by the vendors. One businesses cannot sells higher price of goods than others if not the consumers changes to other retailers as they are price flexible. All flawlessly competitive firms will need to have the same creation techniques or technology and they cannot produce goods better or faster with special knowledge. As for monopolistic competition, buyers do not know everything about the costs, but they have close information about alternate prices of other organizations.

Figure 1

As shown in the figure 1 above, the demand curve AR, average earnings of a properly competitive organization is perfectly flexible and MR, the marginal revenue curve occupy same place with it. For monopolistic competition, the demand curve of a firm is stretchy and downward slopping and its equivalent MR, marginal earnings curve locates below it. It establish that a company must increase its sales by minimizing the price tag on its product to attract some consumers from others opponents, provided the price is not reduced later.

Though the equilibrium areas that both market conditions will be the same yet somehow there are distinctions in the romantic relationships of price marginal cost between the two tournaments. Under perfect competition MC add up to MR, price also equals included in this because price is AR identical MR. This also describe that the AR curve is horizontal to the X axis which means the price stay the same all the time. For monopolistic competition, the AR curve was downward slopping to the left, the MR curve was below than it. So price can be condition as AR bigger MR equal MC.

Dissimilarities among both market situations match their dimensions. In the long run competitive firms that happen to be in how big is optimum and they will produce their products completely capacity for the reason of AR equivalent LMC identical LAC at its minimum amount level. But for monopolistic competition firms will tend to be less than the perfect size and process in surplus capacity because the AR curve is downward slopping and cannot be aligned on the LAC curve at its minimum point. So, the purchase price is AR similar LAC bigger LMC identical MR.

Examples of firms in each market structure

The flawlessly competitive firms are likely to be food markets those selling need goods such as tissue, breads, drinks and more. This grocery store could be like Carrefour, Tesco and Giant.

As for monopolistic competition organizations, the best example should come from retail trade, including restaurants, clothing stores, and convenience stores. Retail store such as Al-ikhsan is one of the instances. This store provides different of the merchandise but they aren't similar such as Nike and Adidas. Coca cola and Pepsi also are the examples of monopolistic competition since they are close substitutes.


In realization, perfect competition and monopolistic competition have their own advantages and disadvantages. Usually people will choose monopolistic industry somewhat competitive one since it is much reduced competition compare to correctly competition.


Perfect competition. (1995). In Dictionary of Economics, Wiley. Offered by: http://www. credoreference. com/entry/wileyecon/perfect_competition (Accessed: 4th March 2012)

Perfect competition. Offered by: file:///E:/Introduction%20to%20Economics/Amos

WEB%20is%20Economics%20%20Encyclonomic%20WEB%20pedia. htm (Accessed: 14th Apr 2012)

Monopolistic competition: Available at: data file:///E:/Introduction%20to%20Economics

/AmosWEB%20is%20Economics%20%20Encyclonomic%20WEB%20pedia. htm

Monopolistic competition. (2003). In The New Penguin Business Dictionary. Offered by http://www. credoreference. com/entry/penguinbus/monopolistic_compe

tition ( Accessed: 3rd March 2012)

Similarities and Dissimilarities between Monopoly Competition and Perfect Competition Research Help, Tutoring (2009) Available at: file:///E:/Introduction%20to%20Economics/Similarities%20%20%20Dissimilarities%20%20%20Monopoly%20Competition%20%20%20Perfect%20Competition%20%20%20Assignment%20Help%20%20%20Homework%20Help%20%20%20Online%20Tutoring. htm. ( Seen 11th April)

Taylor John, B. Frost, L. (2006) Micro economics. 3thedn. United Kingdom and Australia: Stanford University and Monash College or university.

Question 2

Explain the main characteristics of a free market economy. Sometimes, government fixes or control buttons the costs of certain goods and services. Explain what's supposed by price control and discuss the advantages and negatives of such actions. The effects of both roof price and floor price should be discussed.

