PLAGIARISM FREE WRITING SERVICE
We accept
MONEY BACK GUARANTEE
100%
QUALITY

Assessing The Difference Between Crime And Defiance Criminology Essay

Crime and Deviance, is a major topic which influences mostly every modern culture nowadays. When determining crime and deviance, it'll count of the norms and ideals of a society. Many societies have many different prices and norms. Norms of society, is where all society members are anticipated to conform to certain behaviours. Prices of a contemporary society, is where a society values something all society associates conform to. For example, many societies value certain types of religious beliefs such as Christianity or Buddhism and a great many other types of religion.

Crime in society, is usually very specific, it goes against the laws of contemporary society. People who commit crimes, are breaking regulations and if found, must be punished. People can be punished for committing crimes such as burglary, damage to people's property, murder and assault. Individuals who are found guilty of committing crimes, must be punished by the courts of laws.

Crime is a member of family concept. This means that how a modern culture views criminal functions, can differ. Unlawful acts in a single society, might not be seen as a legal work in another culture. Society may also vary in how to punish people for committing specific criminal acts. (Broom and Selznick, 1963 p 540, 541).

When taking a look at crime in contemporary society, it is important to look at the physiological and emotional approaches with regards to crime. These strategies have been criticised. Taking a look at the physiological strategy, a biological theory was carried out by Cesare Lombroso. Cesare Lombroso, tried to find out if there was a connection between crime and biological triggers. In 1876, Cesare Lombroso completed research called "L'Uomo Delinquente".

Cesare Lombroso (1835 - 1909), developed the advice that criminals could be discovered using certain physical characterisitics such as large jaws, low foreheads and unnecessary body head of hair. Cesare Lombroso's work was dismissed, because the theory was only focused on the criminals, in jail. This theory didn't take into account, why a lot of people who have similar human characteristics, are found across the world. The theory, failed to describe how certain physical individuals features distinguish criminals from people who do not commit legal activities. (Macionis and Plummer, 1998. P207)

The psychological approach suggests that legal behavior, could be described due to the individual's mental make up and operations such as personality, rather than the person's physical characteristics. Hans Eysenck, carried out research in "Crime and personality" in 1964.

Hans Eysenck, recommended that it was possible that certain personality traits that individuals have can make certain people "resistant to discipline than others". (Stephenson, 1992. Web page 7). Hans Eysenck also recommended that people with certain personality characteristics would be more likely to commit unlawful behaviours. (Stephenson, 1992. Site 7).

Overall, using the physiological and emotional procedure has been criticised as it does not take into account some factors such as "exploring how conceptions of right and incorrect initially go up, ". (Macionis and Plummer, 1998. P208).

Deviance can be defined as behaviour which will not conform to certain norms of a specific society. (Haralambos & Holborn, 2008). Deviance can be discussed as a more broader term than crime. It isn't specific and deviant behavior may not be legal.

Deviant behavior can be positive and the behavior can be rewarded. An example of positive deviant behavior can be troops fighting for their country. They may be rewarded for his or her bravery and courage. Deviant behaviour can also be negative. A good example of negative deviant behaviour can include people who commit murder. This might not in favor of the society's value of the worthy of of every person and norms, resulting in severe punishment. Some deviant behavior may be tolerated in the current society. The behaviour is not punished or compensated, by society members. (Haralambos & Holborn, 2008 P. 321).

Many societies have accepted same intimacy relationships and households, which wouldn't normally have been accepted a long time ago. They are not rewarded or punished, they are really tolerated in the modern culture.

Laws of world can change, which does be based upon the norms and worth of society participants. As change can occur, crime and deviance can transform as well.

It is very hard to provide full description of deviance, as there is no complete way. It is a broad section of research. Behaviour which was viewed as undesirable and deviant, may be accepted in today's society or in the foreseeable future. For example, in a few cultures before it was considered deviant for girls to smoke and also to wear constitute in public areas. Nowadays, women have significantly more liberty to wear constitute or even to smoke in public places. Another example is homosexuality. Before 1969, it was illegal for men to acquire homosexual relations. As the laws altered in 1969, it was made legal that men over the age of twenty one might well have homosexual relations. (Haralambos & Holborn, 2008. P322). The famous writer, Oscar Wilde was imprisoned for having an unlawful romantic relationship with Lord Alfred Douglas before the 1967 Sexual Offenses Work was transferred. (Johnston, 2002. )

"Deviance is culturally determined"(Haralambos & Holborn, 2008. P322). Which means that deviant behaviour can change anticipated to different civilizations or some societies may accept certain types of behaviours, whereas other societies could find the behaviour undesirable. (Haralambos & Holborn, 2008 p 322).

