PLAGIARISM FREE WRITING SERVICE
We accept
MONEY BACK GUARANTEE
100%
QUALITY

Analysing Britains Role In EUROPE Politics Essay

It was only on January 1, 1973 that Britain became an official member of the European Union. Ultimately, that which was seen through this was twenty-two years of little participation from Britain in the affairs of Europe. Twenty-two years before its entrance, Britain was given the chance in 1950 to participate in the discussions that paved the road for the emergence of the Western Coal and Steel Community; nevertheless, when an invitation was prolonged to the Labour Federal of that time period, Best Minister Clement Attlee declined to participate in these conversations. Later, when the ECSC and its own six member-states passed consensus to expand the ECSC, Britain was invited to the negotiations but Leading Minister Anthony Eden in the end withdrew his Conservative get together from the discussions. By 1974, a year after its public membership, Britain had become regarded as an awkward partner to europe, a standing that continues to be seen between Britain and the EU as a result of the regulations that Britain's particular leaders took towards europe.

Conservative Government - Strained Relations of 1973 & 1974

Edward Heath, who needed the reins of Britain in 1970, was at the helm of creating a stronger relationship with the European Union. His pro-European attitude led to the best admittance of Britain into the EU. Nevertheless, admission came at the same time when Britain and the others of Europe began to see a strain to their economies. The success that the EEC got seen prior to Britain's entrance was not shared; instead, Britain got into during a amount of tough economy which led its membership never to have positive connotations with Britons. While Edward Heath and Georges Pompidou possessed started to create a close marriage after Britain's access, Britain's attempt at increasing the quality and size EEC's organizations and proposing the concentration of its activities in Brussels angered the Fee because, through it, Britain persisted to imply the Commission was ineffective.

When it came to the Economic and Monetary Union, Britain once more earned a trustworthiness of being an uncomfortable spouse in the European union. Britain disappointed its EU partners when it announced that it would not enter into the sterling into the joint float unless certain agreements were come to by the EEC to underwrite the sterling's value. As the remaining member-states had agreed to place the bank in Luxemburg, Heath insulted the EU by pressing for centralization of the Western reserve loan provider to be found in Brussels, which fared adversely for him because of this of member-states thinking that Britain was meddling in issues that they have no involvement in.

As Britain prolonged to slowly combine into the EU, the British government continued to strain its romantic relationship with the other EEC members. Instead of behaving in a diplomatic manner, United kingdom representatives openly voiced their opinions of the incompetence seen within the EEC, which often angered the original six. Heath's thrust for what he thought were necessary changes to the exterior energy plan of the EU was often seen as conflicting with the positions of the other member states; France had extended to insist an internal policy would have to be first set up before the EU could even consider the feasibility of the external plan. The United kingdom, on the other hand, did not think that internal energy coverage was as critical as the EU's external policy on the problem. Unfortunately, the start of the Arab-Israeli warfare brought about oil shortages that brought many EU countries right down to their knees; the Dutch and the Germans, who initially supported Britain's discussion in preventing an interior policy, began suffering seriously from the shortages in olive oil and shortly after began helping the creation of an interior European engine oil/energy policy. Within a show of their awkward partnership, Britain decided that not back down from other original position of rejecting an interior energy insurance plan for the EU, which led the continuing of European olive oil shortages. Britain focused on its own local pursuits, feared that the establishment of inside energy insurance plan would give the EU a chance of obtaining usage of Britain's olive oil reserves in the North Sea. Because of this, Heath would not concede to EU pressure and refused to consolidate and disperse energy resources evenly amongst European union member-states.

What started as a constructive and positive entry into the EU finished with discord and stress between Britain and the EU member-states. While Heath was truly interested in strengthening europe, his activities were viewed as Britain being uncooperative because of this of its wish to take advantage of the EU for the sake of its own countrywide passions. Regrettably, the Labour party that got office in 1974 would continue Britain's role as an awkward partner.

Labour Federal government of 1974-1979

The Labour party that been successful Heath's federal government in 1974 began to have a backseat in international politics as it attempted to repair the country. Domestically, Britain had become plagued with financial and political problems induced by both the oil crisis and by Heath's inability to control English trade unions (Guido, 1984). Due to the oil turmoil, inflation hit British isles society hard and was expected to remain on the rise, while the balance of repayments observed a deficit in the billions by the end of 1974. While Best Minister Harold Wilson possessed to work with hung Parliament, he also found himself, at exactly the same time, being forced to deal with the issues of his divided country.