The principal characteristics of a free a market economy

A free market overall economy is a kind of economic system where control by demand and offer, rather than treatment from the government. A true free market market is a kind of economy that folks owned or operated all resources. The allocation of those resources is made by individuals alternatively than federal. The designer gets the opportunity to decide what to produce, how many to produce, what is the purchase price to fee consumers for those goods, and how much to pay to personnel. These decisions are usually damaged by the demand, supply and competitors.

Free market overall economy can also call as free organization overall economy which also know as the role of a limited administration. A competitive free market market provides the use of resources proficiently. It really is a self-doing current economic climate. Capital and natural resources like structures and equipment are free hold which does not belong to government. The products that services stated in the market are owned or operated privately.

Price control

Price controls can be explained as the prices that limited by government on the prices that will be charge for the merchandise and goods in the market. A couple of two major types of price control, that happen to be a price ceiling, the maximum price that may be priced to consumers and a cost floor, the bare minimum price that may be incurred to consumers

C:\Users\Lam Sheng Xiong\Desktop\max-price. jpg

Sources: www. economicshelp. org

The diagram above shows the maximum price which is price ceiling.

C:\Users\Lam Sheng Xiong\Desktop\min-price. jpg

Sources: www. economicshelp. org

The diagram above shows minimum price which is floor price.

Advantages and Disadvantages of Price Control

Firstly, the practice of price control should be achieved by all country to lessen the pressure of consumers. The good thing about utilizing such price settings is to maintain affordability of consumers for foods and goods, to avoid price rising immensely during shortages of resources, also to reduce the speed of inflation.

As for drawbacks of price control that may cause low supply of products. There will also be a scarcity where unlimited wants but limited resources that may then lead to demand will go over supply. This might causes long ready lists and cases of black markets likely to be took place because people make an effort to overcome the shortage of the resources. For example, during the Second World War, price of goods was fixed. However, people should sell the goods with inflated prices on the dark-colored market.

The effects of both roof price and floor price

For case, price ceilings help prevent suppliers from charging enormously high charges for limited goods or services easily because they can do this. Price ceilings are also helps those people that are poor by ensuring the price of living is affordable for them during tough economy. Inflation explains the increases of prices for goods and services little by little as time passes. During recession cycles which also called high inflation, prices increase faster than pay which lead to decease of the purchasing electricity. So, doing price ceilings is essential for consumers as they need to maintain their standard of living.

Price ceilings can bring negative influences to industry also. Suppliers are not thinking about producing more of goods when they can not earn more revenue by setting up their own prices, therefore, supply of resources will decreases, thus reduced the availability of products to the marketplace. Price ceilings also decrease the quality of products that can be produced, as suppliers have a problem in financial to reinvest in their business.

Floor price is useful for the federal government as they can use it to prevent people from buying harmful goods such as alcoholic beverages and cigarettes. They can have control on the marketplace and set a price on that that must definitely be sold at the purchase price or above from it. The consequence of achieving this is then suppliers are compelled to raise their prices up and cause the quantity demanded from the consumers to be lowers. The floor price must be establish above the marketplace only then it will be effective.

Sometimes a false market can be formed where the seller sell their proficient at the original market price. They shouldn't to do that because that is illegal, only company with authorization from governments can do this. For example, in britain nowadays it's very common to find small dealers that transfer large shares of alcohols or smoking cigarettes illegally and then sell to consumers at a cheaper price of smoking cigarettes and it much cheaper that in shops.

For suppliers, there aren't many advantages. They cannot set the price anymore or with regards to the elasticity of the nice as their earnings will commonly decrease. Also, they will often facing problem of surplus of supply at higher price.

For consumers it is all bad. You will find no good advantages; however, if for example a floor price was applied to Smoking, people will smoke cigarettes less because the smokes are very costly. Lesser third get-togethers will get influenced negatively by carbon monoxide smoke especially children and for that reason negative externalities can be prevented.


Price control may bring a lot benefits to consumers as well as troubles. So the administration will have the largest responsibility to regulate the purchase price to ensure that everything is going smoothly and consequently.

More than 7 000 students trust us to do their work
90% of customers place more than 5 orders with us
Special price $5 /page
Check the price
for your assignment