The functionalist theory with regards to this issue crime and deviance is functionalists see modern culture as a whole, by using a macro level strategy. Functionalists concentrate on more on the sources of deviance in modern culture, not how people commit deviant behaviour in a modern culture. Functionalists claim that crime and deviance provides a a positive function in society. People may feel within a community and more part of any society. An example of this is when the Dunblane Tragedy occurred. This affected many people, which created more of a closeness in modern culture. Emile Durkheim suggested that a certain level of crime and deviance is necessary, in order for a society to operate. The crime and deviance levels could become dysfunctional if crime rates increase. This can create a contemporary society whose sociable order is disrupted, which can create social chaos. If crime rates decrease, stagnation might occur where the world may not function properly. Robert Merton (1968) shows that anomie, where people feel normlessness in a society, could happen if a society will not function properly. Emile Durkheim also suggested that some members of society, may rebel against society's norms and worth. Some individuals may have different views on the norms and worth of society.

Functionalists also suggest the crime can produce occupation for individuals in modern culture. Functionalists suggest that without criminals, many people in the police force, prison individuals, court workers wouldn't normally have employment.

An exemplory case of a Functionalist theory on Crime and Deviance is Emile Durkheim's research of suicide(1897). Durkheim mainly centered on suicide rates to see if there is any communal conditions that could impact or discourage folks from committing suicide.

Emile Durkheim noticed that suicide rates seemed to grow more during durations of politics hardship during 1848, around different Europe. Emile Durkheim accepted that suicide rates might be related to public stability and integration of contemporary society. Making use of this theory, Emile Durkheim used another type of group of data, mainly from Europe. Watching the suicide rates in several European countries he pointed out that these were comparably variations but began to note a style. Most countries who applied Protestant as their faith had the best suicide rates than countries who mainly used Catholic as their religious beliefs. Main protestant countries possessed one hundred and ninety suicides per million people. These statistics were in comparison to blended protestant and catholic faith countries who possessed ninety six suicides per million people. Main catholic countries had fifty eight suicides per million people. Emile Durkheim started to ponder if there is a link between suicide and religious beliefs. Durkheim tried to look at other factors such as monetary and cultural distinctions. After looking at the suicide rates of Bavaria in Germany where mainly catholic people remained there was a minimal amount of suicides. Emile Durkheim then looked at the suicide rates of Prussia where mainly people possessed a protestant beliefs. He known that Prussia experienced an increased suicide rate than Bavaria. Emile Durkheim then figured religion relates to suicide. By using this theory and the information he accumulated before, he figured suicide can be scheduled to "Anomie". This implies when a society is normlessness, where there is insufficient social steadiness and integration. During political hardship, people may feel not really a part of culture and feel suicide is the only path out. Durkheim figured there exists low suicide rates in Catholic countries because there was more sociable control and stableness that the religious beliefs brings than the protestant countries. Durkheim concludes that interpersonal stableness and integration functions as a protection for individuals in society from insecurity and suicide.

To measure the Functionalist perspective on crime and deviance, is usually that the functionalist theory offers a macro level way. It looks at the larger picture, presenting more understanding into what sort of society structures associated with crime and deviance. It gives a better issue, regarding how the biological theory relates to crime. Anomie, defined in Robert Merton's theory (1968) offers more in depth sociological thinking, into today's modern culture.

However, Emile Durkheim was criticised for using figures that was unreliable in his analysis of suicide(1897). Durkheim's figures, were only found in Europe. No other country's reports was used, therefore the theory can't be related to other countries. The statistics didn't disclose the circumstances of how the people devoted suicide. Many deaths, were not ruled out as mishaps or murder.

As the functionalist point of view only looks at the macro level methodology, it generally does not include how people are damaged by crime, individually. Functionalists assume that crime, can bond areas together in population. Victims of criminal offenses, may withdraw from world or move away from contemporary society. The functionalist strategy, does not take into account individual distinctions in modern culture. Functionalists also suggests that criminal offenses and deviance to a certain extent, favorably benefits everyone in contemporary society.

Marxists targets the capitalist system, but Marxists criticize that only many people in a certain group have only advantages. Other organizations can be disadvantaged. The functionalist methodology does not consider, that world may have different categories. The functionalist theory mainly focuses on that society, as you big group.

Feminists suggest that some ideas, conducted with malestream views will not be able to recognize the bond between criminal offense and gender. Feminists can start to identify lots of issues between women and criminal offenses. Feminists such as Otto Pollak, the "masked" feminine offender, suggests that official statistics in relation to gender and criminal offenses, can be misleading. It is because nearly all police officers, courtroom judges are male orientated. Women tend to be more leniently charged with crimes, compared to men because of their role in contemporary society.

Some feminists suggest the court docket regulations can be biased against women. A lot of men may be more bias, because of what sort of women can break traditional functions in world.

Feminists such as Freda Adler(1975) suggests that because women have more freedom in society, this can cause a rise in how women can commit offences. She shows that this does not include the natural theory, that changes in society can change just how women behave.

Pat Carlen(1988) suggests that because women have more freedom in population, that they don't have the chance to commit crimes. Carlen suggests that women can become more supervised by males, throughout their lives. Women, who will often have the original role of cleaning, house making, childcare tasks will have less possibility to commit offences than men.

An exemplory case of a Feminist theory, associated with offense and deviance is the analysis of Delinquent Girls(1981) by Anne Campbell. Anne Campbell completed a study called " delinquent young girls" in 1981. Anne Campbell recommended that more woman's behavior was becoming increasingly delinquent and in some cases, violent. Although, she argued that the changes in women's role in world, the women's movement was not a direct cause.