Britain's account in the European union stayed an issue to numerous Britons, which allowed Wilson to unite Britain in a advertising campaign against the European Union (Bilski, 1977). Wilson, in discovering the negative judgment Britons possessed of the European union, decided to become a protector of Britain's national pursuits by pressing for United kingdom regular membership in the EU to be renegotiated with satisfactory terms. What started as peaceful discussions that targeted to adapt and reshape the terms of Britain's membership in the EU soon turned tough by Apr 1974; at the renegotiations performed in April, Britain demanded to have the to withdraw itself from the EU if any future negotiation resulted in terms that Britain wouldn't normally consent to (Ernst, 1974). While the Percentage was disappointed with Britain's shade, it felt obligated to sit down with Britain to renegotiate its terms of membership.

After Wilson firmly campaigned for his administration against the EU on Cover; cash rebates; and Britain's membership terms, domestic polls showed a higher percent of Britons reinforced EU membership. As the referendum produced high support for regular membership from the general public, Wilson continued to see hostility to the European union from within his own party. Therefore, Britain found itself again as an uncomfortable partner to the European union predicated on the discussions of pollution control and Britain's statements from the ERDF. When the EU proposed changes to emission restrictions, Britain quickly declined the proposal and claimed that the benchmarks were unsuitable for Britain. While the EU suspected that Britain was affected by its substance industry, West Germany argued that the lax specifications that British substance plants got gained by not recognizing the emission limitations would give United kingdom companies a price advantage over European competitors.

In carrying on the souring of its romantic relationship with the EU, Britain was accused of making says from the ERDF for assignments that were supposed to be funded by British cash. The ERDF was established with the mindset that only assignments that were not funded through nationwide money could be stated. Instead, Britain experienced decided to devote only claims that could allow it to recover the amount of money it experienced itself placed into the ERDF finance. To the European union, this make an effort at recovering its cash showcased Britain's inability to truly have a community-based mentality.

Finally, when it arrived time to look into energy coverage again, Britain once more took the steps to make it an awkward partner with the EU. Britain persisted to object the proposal of placing control buttons on the development and circulation of olive oil energy even though the EU attemptedto accommodate each and every demand by the British isles government. Nevertheless, Britain sustained to argue which it needed additional time to check out the effects of such proposal, which angered all the member-states who wished to obtain an accord on an overview of the insurance policy. In speaking about the upcoming seminar of 1975, Britain proved again showed its disinterest in cooperating with the EU when it announced that it would not consent to be displayed by an individual EC seat at the Paris convention. Annoyed, Germany sent out a notice to the member-states that indicated anger at having less community within the European union consequently of Britain's position on the seat allocation. Germany argued that using its weak market, Britain was in no position to discuss on these issues without any effects (Davidson, 1975). Members-states prolonged to claim that the bad attitude of the British isles government hindered their potential to develop the policy.

While the Wilson supervision tarnished Britain's reputation within the European union, the emergence of James Callaghan as another Prime Minister does little to make the EU hopeful of a better marriage with Britain. While Callaghan got a peaceful methodology towards the European union early on, home hostility towards Britain's account in the European union continued to stay high; which led Callaghan to remain mindful in his relationship with the EU. The notice from Callaghan to Labour Secretary Ron Hayward, while positive initially, extended Britain on its negative relations with the European union. Callaghan stated that the European union was not employed in the passions of Britain and that the only reason behind not withdrawing from the EU was that it would tarnish Britain's relations with america. Callaghan's statement in regards to the US angered member-states who complained that Britain was providing more attention to the United States than to its associates in the European union. A prominent theme in Callaghan's federal, US-British relations do little to lift up Britain's reputation within the EU, and its relations would continue steadily to spiral downward with the go up of the Thatcher federal government.

Rise of Thatcher: 1979 to 1990

Elected in 1979, the Thatcher federal that rose to power pursuing Callaghan's Labour government became quickly aligned to the U. S. federal, much to the anger of Britain's EU partners who were against impact stemming from the United States. Nevertheless, by 1981, the European Union was enduring an economical downturn and was facing individual bankruptcy. To be able to counter this problem, the EU proposed increasing the VAT ceiling by an additional one percent, which Britain firmly refused to simply accept. Relations between Britain and the European union continued to sour during this financial crisis because Britain prolonged to hold up any compromises and refused to acknowledge any proposals established by the European union. As the EU member-states grew annoyed with Britain's reservations on agreeing to new agricultural prices, member-states decided to call for a bulk vote on the purchase price levels. In retaliation, Britain protested this step, stating that it breached Britain's to start using a veto on this issue. Nevertheless, already weary with Britain's inability to compromise, member-states turned down Britain's complaint because they assumed that agricultural price levels weren't of nationwide interest for Britain. As a result of Britain's lack of cooperation, France suggested eliminating Britain as a member of the EU and so that it is a land with 'special status' in the EU (Hansard, 1982).

