PLAGIARISM FREE WRITING SERVICE
We accept
MONEY BACK GUARANTEE
100%
QUALITY

Analysis Of My Lumber English Literature Essay

Edward Morgan Forster is a famous English writer and is well known for his novels "Howard's End" and "A Passing to India". He was also the writer of a reserve of criticism, some books, two biographies, as well as much essays and brief stories.

Forster was a Bloomsbury's Group member. That group contains philosophers, authors and designers who resided in London and supported the modernist movements at the beginning of the 20th century. E. M. Forster was born in London, but he lived in the countryside of Herforshire. While he was students of King's University, in Cambridge, he sensed a great interest to other cultures and that is why he traveled a lot afterwards. In 1912 he went to India where his observations and experiences offered him a lot of materials which he used nowadays writing his famous novel "A Passage to India" (1924). It is the reserve that he mentions about in the first paragraph of "My Lumber. " Forester's fiction works often identify the impact of cultural conventions on common human relationships.

The article "My Timber, " was released in 1926 and it is still encourages viewers to think about the substance of materialism and the seductive energy of individuals property.

The purpose of this article is to show the effects made by using property. Using wit and humor, the author talks about that obtaining land may not bring the easy pleasure people might expect.

"My Lumber", is a witty article describing Forster's judgment about the possession of a little property he bought with the royalties from his novel. He talks about the consequences the hardwood makes on him. Forster shows a humorously negative attitude to his experience of obtaining land using biblical allusions, the manipulation of phrases and term choice.

Biblical illusions are typically used to help emphasize his point. Within the essay "My Wood" there is a biblical allusion to a passage in Tag, "It really is easier for a camel to go through the eye of an needle, than for a abundant man to enter into the kingdom of God. " Another allusion is the line Happier Alexander. I think he means Alexander the Great who conquered a great deal of international lands to increase his empire.

So, the utilization of Biblical allusions supports Forster's opinion, and points out his frame of mind to possession a land. He points out what is likely obvious, but is not necessarily understood: that if you possess lots of things you can't move around a whole lot. He instructs that the furniture needs dusting, dusters need servants, servants need insurance, and each one of these make you think many times prior to deciding to have something. Yes, Forster plainly talks about that even if something may appear simple, a person should think several times before he decides to be employed in any effort. The frame of mind of the author is understandable; he is contemplating if the owning of the real wood will result in dire effects. Forster makes a final result, telling a person should think many times before he obligate himself to something. His ideas are forcing him to see and allow the negative influence of the timber on him.

Owning property can not be seen only as a good thing, and Forster mentions this using manipulation of sentences. He gives indirect meaning to some of his phrases, for example: "My lumber makes me feel heavy. " Forster gives the sentence a variation in the meaning, and the reader should comprehend what he's insinuating.

On my estimation, the target audience is all grown-up population. This article is not for children for sure, because they're unable to understand the complete deep meaning of it. Mature people, who have read Bible and lots of other catalogs already, know record and are rather well-educated, have the ability to understand and value ideas of the author.

In order to attain his audience, Foster makes a lot of examples, explains to about his personal experience with running a land. His point of view is well indicated and argued. All samples that he found in the essay are understandable. For instance, in his speak about the parrot in the 4th paragraph he mentions that because someone owns a property, it doesn't imply that he owns totally everything on this property. Also the author says that owning property makes people greedy and they start wanting increasingly more, until they achieve the unachievable. Also one of the influences is that who owns property needs to make show off of his property. Property makes person so selfish in getting that he can't gain anyone else but himself.

And if to look thought the 2nd paragraph we see that the property produces men of weight. And the writer mentions that the man of weight is the main one who didn't have the ability to get into the Kingdom of Heaven. So, the men of weight show the men of self-importance. So, a lot more property someone has, the more important he considers himself. The man of weight can't move like the lightning from the East to West, by classification. And Foster agrees that his real wood makes him feel heavy.

So, all biblical allusions, expression alternatives, manipulations of sentences, samples and facts make the Foster's article interesting and also have a big impact on visitors. Sometimes his terminology is too complicated, not understandable, but this is one of the things that make this essay unique, that allures reader. He runs on the lot of metaphors and that's the reason his style of writing makes readers to believe a lot, utilizing their imagination. The topic that is defined in "The Solid wood" is fairly simple and understandable, but the way it is presented makes people enjoy reading the essay.

More than 7 000 students trust us to do their work
90% of customers place more than 5 orders with us
Special price $5 /page
PLACE AN ORDER
Check the price
for your assignment
FREE