Using most important research, Anne Campbell advised that more young women were less susceptible to expressing their anger and hostility. They would much more likely to keep it to themselves.

Anne Campbell then suggested that a quantity of social and monetary reasons was the reason why so a lot of women have equal protection under the law in world. More women's flexibility in contraception and job performed give women more freedom in modern culture. Anne Campbell recommended that this brings about " a reduction in sex-role disparity and a far more active roles for women in every activities-some of which many be delinquent. " Anne Campbell, 1981

Anne Campbell noticed that most of the female offenders, didn't think that they had any freedom in their society. They opposed to being self-employed and job orientated, so that they had no women's independence in society( liberation).

Anne Campbell then suggested that the surge in female delinquency, was due to the police attitudes towards young women and how the judicial systems perceives ladies in a world. She also looked at how women can be easily viewed by members of the public, fighting in public areas areas which demonstrated a rise.

As a bottom line, Anne Campbell concluded that the impact of independence of women in society could not be directly related to offences which women commit.

To evaluate, that the feminist theory has brought up more knowing of women in society. Changes in regulations, where women have more equal rights. Crimes which mainly are afflicted by women such as rape or home abuse is handled more very seriously with the police authorities. In world, women have more of a say in today's society. New laws and regulations such as the Equal Pay Function and the Sex Discrimination Act gives women more of a tone in today's modern culture. It recognizes more of an gender inequality, in offense and deviance.

The feminist theory can concentrate too much on gender. Factors such as class and ethnicity are not included. Feminist studies such as Delinquent Girls(1981) by Anne Campbell more stresses on gender, Anne Campbell didn't include school or ethnicity into the studies. Anne Campbell also used a little number of folks which was suggested, did not signify other women in society.

The feminist theory, also does not include the dissimilarities of women. They believe that women have the same circumstances or characteristics in world, they do not look at individual differences. A good example is the analysis of Delinquent Females, where Anne Campbell didn't individualize the people in the analysis.

The Marxist procedure is a discord approach, which does not agree with the functionalist procedure. Sociologists suggest that people who own production, have more electric power than the people in the ruling school(the working school). Marxists suggest there is a discord in the capitalist system between the capitalists and the ruling school. Marxists also suggest that the laws manufactured in culture, protect the capitalists which gives them more cultural control in world. William Chambliss (1976) shows that some laws aren't needed in culture. He recommended that property, made the most income and the individuals who owns the house, would become resources of economy. He shows that laws are made, to protect the interest of the capitalists. Marxists also suggest that crime is mainly seen as a problem, largely in the working course. The ruling class(capitalists), are more likely to get away with crime, than the working category. The Capitalists have significantly more influence in world, so they are most unlikely to get in trouble for crime.

A Marxist point of view study was completed by Laureen Snider in The Politics of Corporate Crime(1993) implies areas that have capitalism are most unlikely to introduce regulations, which might not catch the attention of businesses. Capitalist claims, use big money to purchase business. They are really unlikely, to introduce lawful restrictions which may discourage business.

Laureen Snider also shows that the majority of the serious crimes are corporate offences, dedicated in modern industrial countries. Laureen Snider, suggests that Corporate crime is a lot more serious than street criminal offense such as drugs. It is because additional money is spent and more people are wiped out in corporate criminal offenses than street crime. For instance, Laureen Snider shows that an estimation of 20, 000 people are wiped out because these were murdered. Laureen Snider then shows that 14, 000 people lost their lives scheduled to industrial incidents, 30, 000 people died from using consumer products that happen to be usually illegitimate and unsafe to work with. 100, 000 folks have died credited to working conditions leading to disease. Snider, suggests that corporate criminal offense costs more people's lives than avenue crime.

Snider also shows that, people who commit commercial crime will often have lenient fines or charges. There are extremely few corporate offense cases, which check out legal judge.

To evaluate, the Marxist perspective identifies that the Capitalists can be engaged in crime, not just the ruling category using sociological studies such as The Politics of Corporate Crime(1993). Corporate offences make a difference people in society, not just street crimes. That is due to the statistics explored by Laureen Snider(1993). Shows the inequality, that the ruling category faces towards crime and deviance in world, because they do not have as much power, effect as the Capitalists. Laureen Snider, implies the theory that Capitalists are less inclined to enter courtroom proceedings for corporate criminal offense shows how powerful Capitalists can maintain society.

The Marxist procedure has been criticised for having a straightforward view about how electricity is divided between your capitalist societies. Some individuals claim that capitalist societies will not always have increased levels of crime. Stephen Jones(2001) suggests that Switzerland, is a capitalist world which offense rates remain low. Whereas the Marxist strategy mainly focuses on criminal offenses and deviance, it relates to the discord theory of the Capitalists and the ruling school.

More than 7 000 students trust us to do their work
90% of customers place more than 5 orders with us
Special price $5 /page
PLACE AN ORDER
Check the price
for your assignment
FREE