When the European union finally ran out of profit 1984, it proposed adding yet another budget of two billion to aid them for all of those other year. As normal, Britain became an uncomfortable partner by announcing that it would reject a supplementary budget, asserting that the European union should learn how to use with the budget it had been recently been given. Hearing this, member-states grew weary with the already unpopular United kingdom administration and labelled Thatcher as being 'counter-productive' to the success of the Union (The Economist, 1984). Member-states were disappointed with Britain's most important concern on the budget alternatively than on the wellbeing of the EU partnership.

Already blacklisted as a hardliner, Thatcher's strong assistance and recognition with the U. S. did little to help her image with the European union. The Reagan Administration, on a hunt for terrorists in Syria and Libya, was placed on placing limitations on both of these countries and urged Britain to join its cause. Britain's involvement in urging EU sanctions against Syria remaining many EU member-states troubled by Britain's strong partnership with the United States.

While the first 1980's saw a far more peaceful and tranquil time for the relationships between Britain and the EU, Britain did look again as an awkward partner by the end of the 1980's. When proposals for a single European money were advised at the 1988 getting together with in Hanover, Thatcher quickly responded that she'd not take any steps of integrating the sterling pound in to the EMS. On top of that, Thatcher rejected any ideas of fabricating a Western european central bank, stating a central standard bank would need a central government to succeed, to which she argued that her federal was not prepared to admit a centralized Western european government. Nevertheless, annoyed by Britain, the European union decided to move forward without the British and set up a committee to check out the possible ways to strengthen the EMS (Hansard, 1988). Worried at the route that the European union commenced taking, Thatcher publically denounced the committee and proclaimed that Britain could not consent to the establishment of the European Central Bank, a declaration which extended to strain relations between Britain and the European union (Ibid, 1988).

When speaking about a European scientific co-operation budget in 1986, Britain once more was labelled as the EU's uncomfortable spouse in its refusal to accept the quantity of funding proposed by the other member-states. The European union believed that it might be providing Britain more value for its investment in research and development; nevertheless, Britain would not budge from its original budget proposal (Peel off, 1987). Once Britain supported down and agreed to fund the program in 1987, member-states got become frustrated with the termination of this program consequently of lack of money from the United kingdom (Sharp, 1987).

When the European union expressed affinity for reviving the programs for the European Defence Community in 1987, Thatcher warned against the theory in dread that the establishment of such defence coverage would counter the links that the EU and Britain got established with the United States. These strong views from Thatcher made Britain seem to be uncooperative with the goals established by the European union. Although some member-states were also unwilling to establish an EDC, the shade that Thatcher used - which made her appear more worried about Britain's romance with america - made Britain an uncomfortable spouse for the European union. Her give attention to protecting ties with the United States rather than worrying about European passions greatly hindered her ability to work with her EU associates.

At home, Margaret Thatcher began facing problems from the Labour get together, who accused her of wanting to slow the development of europe (Separate, 1989). They argued that the EU would continue its development with or without Britain and this it would be dangerous for Britain to be still left as a 'second-class member' (Indie, 1989). The public was further enraged by Thatcher's tone against the EU; numbers in the united states showed that the general public had are more pro-Europe since the referendum in 1975 (Independent, 1989). Because of this, Thatcher saw herself being forced to become a lot more natural and conciliatory on the EU. While people of her case continued to harm the European union on monetary insurance policy, Thatcher made a decision to allow only the first condition of the Delors proposal for the creation of the economic union. Thus, throughout 1989 and 1990, the proposal for a financial union became an initial theme for both EU and Britain.

Due to the actual fact that Thatcher personally opposed Britain's regular membership in the ERM, federal officials quickly grew irritated with her stance and many eventually resigned from other posts. Officials argued that Thatcher's views weren't constant with the views of the English government which by remaining out of the ERM, Britain would be unable to take part in the discussions adjoining a monetary union. Having a authorities pressing for entrance in to the ERM, Thatcher eventually agreed that Britain would become a member of the ERM on October 5, 1990 (Elliott, 2005).

While Thatcher decided to type in the ERM, her collaboration with the EU once again became awkward when she refused to allow the EU to go to the next level of the Delors report. Much to the anger of Parliament and her pantry, Thatcher argued that national interests could not allow her to 'palm within the sterling' to the EU (Hansard, 1990). Due to her stubbornness, the European union found Britain as an uncomfortable spouse and Thatcher lost her Deputy PM, who resigned in annoyance. Her Deputy PM argued that the uncooperative tone that Thatcher had considered with the EU would make it more challenging for Britain to hold influence over the continuing future of the financial union. Additionally, he blamed Thatcher for the inflation that Britain was battling because of this of her disinterest in signing up for the ERM (Independent, 1990). The resignation of Geoffrey Howe slowly and gradually provided way to the end of Thatcher's reign as Prime Minister and surge to the government of John Major in November 1990, which hoped to make better relationships with europe.

