Posted at 10.01.2018
"Theology is the improvement of exploration and thinking that leads to the interpretation of doctrines. Theology is improvement rather than result. The effect is doctrine. " Good theology draws upon lots of sources. There has been significant debate within the Religious belief with reference to the identity of the options, also their comparative importance for theological examination. Generally speaking, important sources have been accepted within Religious theology: Scripture, reason, traditions, experience and creation. Each one of these sources has a definite role to make good theology. Also another important main source of Christian theology is Jesus Christ. I'll discuss how "Immanuel and the Purpose of Creation" uses these resources, and whether this is good theology.
The first major way to obtain theology is Scripture. Scripture is regarded as authoritative for Christian theology. Most Christians buy into the authority of Scripture, because this is a foundational Christian theology. Also God comes to us through Scripture. It is the base and norm for any Religious preaching and coaching. In Wilkins, the writer mentions New Testament recommendations of Immanuel (14 evidences in the brand new Testament). However, there's a only 1 the Old Testament Scripture talked about (Proverbs 8:30-31). The "Immanuel" in the article means, "God with us" (Matt 1: 28). There are several recommendations in the Old Testament not mentioned in this article regarding this concept: Isaiah 63:11, Micah 3:8; Haggai 2:5 mention that God's Nature dwells within his people. And also in the reserve of Judges, there are numerous Judges who "live with God. " The Old Testament is a planning for "God around" in the arriving of Christ. The writer does not mention any of this, but only mentions the 'Incarnation' Jesus.
The second major way to obtain theology is reason. This assumed a fantastic importance, and the significance of reason for Christian theology has always been recognized. In the article, there are several theologians' ideas: Thomas Aquinas; John Calvin; Jim Packer; Duns Scotus; Colin Gunton. But the challenge is that they have different views of the Incarnation. Thomas Aquinas says, "There was no reason behind Christ's getting into the planet except to save sinners. " But John Calvin says, "Despite the fact that there have been no need of his interposition to redeem the human race, would still have become man. " It appears to face two options: either Jesus becomes incarnate for sinner, or Jesus becomes incarnate for his people regardless of what the reason. It creates it complicated and difficult to understand. Relating to Olson's thinking, reason is logic, the guideline of non-contradiction. However, this content seems to disregard this.
The third major source is tradition. Tradition is the consensual belief of the Chapel that began to be developed in the second and third decades. Theology is situated after Scripture, and tradition refers to a traditional way of interpreting Scripture. The article only rates Catholic and Protestant theology to comment on Calvin who was simply a well-known Reformer. The author does not reveal enough voices of the Christian community. Custom is the consensus of Christian faith in common belief. We need to access it as the tone of voice of the Religious community to understand tradition. If we follow the specialist of any one theologian or part of the Christian community blindly, this is not a good model of tradition.
The fourth major way to obtain theology is experience. Experience is the individuals experience, not personal experience, specially the spiritual experience in the Christian community. Experience is the most unpleasant and unclear source. Nevertheless, experience must give a foundational source for Christian theology, and Religious theology provides an interpretive format within human experience. The writer mentions "ecofeminism. " Ecofeminism is a social and political motion somewhere between environmentalism and feminism. However, this isn't the full human experience but only that one particular experience. Furthermore it isn't spiritual experience.
The fifth major source of theology is creation. Creation is the fact that work of the triune God. This article suggests that the Incarnation was God's goal for creation to become listed on it in his son, and the Incarnation God is directly mixed up in sufferings of his creation. However, Karl Barth says "This becoming cannot be brought into connection with creation. It cannot be regarded as one of its evolutionary possibilities God's Word learning to be a creature must be regarded as a new creation it is just a sovereign divine act, and it is an act of lordship not the same as creation. " Hence, God and Jesus aren't prisoners, however they are redeemers. The author expresses the Incarnation only as the pain of Creation. Jesus is not just a creature. however, Jesus is also the Originator. This article, therefore, underestimates Jesus the Inventor in the Incarnation.
Lastly, good theology is centred on Jesus Christ. Jesus says "I am just how, the truth, and the life. No one involves the daddy except through me" (John 14:6). There is no way to know God except through Jesus Christ, when there is ways to know God except through Jesus Christ, this is not the reality. Our purpose to review theology is to know the way, the truth and the life span of Jesus. Jesus Christ is the lens to see God. Wilkins says "Christ is the conclusion of all God's revelation in the past. " This short article mentions Paul's declaration "there is certainly but one Lord, Jesus Christ, through whom all things came and through whom we live" (1Cor 8:6). Wilkins reveals the value of the immense basis of the linking of Christ and creation. From this viewpoint, this information embraces good theological point.
In conclusion, Olson says "A Christian theology is one that occurs out of Scripture and tips to Jesus Christ, is normally constant with the consensual traditions of Religious thought, and it is logically coherent with other Christian beliefs and illumines the shared experience of Christians. " Good theology is affordable. It also talks from a biblical understanding of God, Individual, and the Creation. Good theology is not set to an individual Christian perception. Good theology will not break a balance, it talks effectively to all. In addition, good theology explains to every portion of human experience. It includes economics, science, idea, politics, history, and so forth. Primarily, Jesus is the primary figure and hero in good theology. This informative article does not show us a good balance among these sources well, and also it is challenging to understand. Nevertheless, this article is centred in Jesus Christ as main persona and hero. Hence, this informative article holds enough certification to be called good theology.