Posted at 11.21.2018
Keywords: bowling for columbine analysis essay
Throughout Bowling For Columbine an anti-political, critical and persuasive perspective is dominant. Bowling For Columbine is a documentary directed, written, produced and narrated by the controversial Michael Moore. The 2002 film aims to open the eyes of Americans and folks worldwide to gun control. The movie is based on the shooting massacre that occurred at Columbine High School, where two students Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold entered their Alma Mater and killed 15 people, also injuring yet another 21 students. The film investigates gun control in the USA and the lack of law and regulation on gun ownership.
People have various controversial views on the movie 'Bowling For Columbine ', especially associated with how a lot of Moore 's film is supported by facts. This post provides an unambiguous view on gun violence in the USA, whilst also seeking to reveal the truth behind the movie and about the persuasive power of documentary. The film positions the audience through the use of convincing ways to accept the 'truth ' established in the film, although these issues are incredibly real in america. 'Bowling For Columbine ' explores various exaggerated representations of the American populous, whilst also bestowing on the audience that there are issues with guns and their second amendment. The filmmaker is superficial along with his questions that are pointed, the utilization of witty, dry and mocking remarks are being used in his favour to lighten the actual fact that this 's a movie about people shooting others.
From the word go, Moore cause on his routine prejudice pathway. This included Moore opening a new account at North Country Bank that offers him a gun, whilst asking sarcastic questions like 'Do you think it 's a little dangerous offering guns at a bank? ' rather than letting the workers give a response. Moore uses such techniques to mock the staff, which helps him achieve his purpose, inadequately proving the 'truth ' over the evidence.
In addition to Moore 's scornful interrogations, he uses music to portray a certain light in the film. A really touching and upsetting portion of the documentary is the montage with 'What an excellent World ' played over the top flashes are shown of America 's decisions before associated with war and foreign involvement. The use of Louis Armstrong 's song is ridiculing the American government, making a suggestion how it isn 't a 'wonderful world ', in fact the opposite. The flashing by of the clips of individuals dying, being shot and interracial foreigners carrying American built guns aesthetically provides feeling of a mismanaged government. Moore does this to carefully turn his audience from the political leaders to his personal views through making the audience distraught.
Furthermore throughout the film it continues on making the audience feel further troubled. That is experienced in the scene when the 911 calls overlay the slow motion video footage walking through the corridors of Columbine SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL. Which is intended to position the audience as an initial hand student and gives a distressed feeling due to the audience feeling remorse for these dying students. Then it cuts to video footage from the cafeteria on April 20, 1999, watching shots fired, students hiding scared under the lunch tables, bombs exploding, fires starting and students running to get out. This major scene, influences the audience to feel upset and the tone provides scared feeling, which reinforces the issue of gun control.
Following the scene vividly re-living the Columbine High shootings, Moore switches to the then NRA president, Charlton Heston, as he screams his famous five word line 'From my cold dead hands ' (Heston, 2002) and waves a gun above his check out a roaring crowd. A voiceover is played which explains how just ten days following the massacre, the NRA held a pro-gun rally in Denver despite the pleas of the community in mourning. Moore pushes this negative representation of the NRA when in fact Heston didn 't scream his five words on this occasion; it actually was twelve months later in Charlotte (refer to picture within the column). Also the 'NRA meeting after the flint shootings ' occurred 8 months later. Moore uses his capacity to portray Heston as a villain, through using illusion of reality to converting the audience 's perspective.
Throughout the first hour, Moore uses an aggressive stance and reasons why America has a high rate of gun related violence, but to meet his intention he contests with a counterexample and provides a description. To start off he states the overwhelming number of guns must be the reason, and then subsequently he states that Canada has a comparable ratio of guns, but only one third of the homicides. Moore also discusses Europe compared to America 's violent history.
During the closing scene of 'Columbine ' Moore is filmed going to Hollywood to interview and ridicule the NRA president Charlton Heston. At first when requesting the interview Moore appears as a keen and eager fan, then criticizes Heston. During the interview Heston repeatedly pauses and doesn 't react to the question asked, Moore uses these as an advantage to silence his thoughts and opinions and asks relentless and rude remarks. Moore is a coward when planning on taking benefit of Heston who was simply in the early stages of Alzheimer 's Disease (A brain disease resulting in a decrease in mental power). In the end, Heston quickly leaves after waking up and announcing that the interview has ended. Moore uses this illusion of reality, portraying the negative NRA stance in to the final scene making the audience reflect.
After the ultimate scene, Moore uses additional voiceovers providing additional bias. The documentary targets Americans and teenagers throughout the world, especially those who don 't have a clear understanding of why there may be a whole lot gun violence. Throughout the film there are bursts of music and loud grasping sounds that are being used to seize the audiences attention. Moore uses a series of cleverly edited together loud and shocking clips, that happen to be a combination of visual and auditory footage. That is designed to keep the attention and confuse the audience. Shocking and explosive newsflashes, strange circumstances, frustrated interviewees, sardonic twists, and animations all joined together into an hour and fifty-seven minutes, the movie is best referred to as a documentary for the new generation. Furthermore Moore uses analytical features and prejudicial techniques, which position the audience to accept his viewpoint within the NRA or Charlton Heston. Moore has been ridiculed for editing to suit his aim, which isn 't following a documentary genre.
Moore correspondingly marginalises to match his aim. Inside the film, it is targeted on an anti-gun stance, but there isn 't time for pro gun enthusiasts to voice their opinion. Moore repetitively edits out responses to his questions so that it doesn 't affect the mind-set he wants his viewers to feel, also mocking people through his voiceovers. Although his techniques are arguable, the issues of which he discusses are of significance. Gun loving is as American as creating a pie on thanksgiving, although he shows more opinions antigun related, he doesn 't make opinions up for his viewers, he used rhetorical questions which allow audience think about what they may be watching. 'Columbine' is a well-organised documentary, which helps raise issues in a political manipulated society, and in the end it lets viewers think, which a lot of present day movies lack.
Do you believe that Moore depicts the American culture correctly? An organization of folks living and breathing in fear? Does one suppose that he's telling the truth? On first viewing the movie I believed Moore, did you?