Conservative Administration of 1990 to 1997

While the Major administration that needed over tried to mend relations between Britain and the European union, it constantly found itself going back for the hostile marriage found under the reign of Thatcher. In 1991, President Delors provided Britain an opportunity to acknowledge an 'opt-out' clause when it comes to accepting a single money. While Thatcher still argued against the idea of accepting any bargain on financial union, Major felt an 'opt-out' clause in the Maastricht Treaty would help Britain defeat its hesitation on the topic. Nevertheless, because only Britain was presented with this opt-out opportunity, it was again placed as an uncomfortable partner therefore of its unwillingness to totally cooperate with the union.

By 1992, Britain had assumed the EU Presidency and today found itself strongly on the defence of the Maastricht Treaty. Major assumed that position in complete support of ratification of the Treaty would show the European union that Britain was focused on its role within the EU. At exactly the same time, he thought that the treaty would hinder efforts at centralizing the EU. Nonetheless, Delors' interpretation of the Maastricht Treaty as an opportunity for the EU to become a federalist state annoyed both Britain and lots of the EU member-states. Because of this, Denmark's referendum resulted in a beat of the treaty, which shocked many countries, including Britain. Therefore, Major now found himself advocating the ratification of a treaty that every other member-state got wished to renegotiate. Thatcher condemned Major's support for the Maastricht Treaty and needed a British isles referendum on the treaty. With trouble at home, Major experienced anger and criticism from member-states who claimed that Britain persisted to remain centered on her self-interests and dismissed the problems facing the EU all together. Dread that France would vote against the Treaty gave way to a lack of self-confidence in the ERM, which resulted in the pound sterling being forced out of the ERM as a result of Britain being able to maintain the sterling above its place lower limit (Hansard, 1992). This latest development in the problems during the British presidency only served to fuel Britain's role as the EU's awkward partner.

As a result of resentment into the EU within Britain, Major struggled to keep up positive relationships with the European union; the nominations for the President of the Commission in June 1994 showcased Britain's have difficulty and awkwardness as a partner. At the meeting, Major vetoed the session of Jean-Luc Dehaene, announcing that he'd never consent to his nomination (Barber, 1994). European union member-states grew furious by Britain's stance, professing that Britain was driven by its home interests alternatively than its hobbies with the European union. Britain became the uncomfortable partner when the Council was required to acknowledge the nomination of Perfect Minister Jacques Santer of Luxemburg rather than their original nomination. Major's actions against Germany's nomination of Dehaene quickly deteriorated Britain's romance with German Chancellor Helmut Kohl.

What started out as a desire for complete EU co-operation concluded with Britain developing a tarnished reputation amidst its EU lovers. Major's actions against the European union, through his risks, vetoes, stances and general population speeches, resulted in his authorities being isolated from the politics of the EU. While a sizable portion of the issues with the European union emerged therefore of impact stemming from domestic insurance policy at home, Major's upset tone towards EU over the election of a fresh commission Chief executive, and over the mad cow problems of 1996 only served to help expand distance Britain from the EU.

Britain's Present Day Status

Though this report only discusses the governments of Heath, Wilson, Callaghan, Thatcher, and Major, it's important to note that despite the fact that relations have slightly improved between Britain and the European union, there still remains stress between the two partners to make Britain continue its avenue as an awkward partner. While the Blair and Brown administrations have improved upon Britain's relationship with the EU, there still is available an awkward romantic relationship between the two associates. Though political functions have change, Britain persists to keep up its position as the EU's uncomfortable partner consequently of the domestic fear in accepting the EU's role and impact in English politics; the strong sense of preserving national pleasure and through the rejection of Western european federalism; and lastly, as a result of the extended focus on retaining a strong marriage with the United States.

Nevertheless, while domestic uncertainty towards EU has remained prevalent in Britain, one can say that the EU has indeed experienced an impact on United kingdom politics and Britain's international policy. Once known because of its prominent decision-making role in international affairs and in its domestic guidelines, Britain has shifted its view of global politics compared to that where they have noticed that its marriage with the United States and the EU are equally very important to the success of the nation. Thus, while Britain still remains an uncomfortable spouse to the EU, the steps and actions that Britain has taken in the two latest administrations - and with any luck in the forthcoming administration - can be stated as an attempt by the British isles nation for taking slow and determined steps towards ultimately embracing its regular membership within the European Union.

More than 7 000 students trust us to do their work
90% of customers place more than 5 orders with us
Special price $5 /page
PLACE AN ORDER
Check the price
for your assignment
FREE